Will the Epstein Transhumanists ‘Factory Reset’ the Rest of Us?
Jeffrey Epstein was not just a sexual blackmailer for the Mossad. That was merely his day job. Thanks to the release of some (but far from all) files, in limited compliance (i.e., non-compliance) with the Epstein Transparency Act, we now know that Epstein moonlighted in a wide spectrum of influence operations, many of which targeted scientists whose groundbreaking work Epstein’s accomplices wanted to spy on.
More than a few of those scientists worked on projects related to transhumanism , an intellectual movement that strives to replace the old-fashioned human with a kind of improved successor. Epstein reportedly wanted to “ develop a super-race of humans with his DNA .” He funded research into “regenerative medicine” along the lines of what today’s New York Times tells us is achieving breakthroughs in life extension. And he funded consciousness research aimed at imposing “altered states of consciousness” on the masses and erasing humanity’s traditional self-image. This latter project is the subject of an interesting new critique by Courtenay Turner titled “ The Factory Reset: Gino Yu, Jeffrey Epstein, and the fifty-year project to replace the human being — from SRI’s Changing Images of Man to the Oval Office ,” writes Kevin Barrett .
Turner places Epstein’s projects, and transhumanism in general, in the context of an age-old philosophical struggle between the followers of Heraclitus, who stated that “everything is in motion,” and her own camp, which sides with Parmenides, who stated that “being is stable.” She argues for an Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition that posits a fixed human nature with God-given inalienable rights that form the basis of natural law, as enshrined in the American Founding Documents in general, and the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in particular. She offers a “short version”:
“A human being has a fixed nature, a soul of his own, and an intrinsic telos. What he is is not open to discussion. What he is directed towards is unchangeable. The dignity of the person is therefore inviolable, and no project—scientific, political, or spiritual—has the right to make him into something else.”
For Turner, this viewpoint is typically American and “Judeo-Christian.” According to her framework, Epstein and transhumanism are outsiders at war with the traditional Western/American self-image. We must resist this by returning to our traditional Western/American roots. The Epstein group wants to destroy our traditional identity, so our response should be to focus on it even more strongly.
While I understand her position and share her aversion to Epstein and transhumanism, I do not think that her philosophical framework of Heraclitus versus Parmenides is the best way to understand the issues surrounding Epstein and transhumanism. The problem with the Epstein class is not that they are too eager to shed their egos and embrace Heraclitian change, but that they are supremacists with colossal egos that both they and the world would be better off without.
The “Judeo-Christian” tradition has long trampled on the world, violating the rights of all others while hypocritically proclaiming doctrines such as natural law and universal morality, the privileges of which it reserves for itself, particularly for the wealthy members of its upper classes. Ordinary people, people of color, and other “savages” need not sign up.
Ideologically, the source of this problem lies more in Judaism than in Christianity. Judaism reads the Old Testament as a tribal legend that justifies the supremacy of the chosen tribe over all others – including the right to commit genocide. By accepting the flawed Old Testament as infallible Scripture, Christianity has become tainted by that supremacism.
The Epstein class consists primarily of zombie Jews and zombie Jewish Christians who lost their religious faith but retained their supremacism. They think they are better than the rest of us “goys”—a pejorative term for non-Jews that pops up throughout the Epstein files. Therefore, they feel free to rape, traffic, and exploit lesser beings.
As for transhumanism: the ideological roots do not lie with Heraclitus, but with messianic-millennial Jews who want to become even more privileged and supremacist than they already are. They do not strive to destroy their colossal egos. On the contrary, they want to enlarge them even further, to the point where the Chosenites will rule the world from a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, and every ‘Jew’ (i.e., member of the Epstein class) will own 2,800 ‘goyim slaves’ (i.e., the girls Epstein trafficked, who were all non-Jewish).
People with enormous egos, such as the self-proclaimed ‘chosen ones’ and more than a few groundbreaking scientists, not to mention the current US president, are often astonishingly incapable of understanding the viewpoints of others, let alone recognizing them as equals and applying the Golden Rule. If transhumanist scientists are not particularly bothered by the possibility that their work will destroy the livelihoods and perhaps even the lives of ordinary people, it is not because those scientists have followed Heraclitus and the mystics and destroyed their egos through meditation or psychedelics or whatever, but more likely because they have not.
And if Epstein-type supremacists want to reprogram the minds of the masses to make them malleable, as evidenced by Epstein’s collaboration with Gino Yu , that is not because Heraclitus incited them to do so. The Epstein class is merely the latest example of what the Quran calls a mala’ , a wealthy, selfish, corrupt ruling elite consisting of people who think they are better than the rest of us. All thousands of prophets, not only from Moses to Jesus to Muhammad, but also in other cultures, have been sent by God to oppose the mala’ of their time and place, by speaking the truth to corrupt power and calling people to rise up against the tyranny of their corrupt and unjust mufsidun rulers.
It should therefore not surprise us that the Epstein class rules the Judeo-Christian world virtually unhindered, while the global uprising against the Epstein class is led by Islamic Iran. After all, we object to Epstein and the transhumanists, not because they embrace the wrong ancient Greek philosopher, but because they violate the same tried and tested basic morality taught by all prophets and wisdom teachers—and by most philosophers, with a few notable exceptions among the Straussian “teachers of evil” and their ilk. And the last and best-kept prophetic revelation, Islam, forms the basis for the Islamic Republic of Iran and its Axis of Resistance to wage its global war against the Epstein class.
So Turner is overthinking. Epstein’s crimes and transhumanism are simple moral issues.
Anyone with a functioning moral compass, whether Heracliteans like the philosophers of trial or Aristotelians like Turner – and whether they are “Judeo-Christians” (a contradiction in terms) or Muslims or Taoists or whatever – should be able to understand that trafficking and raping girls, and plotting the destruction of humanity, is wrong.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/zullen-de-epstein-transhumanisten-de-rest-van-ons-fabrieksresetten