Fauci’s Willing Executioners
Anatomy of a premeditated atrocity.
When it comes to totalitarian regimes of the modern age, it became fashionable at some point to focus upon the given dictator’s “willing executioners,” that is to say, those petty functionaries who saw themselves as the foot soldiers of complicity-enforcement, and who even took pride in such a designation.
In calling such people “willing executioners,” there was surely, in many cases, a degree of judgmental oversimplification, and needless casting of aspersions. After all, authoritarian structures always pose a threat to those who wish to survive under their depredations. Ordinary people are inevitably faced with extraordinary circumstances, in which not merely their own livelihoods and lives are put at risk, but also those of their loved ones. Indeed, their friends, spouses, parents, and children may well end up suffering by proxy if they turn openly dissident.
Thus there often emerge those complicated calculations, in which one opts to “pick one’s battles,” to determine “the hill to die on,” which means forgoing literal “deaths” on other such metaphorical “hills.” One decides what can live with, for the sake of keeping one’s loved one’s safe, and where one simply must draw the lines, consequences to oneself and others be damned.
With circumstances like these in mind, one oughtn’t speak in too glibly condemnatory a manner about “willing executioners,” unless one has well-established that which is implied in such an emphatic phrase: namely, that the willfulness to kill was present in such people, even absent any compulsion from above. This makes for a dauntingly high threshold, one that few would meet, other than the truly homicidally hateful, already itching to “terminate” their fellow citizens with at least moderate to severe, if not extreme, prejudice.
********************************
On the other hand, perhaps the concept of “willing executioners” could be conceived in a different manner, one that, while certainly hyperbolic, nevertheless indicates a profound and unassailable truth, after the manner of all properly-marshalled hyperbole.
When understood in this manner, “willing executioners” can be referenced, not in so baldly literal a sense as actually willing that others be murdered, but rather as being in a position where they have behaved in a patently irresponsible manner that has led, directly or indirectly, to the severe injury and/or death of others.
It has been extraordinarily disturbing to witness the manner with which an experimental, largely ineffective, and potentially dangerous medical treatment, namely the so-called “vaccine,” has been foisted upon a generally ignorant and unsuspecting public. In contemplating this subject, one finds oneself confronted by a malicious fraud of epic proportions, whose proponents have willfully and recklessly caused great harm to an enormous number of people, and have endured little in the way of blowback, much less prosecution, for their crimes.
Of course, such malignant campaigns have been perpetrated in the past, by one pharma giant or another, aided by one billionaire oligarch “philanthropist” or another, in which the reckless dispensation of an experimental drug caused many people injury and/or death. The difference between those incidences and the current one is essentially that the prior atrocities (which have now most curiously been scrubbed from much of the internet) took place in a limited capacity in a backwater Third World setting, while the current and ongoing vaxtrocity is a worldwide event, in which hundreds of millions, rather than merely tens of thousands, have been exposed to possible, perhaps even likely, ill effects, introduced via some friendly neighborhood health worker wielding a needle and syringe.
**********************************************
In order to make people desire “the vaccine,” of course it was first necessary to seize control of commerce and restrict human interaction via “emergency powers.” Under these “emergency powers,” which were mostly created out of whole cloth and possess little to any resemblance of constitutional legality, a “lockdown” was ordered, ostensibly to “stop the spread” of a supposedly novel virus that had ostensibly emerged upon the world in 2020.
This virus, an upper-respiratory infection much like the standard-issue flu except less deadly, with a survivability rate of over 99%, was not in substance any different than previous declared “pandemics,” such as SARS in 2003 and the so-called “swine flu” in 2009, and neither of those previous “pandemics” had necessitated locking down much of the world or radically restricting a person’s ability to assemble with his fellow man, whether at places of work (which, aside from places deemed “essential,” were generally ordered to be shut down indefinitely), or at schools (which also shut down and immediately went “virtual”), or at locations dedicated to recreational activity (restaurants, bars, sports stadiums, movie theaters, amusement parks, and nearly any other place dedicated to “fun” pursuits were likewise forcibly shuttered); or at places of worship (worship having apparently been deemed “inessential”); nevertheless, the appearance of this virus in the year 2020, it was insisted, was reason enough to enforce the most radically restrictive measures imaginable, including but not limited to those detailed above.
