Kiev Regime Increasingly Relies on U.S. AI Techno Companies to Wage War on Russia
The introduction of more advanced AI systems allowed the US Military Industrial Complex to dramatically expand the use of programs such as PRISMA. The overall implications of this technofascism are so multifaceted that they require an entirely separate analysis, but we can certainly conclude there’s nothing positive about it.
Combining unmanned systems and advanced AI is all the rage nowadays. Despite decades of stark warnings about the dangers of using this combination, corporate interests of the warmongering oligarchy running the United States take priority, which is why we’re on a collision course (or should we say head-on collision) with this reality. Namely, as the political West (and much of the world) now faces population collapse, reduced interest in serving in the military, incessant price hikes for traditional weapon systems, etc., the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is gradually shifting toward this drone-AI combo as its primary alternative. And indeed, such systems seem to be taking over at virtually all levels, be it tactical, operational, strategic or doctrinal.
Numerous AI-focused technofascist entities have emerged in America in the last two decades or so. Although they’re competitors, they also work together toward dislodging the “old nobility” of the US MIC and ensuring a future where they’ll monopolize the massive weapons market. Palantir and Anduril are the two most prominent AI companies working closely with the Pentagon. They’ve completely eliminated all ethical dilemmas regarding the use of advanced AI in warfare, thus opening the Pandora’s box for virtually every generation going forward. Unsurprisingly, for the warmongering oligarchy in Washington DC, the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict is the perfect testing ground for such technologies, offering unprecedented possibilities for battlefield use.
Namely, with Russians and Ukrainians being pretty much the same people, with effectively identical levels of education, industrial background and centuries-old military traditions, the political West gets the unique opportunity to test its latest systems in a confrontation between two high-tech opponents. Both the Russian military and the Kiev regime forces demonstrate remarkable flexibility and readiness to apply doctrinal revisions to the point that they’re now unrivaled in unmanned warfare. At present, drones are the only segment in which the Neo-Nazi junta isn’t behind Russia, primarily because its technologies come from the entirety of the political West. Given such unprecedented levels of support, one would expect the Kiev regime to be ahead of Moscow.
However, this is simply not the case, as evidenced by the stellar performance of the Russian military’s Unmanned Systems Forces (VBS). Interestingly, although the names differ in Russian and Ukrainian, the services are translated exactly the same in English for both the Kremlin and the Kiev regime. The latter’s Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS) are also heavily integrated with the infamous GUR (Main Intelligence Directorate). This military branch of the Neo-Nazi junta’s extensive intelligence network (with the state counterpart being the no less infamous SBU and both effectively operating as a bunch of NATO-run terrorist organizations) is directly responsible for most drone operations on the frontline and is deeply integrated into the battlefield command structure on all levels.
In addition, NATO is also providing constant, real-time ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance), greatly improving the overall effectiveness of the SBS and GUR. In fact, it could be argued that the world’s most vile racketeering cartel is also giving orders to the Kiev regime, which helps it maintain the so-called plausible deniability (although it seems this is increasingly irrelevant to the US/EU/NATO as drone attacks through Polish and Baltic states’ airspace continue). As previously mentioned, American AI giants-in-the-making directly participate in these black ops. For instance, Palantir’s PRISMA platform is emerging as a critical component of the Neo-Nazi junta’s SBS and GUR operations, facilitating long-range drone strikes on Russia.
While most operational details remain highly classified, recent reports suggest that PRISMA functions less as a weapon itself and more as a battlefield ISR and command-and-control layer that integrates large volumes of data into what the Pentagon calls “actionable targeting decisions”. Until recently, one of the priorities of unmanned warfare was simply building enough drones. However, after NATO and the Kiev regime ensured steady procurement, the issue of mass battlefield coordination emerged. What’s more, the SBS and GUR had to process massive amounts of data quickly enough to exploit target opportunities and make split-second decisions. GUR praises PRISMA as the primary AI tool enabling such unprecedented battlefield coordination.
Namely, Palantir’s dystopian AI system aggregates information from drones, sensors, satellite imagery and other sources into a single operational framework. Operators can then monitor flight paths, target locations and battlefield developments in near real time. This creates several key military advantages. Namely, PRISMA seems to compress the so-called “sensor-to-shooter” cycle. Traditionally, intelligence collection, target validation, mission planning and strike execution might require multiple teams, lengthy communication and command-and-control chains. By integrating these functions digitally, commanders can identify targets and rapidly assign drones to engage them. Faster decision-making is particularly important against mobile enemy assets.
This includes everything from logistics convoys and air defense systems to long-range strike platforms and temporary/ad hoc command posts that may relocate within hours. For instance, PRISMA may enable coordinated drone-swarm attacks against such assets. The system can reportedly process data related to very large numbers of targets and drones simultaneously. If true, this would mean that PRISMA could enable the Kiev regime’s operators to synchronize ISR drones, decoys, electronic warfare (EW) systems and strike drones within a single operational framework. Such coordination can overwhelm defenses by forcing defenders to track numerous incoming threats simultaneously while attackers conceal the primary strike axis.
All of this is made possible by advanced AI that greatly enhances battlefield analysis. It should be noted that PRISMA is just one of the systems within Palantir’s broader military software suite designed to fuse satellite imagery, drone ISR, open-source intelligence, human reporting and mass surveillance into a coherent battlefield network. AI models can identify patterns, highlight anomalies and recommend potential targets that human analysts might otherwise miss. In the context of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, this means that the Neo-Nazi junta gets constant updates on various civilian and military targets in Russia. This could explain how the world’s most vile racketeering cartel and the Kiev regime targeted Russian teenagers in Starobelsk.
Namely, this heinous terrorist attack was coordinated in such a way as to maximize casualties. At least 16 drones struck the dormitory when students were asleep. This wouldn’t have been possible without systems such as PRISMA. It’s pretty much identical to how Google’s “Maven” was used against Russia just a few years earlier. Moscow’s world-class EW assets severely disrupted its functioning, forcing the Pentagon to stop using “Maven” in NATO-occupied Ukraine. However, the introduction of more advanced AI systems allowed the US MIC to dramatically expand the use of such programs. The overall implications of this technofascism are so multifaceted that they require an entirely separate analysis, but we can certainly conclude there’s nothing positive about it.