How the Jews Defeated Thomas Massie — and Themselves
The Make Israel Great Again movement, Epstein Class, and Kosher Right are celebrating Ed Gallrein’s 55% to 45% victory over Thomas Massie in the Republican primary election for Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District. This was the most expensive House primary in US history. Only 70 of Gallrein’s donors came from Kentucky compared to 1,545 Kentucky donors for Massie. According to Grok, 80-85% of Gallrein’s financial support came from Jewish sources like AIPAC and the Republican Jewish Coalition Victory Fund. Massie was targeted for defeat because he opposed Jewish power. But closer examination shows this to be a Pyrrhic victory for the Jews.
First and most importantly, the Jews gloating over essentially buying a Congressional seat continues the pattern of their mask slipping as they lose public support. On X, AIPAC posted their signature line that “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics!” Which of course is an anti-Semitic canard or trope with no basis in reality when we notice it. And while US sources are claiming that Trump unleashed his wrath on Massie for disloyalty, Haaretz agreed yet again with White Nationalists in their article titled “The Most Consequential Republican primary for Israel is happening in Kentucky.”
At first, I was suspicious that voter turnout being roughly twice that of previous primaries was because of voter fraud. But on further reflection, this was the most expensive House primary in US history. Rather than suggesting fraud, the turnout and outcome prove that Oswald Spengler was right yet again about democracy:
Democracy has become a weapon of moneyed interests. It uses the media to create the illusion that there is consent from the governed. The press today is an army with carefully organized weapons, the journalists its officers, the readers its soldiers. The reader neither knows nor is supposed to know the purposes for which he is used and the role he is to play. The notion of democracy is often no different than living under a plutocracy or a government by wealthy elites.
And of course, it is Jews who control the money which is used to effectively buy votes through churning out crass advertising slop. I could hammer this point home further, but it would be overly redundant. Everyone who isn’t a Fox News watcher is beginning to see it. I count the Jews delegitimizing both themselves and democracy as a metapolitical win.
Second, this was a primary election. A lot of the Kosher Right is saying some variation that “X isn’t real life.” While correct, a primary election is not the general election either. A divisive primary like this one will likely alienate Massie voters, who in the general election may either vote Libertarian or stay home as a result. This election was not about which candidate is best, but rather over the existential issue of Zionist subversion. And divisive primaries tend to backfire in the general election, hence the arch-RINO Reagan’s commandment to never speak ill of other Republicans.
Furthermore, while Trump showed in 2016 that you can win by firing up the base rather than by appealing to Independent fence sitters, any candidate will need at least some Independents. Every single poll, including those which I have conducted for the Homeland Institute, show that unlike immigration and other issues, Zionism and support for the 2026 Iran War is highly concentrated within the GOP. The true fallout of the Iran War—rising food prices due to a fertilizer shortage—hasn’t even hit yet, and Independent voters are often highly concerned with the economy. Thus, Zionist GOP candidates like Vivek and Gallrein who alienated an essential chunk of their own party’s base in the primary will now also have to contend with Independents turning away from them in the general election.
Third, it is not economically sustainable, even for the Jews, to spend a small fortune every time an anti-Zionist candidate runs for office. Especially since they would seek to crush them in the primary elections before they gain traction, which traditionally have been much cheaper than general elections. Now consider how spending in the Republican primary for Ohio governor was even more extreme and lopsided. While Casey Putsch only won 18% of the vote in that election, his side also only spent $46,000 while Vivek Ramaswamy’s spent $25 million. That comes down to each vote costing about $.32 for Putsch and $37.10 for Vivek. Thus, Putch’s money went about 115 times as far as Vivek’s.
Vivek’s side spent that much not just to win the primary or to increase name recognition for the general election. They primarily did so for metapolitical rather than political reasons. They desperately want to gaslight Americans into thinking they are doomed to one side of the uniparty or the other. Thus, we should not allow the final result of any election to dissuade us just because the based candidate “lost.” We should instead look at how based candidates are doing better over time, along with how much they can force the uniparty to spend while running on a shoestring budget.
Imagine if we had Nationalist candidates standing in almost every election. Even Miriam Adelson would eventually go broke from playing that much electoral whack-a-mole.
Fourth, Massie’s primary shows that Zionism will pass with the boomers. Massie won every single other age cohort. The only problem is that boomers showed up in droves and outvoted everybody else even more than they usually do.
Massie voters are in red, Gallrein voters in blue.
MIGA is reveling in their victory. But it won’t last. They are like hoodlums trashing an apartment or AirBnB when evicted. They don’t care about the long-term damage they are causing to either America or the Republican Party. It’s not a question of if we will break Jewish control over America’s government, but only how much damage they will do before they are dethroned.
Fifth, the Kosher Right celebrating their victory over the “Woke Reich,” as Mark Levin likes to call us, is disingenuous because Massie was not one of us. He was a staunch Libertarian who firmly and sincerely believed in his principles. This led to him being strong on Zionism but weak on immigration. To be one of our guys, you need to be strong on both Zionism and immigration. And if Massie had been pro-Zionist and pro-immigration, he likely would have been embraced by Trump as Lindsey Graham was.
Massie’s Libertarian stance on immigration probably played into why he couldn’t muster more turnout among non-boomers. In 2016, Trump showed that you can win by being tough on immigration and rejecting foreign influence. And as I explained here, Americans can copy Péter Magyar’s campaign strategy which defeated Viktor Orbán by outflanking him on immigration from the Right, rejecting foreign influence, and promising to clean up corruption. While Massie was good on foreign influence and corruption, being soft on immigration was a fatal weakness.
If a candidate could combine Casey Putsch’s and Péter Magyar’s platform with Thomas Massie’s money, they would likely trounce their opponents, both Republican and Democrat. The uniparty likely knows this too, which is why they poured money into these two primaries at ruinous expense.
Donald Trump, being shallow and trusting of Jews, seems oblivious to all this. The Jews making Massie’s primary the most expensive in US history is a direct pathway to another historical record: the first time a President will not just be impeached, but convicted. Trump is going to be blindsided in the midterms, and a Democrat Congress will then hold him accountable for war crimes, lying about Iran posing an imminent threat, and insider trading.
When this happens, the Jews will abandon Trump like fair weather friends. They already got what they wanted. Ironically, this will be a win for us and a loss for the Jews. They will destroy the soft-on- immigration, Zionist warmongers of MIGA, thereby creating a political void we can rush in and fill. And most importantly, everyone not mesmerized by TV will see that “With Jews, you lose.”
https://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-defeated-thomas-massie-themselves