Citizens of various countries across the world were suddenly instructed to “shelter in place,” a term that had only been used for emergency conditions involving dangerous weather, like tornadoes and hurricanes, and when typically invoked were meant to remain in effect merely for hours, or at most a day or so; now, however, “sheltering in place” meant staying indoors for an indefinite length of time: perhaps weeks, perhaps months, perhaps even years!
Much similar rhetorical skullduggery followed, of course. Prior to 2020, “quarantine” had always meant “the act of keeping the sick away from the well in order to contain infection.” But in 2020, “quarantine” was suddenly redefined to mean “the act of keeping everyone (including the well) away from everyone else.” An entirely arbitrary designation of remaining “six feet apart” from others also came to be dogma, and eventually cloth masks were mandated in numerous locations, along with many other onerous and pettily tyrannical injunctions.
Forcing the population to live under such conditions, stripping them of their ability to socialize with their friends (except virtually, over Zoom or Skype), depriving many of them of their livelihood, canceling nearly all of their prized leisure activities, instructing them to remain in their homes nearly all of the time, and telling them that such was simply “the new normal,” and that they would just have to get used to it, had far-reaching and debilitating psychological effects on numerous people. Depression, especially among youth, skyrocketed, as did suicide rates. Domestic violence, likewise, hit a radical uptick.
In spite of the panoply of social ills caused by lockdowns, governing bodies mostly refused to lift their draconian measures… until an effective vaccine could be formulated. Only “the vaccine” (we were told) could change conditions, and restore some semblance of the “old” normalcy. Thus a mentally taxed, psychologically exhausted population came to hunger and thirst most eagerly for “the vaccine” to arrive.
Must one be that loathed and reviled character known as a “conspiracy theorist,” to suspect that such was the plan all along? Or rather, is such a conclusion merely evident from connecting all of the given dots of data by drawing the shortest, most eminently sensible lines between them?
**************
In December 2020, after nine months of relentless media-driven, establishment-orchestrated Covid-19 fearmongering– with a brief respite over the summer when the virus op got temporarily redirected towards the promotion of race-hatred via the George Floyd riots, during which the same lot who had been solemnly lecturing us about staying at home and remaining six feet apart from others at all times suddenly commanded us to take to the streets and march in extremely close formation, essentially cheek by jowl, through cities in “mostly peaceful” demonstrations that just happened to usually end in flames and bloodshed — there finally seemed to be some sign of actual respite.
Twenty-twenty, the “year from Hell,” was reaching conclusion. Just before Christmastime the news emerged that clinical trials were over, and that a legit “vaccine” had been developed, which was ready to be rolled out to the public.
People rejoiced: such a Christmas present was indeed a consummation devoutly to be wished, particularly after enduring a trying previous nine months of lockdowns, mask mandates, forced closures of businesses, and generally enforced isolation, to the point of what amounted to mass house-arrest in many regions of the world.
But now, thanks to science! (a word to be pronounced with a dramatic flourish a la Thomas Dolby, accompanied by an awe-inducing, bowel-rattling thunderclap), we could get back to the old normal again, at least until the next “current thing” (i.e., another psy-op) cropped up, and led us to a heretofore unexplored region of prescribed hysteria, mandatory demoralization, and orchestrated mass trauma, thus bringing us ever closer to the ultimate goal of our self-appointed world rulers: that wondrous event known as the “Great Reset,” in which the general public would finally “own nothing, and be happy” under the watchful all-seeing eye of an (assuredly benevolent) global governance grid…
What was important now, however (so we were told in December 2020), was for everyone, everywhere to get jabbed as soon as possible. The vaccine, we were informed, was highly effective and incredibly safe. Never mind that the trial period leading to its production had been extraordinarily short, compared to the typical span of time it takes for an experimental drug compound to be tested before it is deemed effective and safe. Months, not years, was time enough to verify effectiveness and safety in the case of this vaccine, somehow, for some reason assuredly known to someone…
The same authorities— namely, the medical/pharmaceutical/governmental complex, accompanied by their media mouthpiece lapdogs—who had spent much of the previous year endlessly barking and growling that we all needed to stay away from workplaces, schools, public parks, or anywhere else that people normally gathered together, lest they hasten the spread and send the medical system into a state of upset and turmoil with increased numbers of infected occupying hospital beds and ventilators (all this despite numerous hospitals being so demonstrably empty that nurses, when not getting laid off, were spending their work hours choreographing Tiktok dances instead of caring for patients)… these same former hectoring cry-bullies had now abruptly changed tack, and suddenly spoke as with one soothing voice, much like a hypnotist:
“The vaccine is safe. The vaccine is effective. The vaccine is now available to everyone, and no one should refrain from taking it. No one has any excuse not to take it, in fact (save for small children, and soon they won’t have any excuse not to take it, either).
