Unraveling the Mystery of Who Assassinated Charlie Kirk and Why
“Somebody decided Charlie Kirk was a danger to the status quo. The battle runs deep.” – Col. Douglas Macgregor
“Charlie Kirk was evolving to have serious concerns about Israel. His murder silences that evolution and makes him a valuable martyr to serve the very anti-Christian forces that executed him.” – Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai
I’ve spent a lot of time (I stopped counting after 250 hours) investigating the tragic Charlie Kirk assassination at Utah Valley University and have come to a few conclusions. These are my opinions based on researching information from my own sources to hundreds of sources ranging from the most prominent – Tucker Carlson with his 16 million followers on X and Candace Owens with her 7 million X followers – to citizen reporters who have fewer than 5,000 followers to former military, snipers, hunters, and ballistics and digital imaging experts. I mainly focused on X (Twitter) information sources but much more independent reporting on the murder is available on YouTube, Rumble, Bitchute, Instagram, Facebook, Tik Tok (although new owner Larry Ellison may have something to say about it) and other social media sites. A massive number of independent journalists have written excellent articles on this traumatic and historically significant assassination with The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal setting off an avalanche of investigative reporting focusing on a possible Zionist connection.
Many lesser known investigators have conducted thoughtful video and podcast analyses including Redacted, Ryan Matta, Chris Martenson, Sam Parker, Ian Carroll, Zeb Boykin, Diligent Denizen, Project Constitution, the IntelSCIF and Jason Goodman. If someone has figured out the complete explanation of what happened on September 10, I am not aware of it. This subject has so many angles and complexities I won’t elaborate on here – for instance, a nexus between Mormonism, Zionism and Masonry – it’s enough to fill a book – but I will attempt to address a few key points.
My conclusions thus far: The official FBI narrative is preposterous and has been thoroughly debunked by many independent investigative reporters. A few of many specifics: snipers, veterans, gun enthusiasts and hunters agree the magic 30-06 bullet would have blown the back of Charlie’s head off. Despite the claims of Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec and other influencers that we all saw a leftist shoot Charlie (we didn’t), no video of Tyler Robinson shooting the rifle has been released. Why is that? And why was the crime scene destroyed?) Robinson may indeed be the man seen running across the roof, but despite the 2024 installation of 1,000+ state of the art cameras on UVU grounds, the video released to the public was too far away to actually identify who was running.
After the assassination, attendees were allowed to roam around the campus grounds for at least 20 minutes before police ordered them to leave. Decoys (George Zinn and possibly Phil Lyman, although the wonderful podcaster Kate Dalley who lives in Utah knows Lyman and says he’s a good guy) and distractions (spotters planted in the crowd) were used and the crime scene was destroyed – literally paved over.
I believe the assassination was a complex military operation involving Israeli and US intelligence using advanced technology. Security was irresponsibly lax: Six policemen, no metal detectors and no surveillance officers to catch rooftop snipers. Attendees, while required to register by submitting personal information which can be used for data collection purposes, weren’t even asked for their tickets. An Army HADES jet lowered its altitude and dropped off ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) drones that disrupted authorized recordings and broadcasts. However, at least 35 videos were still captured and stored in an online archive. This includes Adam Bartholomew’s more than an hour long video of Kirk’s campus debate he managed to record by hard wiring his camera equipment, thereby bypassing this Bluetooth exploit event.
