Ambulances Attack — Who Dun It?

Ambulances Attack — Who Dun It?

It’s a Blatant False Flag – the Question Is: Whose?

Why would anyone attack the four ambulances operated by the Jewish community health service operation in North London?

The obvious answer is not some utterly irrational outburst of ‘antisemitism’, but that it is a foolish reaction to the IDF flattening entire hospitals in Iran. Those with slightly longer memories may recall similar atrocities in Gaza, such as the March 2025 Israeli attack not just on ambulances in Rafah (centre and right photos) but also on the paramedics running them.

The 15 aid workers were killed and buried in a shallow grave by IDF troops, a blatant war crime only worsened by the twists and turns in the efforts of the Zionist authorities and media to ‘explain’ the atrocity. If such brutality has driven some Muslims mad with anger and hatred, it wouldn’t really be suprising.

But the ‘obvious’ answer is not always the best one. We must set the simple answer favoured by the Occam’s Razor theory against the question “Cui Bono?” Who benefits from the disgraceful North London arson, and from the other spate of vandalism attacks by the previously unknown group which has apparently claimed responsibility?

The answer is certainly not Iran. The Iranians have not even targeted ambulances or hospitals in Israel, let alone in London. If the Iranians want to hit London – or make a show of being willing to do so – they would do so with one of their missiles (assuming that Israel, the US and the Starmer regime are not lying to us about that nearly revealed capability). If they want to retaliate against British military action alongside the USA and Israel, they would go for UK military assets closer to home.

Random arson attacks against unguarded civilian targets do absolutely nothing to show a resolute, confident state, and they do nothing except help Western governments sell their monstrous and highly destructive war to their public.

The Persians invented chess, and – under sanctions which would have broken most countries – have designed drones which have changed the face of modern war and ballistic missiles which can reach Downing Street. The idea that they would engage in counter-productive vandalism and arson is absurd.

The only beneficiaries of such petty but shocking attacks are the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv and its warmongering allies, puppets and assets in Britain, Belgium and other countries where the ultra-shadowy Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (HAYI) claims to have struck.

To judge by its earlier antics, this is not much more than a Wolfie Smith outfit. Even those promoting the line that this is a strangely amateurish offshoot of the highly professional Iranian Revolutionary Guard have noted that its Arabic statements, and even its logo, are littered with basic spelling and grammar errors.

Now, while Iran is not an Arab country, it has extremely close relations with all sorts of Arabic speakers, not least Hezbollah, which in turn has large numbers of sympathisers among immigrant communities in every Western country. The idea that real pro-Iranian auxiliaries wouldn’t be able to get their Arabic corrected is ridiculous. To be fair, the same also goes for the Mossad.

It doesn’t really matter exactly who gets arrested, because they may either be innocent but fitted up, or guilty but manipulated by one of the several forces with a vested interest in spreading the idea that Iran is behind such nasty but essentially pantomine-villain ‘terrorism’.

It all points in one direction: This is a black propaganda op by people hostile to Iran, not run by Mossad but by people much less subtle and capable. Given that it is apparently operating in various Western European states, and that its efforts are being used to push Europeans (including the Brits) into war behind the USA and Israel, it is much more likely to be the incompetent work of either:

1) A Western intelligence agency, probably using agent provocateurs and idiot Muslim converts

2) Iranian exiles who support the thoroughly useless ‘Shah’, or

3) Freelance Zionist ultras, probably based in Belgium or France.

The third of these is certainly possible; you only have to think of the number of ‘antisemitic hate-crimes’ for which the ‘victims’ end up getting arrested to know that these petty false flags have a real appeal to some within that community.

The Zionists have an added vested interest in reviving the spectre of violent antisemitism, in that such attacks not only make Western states more likely to support Netanyahu’s war, but also push ordinary Jews to emigrate to Israel.

Option 1 is also by no means far-fetched. The American authorities have form for recruiting moronic Islamists (including Westernised immigrants and converts who speak no or poor Arabic) and autistic Nazis to carry out convenient false flag attacks or to demonise dissidents.

MI6 also have a long history of weaponising such brain-dead ‘radicals’. After all, the Manchester Arena bomber and his family were very much on their radar and encouraged to go and fight Gaddafi, making the later ‘blowback’ all too predictable.

The idiotic pro-Shah losersare also heavily influenced by the CIA, MI6 and Mossad. These exiled, reactionary Iranians are also the possible source of the weak Arabic.

Unless, that is, we’ve all drastically over-estimated the competence and confidence of the Zionist propaganda machine. I suppose that might be a thing, especially if their hoped-for Messiah is neither G-d nor Satan, but just a very naughty boy.

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/ambulances-attack-who-dun-it