“Pregnant women can and should take it. People with chronic conditions and severe allergies and debilitating immune deficiencies can and should take it. There is absolutely no reason to be apprehensive about taking it, regardless of who you are…”
So went the mantra.
The same medical/pharmaceutical/governmental coalition, and the same gratingly sycophantic press, who nearly to a man and woman had determinedly preached gloom, doom, and death for most of 2020, and who had collectively mocked and derided virus-related remedies that big pharma types could not profit from (like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine), now spoke with fervor of the unmitigated wonderfulness of the vaccine, which, it was revealed, would be made available in four different forms, each one furnished by a different pharma-giant: Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.
******************************
At the start of the vaccine campaign, the tone maintained by the vax propagandists was mainly upbeat, though always with an underlying undertone of aggressive proselytization. The vaccine was a cause of joy, they exulted; in taking it, you were doing your part for humanity, and also helping yourself to stay well. Of course, unlike typical vaccines, it would not prevent you from contracting the virus, they admitted (when pushed), but it would make symptoms milder, surely leading to fewer hospitalizations and deaths.
Many Americans obediently got in line and duly received their needful injections, jocularly called “jabs” or “pokes.” Spirits were high, and the overall mood of the vax-consuming public was jubilant; many posted their “I Got Vaxxed” logos with pride on social media, and thereafter avidly lapped up the social credit which was bestowed upon them by such blatant signaling of virtue.
*****************************
Of course, there proved to be a few bumpy moments during the initial rollout.
One unfortunate event involved Tiffany Dover, a petite brunette nurse in Tennessee who fainted on television while attempting to give an interview immediately after receiving her first jab. Later she unconvincingly claimed that it was her fear of needles that caused her loss of consciousness, but it that was so, then 1) why did she only pass out after the needlework had happened, during a television interview, and 2) if she is afraid of needles, why on earth was she working as a nurse in a hospital?
Following this live, televised embarrassment, Tiffany Dover seemed to disappear from view, inviting speculation that she was in ill health or perhaps even dead. The hospital public relations representatives claimed that she was fine, but mysteriously refrained from summoning her back before television cameras again to demonstrate proof of her declared fine-ness and end those pesky rumors that perhaps she was not so fine after all.
Then there was the case of Atlanta baseball great Henry “Hank” Aaron, who magnanimously received his shots in early January, for the stated purpose of leading by example in convincing black Americans that the vax was safe. ”I don’t have any qualms about it at all,” Aaron said, at the time, of his jabbening. “It’s just a small thing that can help zillions of people in this country.”
Inconveniently enough for the message he hoped to impart to his community, Hank Aaron suddenly died a mere fortnight later.
In covering his death, of course, few if any of the establishment media drew attention to his recent reception of the vaccine. In addition, “fact checkers” were hurriedly dispersed to “debunk” the notion that Aaron’s death and his pre-death vaxxing were in any way related to one another. He was simply an old man, they assured us, and he simply perished of old age; only a crank would assert that the jab could have been what did him in!
***********************
In the early days of 2021, the Covid-19 vaccine was sold in a generally positive manner, through metaphorical deployment of the carrot, rather than the stick. It was apparently believed—at least for a time– that the best way to get the vax-hesitant on board was to provide desirable incentives.