The scenario that seems the most plausible to me is there were two events. Video and photo analysis and audio forensics indicate perhaps a subsonic projectile shot and what has been dubbed the “exploding microphone” theory promoted by Jon Bray in his highly technical analytical videos and explanations on X. I dismissed this hypothesis weeks ago but revisited it when additional facts were uncovered. Charlie’s black microphone clasp seen on his white t-shirt was connected to a RODE battery beneath his shirt that contained a shaped charge – a plastic explosive, metal cone and pellet. The device was remotely detonated by someone in the audience, possibly the security guard wearing the beige plaid shirt standing directly in front of Charlie when he touched his arm at the exact moment Kirk was hit. The magnetic clasp/mic was propelled into his neck and then fell out of his neck making the entry point also the exit wound. A video can be seen of this object entering and exiting his neck, although it is possible the video was altered. Many dismiss this theory because no burn marks were left on his shirt, however, the residue could have been crystals which would eliminate any scorching. This scenario would involve high-tech, perhaps even classified technology. According to UFO and assassinations expert Daniel Liszt, known as Dark Journalist, advanced technology is always used in assassinations. This theory is the only one that explains the extreme billowing of Charlie’s shirt in front and back. Additionally, it was discovered that a company in Tennessee, Accurate Energetic Systems, received a contract from May-August 2025 to manufacture “miniaturized demolition charges anti-personnel to support special purpose missions.” AES delivered the product and then the factory was totally demolished in September prior to the murder. A shot may have occurred simultaneously from a low velocity gun or rifle as a decoy to cover for the high tech explosion but perhaps also for redundancy purposes.
After Charlie’s security detail (Rockhouse Integrity Group or Integrity Security Solutions?) engaged in what looked like military signaling, the team rushed immediately in lock-step motion to Kirk after the shot/explosion, as if they had rehearsed their roles. They didn’t bother to take their sunglasses off to see better, didn’t appear to be engaging in any lifesaving measure, had no blood on their hands, and looked like they were handing off items to each other. The sinister thought that these guys were actually finishing Charlie off has crossed the mind of more than a few who have closely studied the videos. And Kirk’s right arm could be seen with his fingers moving, indicating he didn’t die instantaneously as was previously claimed.
It is irresponsible for anyone to state Tyler Robinson is the assassin because even though the governor of Utah claimed, “We got him!” 33 hours after the shooting, and Kash Patel assured us the FBI has the guilty man, under our Constitution Robinson is innocent until proven guilty. He hasn’t had a fair trial yet nor convicted of any crime. It is also irresponsible to state someone in his security detail or in the audience or a particular cameraman killed Kirk or that “Israel did it.” This is all conjecture. There may be a lot of circumstantial evidence to give someone a sneaking suspicion of what happened, but this remains an opinion and not actual proof.
In spite of the time I’ve spent looking into the murder, there is still much I don’t know. The judge in the case has issued a gag order on all 3,000 in attendance at the Utah Valley University TPUSA event, friends and colleagues. This is no doubt a desperate attempt to silence the conspiracy theories that have emerged from truth seekers motivated to do their own research because they do not trust the FBI. However, attempts to censor and shame voices questioning the official narrative (“You’re disrespecting the family!”) are hallmarks of a psychological operation.
Kirk’s murder is sadly the most significant political assassination of a globally known peace activist and opponent of US wars since John Lennon, and before him MLK, Malcolm X, RFK and JFK. Watching the powerful new documentary “RFK: Legacy” where Oliver Stone questions RFK Jr. as directed by executive producer Oliver’s son Sean Stone, was a vivid reminder of how RFK’s and JFK’s opposition to the Vietnam War and advocacy for peace placed a bull’s eye on both of them.
Charlie became a follower of Christ as a child. As a teenager, Kirk began attending rallies of the Tea Party, the grassroots political movement that drew intellectual and ideological inspiration from the 2008 presidential campaign of Ron Paul. One tenet of Paul’s platform was a non-interventionist US foreign policy, a position to which Kirk in the last two years of his life Kirk was making a complete shift. His transformation was based in part to his listening to the views of his millions of TPUSA followers. He was aware of the despair his Generation Z supporters felt about their future prospects to get job or buy a house or get married and have a family and he had empathy about their dim future prospects. These 30 year-olds and younger did not support the US funding the weapons and bombs Israel uses to bomb Gaza and other countries nor did they want any wars.
Charlie was also learning due to his own research, spiritual changes within himself, and influence from his colleagues and friends Carlson, Owens, Megyn Kelly and Dave Smith. Kirk had an open mind and heart to change his views and to courageously speak truth to power and take corresponding action. Kirk was undergoing a spiritual conversion from Christian Zionist evangelism toward Catholicism, praying the rosary and attending mass. His timeline on X the last month of his life reveals pro-Catholic posts including his interview with a priest on the topic of demons. Matt Bracken reports Charlie was wearing a St. Michael’s pendant as a Catholic bishop prayed over Kirk’s body.