Thus corporations and governmental bodies initially went out of their way to make getting the shots “worth the while” of the populace. Public school teachers in my state were offered a generous financial stipend in exchange for permitting the vax-juice to be inserted into their bodies. A prominent donut chain offered one free donut every day for a year to customers who could provide an authentic vaccination card; in addition, free cheesecake, free hot dogs, free “gooey deserts,” (so much for alleged concerns about“health”!), free marijuana, and complimentary office equipment was alternatively offered by various companies. One gathers that the significant shortfalls experienced by such giveaway campaigns must have been defrayed by some official body or other; otherwise, it would likely be a backbreaker for such companies, many of whom were still suffering from having been forcibly closed down for nearly the span of a year, to just eat such major losses.
Other “vax-centives” included, but were not limited to, free lap dances from Las Vegas exotic dancers, free beer, free French fries, hundreds of millions of dollars in lottery money, and complimentary college scholarships. It was a crude farce, but there can be little doubt that it succeeded in convincing many to get pricked and injected with an assuredly “safe and effective” substance, with the ostensible goal of enabling society to “return to normal.”
Obscenely ridiculous as this crusade was, it at least had the virtue of avoiding tyrannical impositions. But making the vaccine compulsory in some mode or manner was, in fact, just around the corner. Soon, indeed, the proverbial carrot would be jettisoned for favor of the metaphorical stick.
In mere months, in fact, both governments and corporations began playing “hardball” on the vax. Employers of numerous companies and government branches were told to go vax themselves by a particular date or else face fines or dismissals. Exemptions were rarely, if ever, granted. Threats became ubiquitous, whether financial or otherwise. Divorced parents who went unvaxxed were told they couldn’t visit their kids. One Western nation went so far as to tell the vaxless that they couldn’t leave their homes. In slightly less draconian climes, the non-vaxxed were simply barred from entering stores, restaurants, or movie theaters. In some places, they could not, under penalty of law, board airplanes, trains, or busses.
None of these prohibitions ever made any sense, at least not as “protective” measures for the populace, because even the vax-manufacturers themselves admitted that this particular “vaccine” (if it even made sense to call it that) did NOT prevent a person from contracting the virus, nor did it prevent a person from passing the virus to others; it simply (when operating as it should) made one’s symptoms less severe. (How effective it was at even succeeding in this manner is very much open to debate, but that is a different issue.) The sole reason for these mandates was merely punitive; the clear motive was to punish those stubborn “purebloods” for their absence of compliance, and to apply greater pressure upon them to acquiesce.
Indeed, the intractably pureblooded, that is, those who refused to acquiesce, were relentlessly scapegoated. US President Joe Biden angrily declared that “a pandemic of the unvaccinated” was afoot, suggesting that the virus would have ceased to spread if only everyone had gotten vaxxed (clearly not the case, considering the huge numbers of double- and triple-vaxxed who nevertheless were continuing to fall ill). French president Emmanuel Marcon stated that he wished to “piss off” the unvaxxed, indicating that he took positively sadistic delight in imposing draconian mandates which violated citizens’ inherent right to bodily integrity.
Attacking the unvaxxed became an easy way to score virtue-signaling points, and not a few celebrities got in on the act. Aging rock star Gene Simmons and supposedly astute and principled political philosopher Noam Chomsky went even further than most, declaring that the unvaxxed needed to be shunned from society, and possibly even starved. “If you are willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an enemy,” lectured the degenerate, lizard-tongued oaf Simmons. “How can we get food to them (the unvaxxed)?” asked Chomsky—that ostensibly venerable voice of conscience– before answering himself, “Well that’s actually their problem.”
At the start of 2021, the Big Pharma-sponsored powers-that-be pushed a largely untested, experimental injection upon the population of the world via the offering of bribes (“get jabbed and receive goodies!”), but by the latter part of the year they assumed an increasingly tyrannical posture (“get jabbed or face dire consequences!”). Eventually, this degree of enforced coercion would cease, but not before numerous people felt they had no choice; against their better judgment, they stood down and let themselves get pricked.
The bitter fruits of this widespread campaign of untenable coercion are only beginning to be tasted.