Charlie had already proven his effectiveness and success in challenging and attaining political power. He was the leader of the most powerful youth movement of our time in America with chapters around the world. At the memorial service whose grand production resembled a Trump rally or TPUSA event, RFK Jr. acknowledged it was Charlie who convinced him to endorse Trump for president which counted for about 2 ½ million votes for Trump. The DNC wasn’t too happy about that. RFK credited Kirk more than anyone else with leading the effort to restore free speech in America. RFK Jr. said he and Kirk had received many death threats but both believed seeing their children live in slavery and losing their Constitutional rights was worse than dying. RFK Jr. said Kirk succeeded JFK, RFK and MLK as one of the greatest political minds and activists in history. As noted by Ben Shapiro, who announced he was ready to pick up Charlie’s blood-stained microphone, under Charlie’s leadership TPUSA had become more powerful than the RNC in terms of fundraising, organization and strategy. That didn’t make the RNC very happy.
Before Kirk’s murder, I hadn’t paid much attention to him which I regret. I say that because I realize now his views were evolving over the past two years and that he was sincere and while he knew his speaking truth to power put his life in jeopardy, he took the risk and continued to speak out knowing his life would likely be taken. I was aware his radio show followed Bannon’s War Room on Real America’s Voice but never listened to it and I knew his TPUSA conducted conferences featuring high profile voices on the populist right such as Carlson and Bannon. I had been turned off by Kirk’s support of all the wars and was particularly disgusted by the way he treated a student who asked him a question about Israel’s 1967 unprovoked and deliberate attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 and wounded 174 American servicemen, an intended false flag the US government covered up. Using a tone of voice far from his typical conciliatory inflection, he angrily accused the student of spreading a conspiracy theory which would not be tolerated.
After Kirk was killed, I listened to many of his interviews, radio shows, and campus Q&A debates with students, and was impressed by his preaching the gospel, his willingness to debate college students, and his ability to give common sense advice to these young people. I was very surprised to learn Kirk had changed from an unquestioning devotee of Israel who visited the Holy Land many times to a critic who questioned if Israel stood down on October 7 on Patrick Bet David’s October 13, 2023 podcast. This may have been the first time Charlie publicly indicated he was veering away from his unquestioning support of Israel. He told PBT as a 30 year old millennial he was tired of no win Middle East wars started by “bloodthirsty neocons.” Kirk later insisted on the release of the Epstein files despite Trump’s dropping the issue after it had been a campaign promise; criticized bullying and bribing Jewish donors; opposed legislation to outlaw anti-Semitic speech; and named secular Jews as the force behind open US borders, Marxism and the anti-white agenda. Kirk went to the White House to convince President Trump to keep the US out of Israel’s long desired war with Iran but the Commander-in-Chief reportedly rebuffed him. Charlie opposed the war in Ukraine and started to question the IDF’s atrocities against Palestinians in Gaza. Two days before he was killed, he texted “Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.”
Many believe the assassination of Kirk was a professional hit by the Mossad (or to be nit-picky about it possibly a rogue group representing Zionist interests). Since even Steve Bannon now publicly acknowledges what he has undoubtedly known for many years, that Mossad controls the CIA, then by extension the Agency was also involved in planning and carrying out the public execution. The circumstantial evidence behind this theory is monumental and has been widely reported by many independent investigative journalists. Michael Yon, former Green Beret, war correspondent, military strategist and voracious reader, reasons Zionists had the motivation, means and resources to carry out the deadly deed. Charlie wouldn’t take the silver (reportedly $150 million from Netanyahu as well as a visit to Israel) so they gave him the lead. However, if a tranny lone gunman happened by coincidence to take out and silence the spiritual, political, and cultural leader of 30 year-old and younger Americans, how convenient for Bibi Netanyahu who was losing the support of Kirk and millions of his followers.