**************
A few months into 2022, most vax mandates were lifted, though some still remained in effect. Shortly thereafter, a new “current thing” suddenly sprung into Western consciousness when Russia invaded Ukraine. Instead of sporting “Stay at Home” admonitions or mask emblems or pro-vaccine slogans, “NPC” types began posting Ukrainian flags and heaping hate on Vladimir Putin.
The virus/vax op was mostly quietly abandoned at around this point, though the vaccine still continues to be pushed, as well as a seemingly endless series of “boosters,” which apparently need to be taken at regular intervals to keep one’s body Covid-resistant. Hundreds of millions across the world have been double-, triple-, or quadruple-vaxxed; that is to say, they have been hit with multiple injections of a substance whose effect on the human body is generally unknown.
Those who have managed to pass through this span of time without succumbing to the overwhelming pressure to get jabbed have had to display fortitude in the face of a fierce propaganda campaign which has shamelessly attempted to whip up terror, fear, shame, and guilt. The “low-vibrational” orientation of the vax-push, psychologically speaking, and the manner in which the “pushers” operated, did not sit well with many. As dissident broadcaster Neil Oliver memorably put it:
“It’s the aggression that triggered me, early on. It was how rapidly that which might reasonably have been advised became coercive instruction… backed up by slanderous, aggressive, vitriolic, shaming rhetoric. And I thought, ‘If the people who ought to have our best interests at heart in this, if they really are doing it for our good, they wouldn’t need to force it… I thought, ‘Why am I being shouted at already? I haven’t done anything wrong! I was just asking questions about vaccines, all my wife and I did at the beginning was say, “Let’s watch this, let’s wait and see.” But waiting and seeing was swiftly taken away as an option. It was like, ‘Fish or cut bait NOW! And if you don’t do the right thing, we’re coming for you!’ The rapidity of that, how quickly it was like that, was what triggered the lizard tail in my amygdala or something, and I thought, ‘I’m in danger here!.. I thought, ‘This (the vax campaign) is not authentic; there is something profoundly wrong here…
“It so quickly became a slanging match. We were suddenly on the playground, being bullied by ‘big boys and girls,’ and I thought, ‘This is so inappropriate! This is an emergency facing the entire world, and within minutes, the best tool at their disposal has been calling people names! If there is no credible, readily understood argument that can be made in a low, calm voice…. If it’s already at the point where they just say, ‘If you don’t do it, I’m gonna hit you, and if that doesn’t work, I’m gonna hit you harder!’…. They don’t have something they can readily sell… so they have to force it on people, because there’s something hinky about it…”
Oliver here articulates with unique fervor and verve what many of us endured during the peak of the vax-push, albeit some with a greater level of ferocity than others. I did not personally find it very difficult to remain a “pureblood,” due to a fortunate set of circumstances, but other people I know had no objections to rolling up a sleeve and accepting an unknown and potentially harmful substance into their bodies, whether out of a desire to keep their jobs or return society to “normal,” or out of a desire to be a ”good citizen,” or because they felt they would be prevented from participating in normal, everyday activities if they refused.
To be fair, everyone I know who has gotten vaxxed— with one notable exception— has so far suffered no discernible debilitating effects. Whether the jab has actually aided their health in any worthwhile manner is a whole different question, as “breakthrough” cases seem to be quite common. But of course, the bought-and-paid-off media establishment never seems to consider the frequent occurrences of such “breakthrough” cases as indicating any sort of failure, since they can always fall back on the “The case you suffered would probably have been much worse if you hadn’t been vaccinated!” notion, which, conveniently enough, is never verifiable.
More egregiously, the numerous cases in which the vax seems to have been a causal agent of chronic ill health are simply covered up, ignored, and dismissed. Thus those who got the shots, whether willingly, out of a desire to do what they took to be the “socially responsible” thing, and others out a sense of compulsion, feeling that they had little choice if they wished to hold onto their jobs, or live “normal” lives where they weren’t constantly getting shunned and treated like reprobates, are alike given short shrift from medical authorities when they report their debilitating symptoms to doctor’s offices and hospitals.
Since the vax-injured, officially speaking, don’t exist, or at best, barely exist, they are given little if any attention in the mainstream media. People are encouraged to dismiss them as kooks or fakers, if they must be thought of at all. In any case, the ostensible reliability of the vax—its assured safety and effectiveness– must be upheld at all costs. No monied media source will dare say otherwise, because the Pharmatocracy’s tentacles reach deep into the bowels of the power-structure.
When monied interests own both media sources and governmental bodies, truth has little hope of emerging. Thus those in real and desperate need of just recompense—the legions of vax-injured people who are suffering daily—are instead regarded as unworthy of attention. This much, in itself, is a moral atrocity of supreme magnitude. But what might be the long-term effects of mass-injecting much of the world with an experimental substance of dubious effectuality.
*******************
We know little, if anything, about the long-term effects of this Covid-19 “vaccine,” which hasn’t stopped the corporate-medical-pharmaceutical complex from practically forcing their dubious injections upon a largely captive population.
As we have seen, this campaign was accompanied with a Soviet-style assault of propaganda, in which the bought-and-sold mainstream press jettisoned whatever scraps of credibility they ever previously possessed, and became full-bore, pedal-to-medal enthusiasts for Big Pharma, just as for months prior they monolithically, with one ominous voice, flogged the “Stay home and wear a cloth over your face or you’re killing grandma!” fearmongering.
Surely many have remained generally oblivious to the news media’s blatant dishonesty, even through this most extraordinary course of events. Yet even the news merchants’ mendacity cannot entirely hide the truth from those who care to engage with it. The altogether irresponsible manner in which the vax—an improperly tested experimental chemical compound– was relentlessly pushed upon everyone, without any regard whatsoever for extenuating circumstances, simply beggars belief. The fact that pregnant women, the chronically ill, those in frail health, and eventually even young children, were pressured if not forced to get injected, demonstrates that the health authorities do NOT truly care about the health of the populace.
If they had truly cared about people’s well-being, rather than with pushing the vax agenda at all costs, they would have been far more circumspect, given the circumstances. They would have been far more generous in granting exemptions, and would have altogether laid off the manipulative “hard sell” approach, both in the sense of attempting to “guilt trip” the population (by trying to make them feel like moral reprobates if they were quite reasonably hesitant), and in the sense of not pushing punitive mandates aimed at isolating and shaming those who declined to be compliant.
The fact that they persisted in behaving the way that they did serves as an indictment in and of itself. But– the legions of vax-injured and apparent vax-killed cases aside—another phenomenon has recently come to light which seems– pardon the bitterly ironic pun—likely to be pregnant with significance.
According to accumulated statistics the number of children born in the first four months of 2022 has dropped at a staggering rate amongst numerous nations compared to previous years. You may scrutinize these numbers here.
One wonders if, given the dropping birth numbers, the recent increase in inexplicably abrupt deaths of adults (given the heading of “SADS”—Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, a condition that I and many others had never heard of prior to around six months ago)—as well as the many discomfiting events we have been hearing about lately, such as young and healthy athletes collapsing in the middle of athletic contests, not to mention all of the anecdotal evidence regarding women suffering irregular menstrual cycles following reception of the jab… one wonders, under such circumstances, if the frank words of a certain evil mastermind in the TV series “Utopia” (which was filmed in 2019, just prior to the virus op taking effect) were meant after all to operate as a “revelation of the method” for those who orchestrated this entire “pandemic” in the first place:
“Now we have exactly what we want, hundreds of millions of Americans lining up, offering us their arms and letting us give them our creation… (This is) a cure for our current situation… We intend to stop human reproduction for three generations. The busy, endless global assembly line of babies will grind to a halt. In the first five years, we’ll start to see major birthrate declines… We are saving ourselves from ourselves… People (today) live too long, die less often, fuck too much, shit out too many babies… I love this planet, so I decided to take care of the problem, overpopulation!”
The parallels between the plot of “Utopia,” in which an “omnivirus” is purposely unleashed upon the world by global elites, followed by the production of a “vaccine,” intended apparently to be an agent to induce sterilization, the better to depopulate the earth, and the reality of the events of the last two and a half years, are certainly striking, and well worth taking into account.