At the Turning the Tide: 9-11 Justice in 2025 conference in Washington, DC on the day after Kirk was killed, I approached a podcaster I recognized. We chatted and she told me she was a friend of Charlie’s. I shared my theory of what led to his assassination: he had wandered off the Zionist plantation and was therefore considered a liability rather than an asset to their interests. The podcaster responded with agreement, adding all of Charlie’s friends she knew reached the same conclusion. America Journal host Harrison Smith posted on X Charlie was afraid Israel would kill him if he continued to speak out against their interests. As discovered by YouTuber Baron Coleman using Google Trends and James Li using a Google tool, IP addresses in Israel and Washington, DC were searching for many places (like the hospital and university) and people (like the medical examiner and judges) related to the assassination and its aftermath months before the murder, indicating foreknowledge. And it is odd Charlie’s tent was placed on UVU courtyard landscaping that from an aerial view resembles a Hanukkah menorah.
As for widowed wife Erika, I am aware of the criticism and even cruel comments about her and her parents. All or some of it may be true, but I am not comfortable exploring any of this at this time. I will say I picked up on the fact that when she dramatically raised her head heavenward during her speech at the pyrotechnic laden memorial production proclaiming, “That young man….I forgive him!” she was telling the world she accepted the official narrative that Tyler Robinson was her husband’s murderer. In the days following the assassination I found it off putting to receive texts and emails with Erika’s name attached soliciting for money. Also, I found the video ostensibly of Charlie in his casket with Erika’s prominently ringed fingers touching his rubber looking hands and her burying her head into his chest, bizarre. If you expect anyone to believe this, you might as well show his face. And I was puzzled how she could smile backstage with Trump at the memorial extravaganza and seamlessly accept the role as TPUSA CEO and co-host of Charlie’s radio show. I realize people grieve in different ways, but if my husband had been brutally murdered in the presence of me, my children, on camera and in front of the entire world, I would be a basket case for at least six months and would spend my time nurturing our children.
As for the many theories about how and who killed Charlie, I will dismiss the most amusing one contending a hologram was used. A hologram can look realistic if you are facing the stage, but the shocking sight of blood gushing out of Charlie’s neck was observed by eyewitnesses and captured on video from both sides of the tent. And CGI works on video but not in person. Admittedly, the outpouring of blood looked very much like the way blood reacts when a squib is used, and the small pool of blood on the corner of the table on which Charlie’s chair was placed to elevate him, and the absence of blood from the tent to the SUV lend itself to the use of a squib. Nevertheless, I reject the nonsensical theory that Charlie used a squib, he isn’t dead, he escaped via a trap door, and he’s living in Valhalla under a witness protection program. That one gave me a much needed laugh while immersing myself into this dire topic. Another theory that induced a chuckle was from a YouTuber whose 15-part series plot speculated how Charlie planned to fake his death to take the heat off Trump’s refusal to release the Epstein files but Mossad double-crossed him and deployed their own team who really did do him in.
TPUSA’s finances have been called into question and possible fraud has been suspected. Charlie sent a memo informing his executive team he was going to conduct a DOGE-like audit of the non-profit’s financials. Investment advisor Charles Ortel, an admirer of Kirk’s who has exposed the Clinton Foundation’s corruption, uncovered suspicious endowments to TPUSA and disturbing details of affiliated companies with multiple offices in locations such as shopping malls. Ortel said he could not find documentation reconciling how entities share expenses and revenues and that board members handling finances do not appear to be very financially astute. TPUSA has not questioned any aspect of the FBI investigation and is awaiting developments from the trial set to start on October 30. Meanwhile, it’s business as usual as TPUSA executives continue to host episodes of The Charlie Kirk Show and conduct campus visits.
There are many unanswered questions. A few: Why was there no ambulance at UVU? Was there an autopsy? There is a claim one was leaked but no report has officially been released. Why was Charlie taken to a hospital farther away than the one that was closer? Why is there no footage from the hospital? How was his body in the coffin less than 40 hours after he was killed? Was he cremated? Where is his body buried?
The good news is that the shocking and traumatizing murder of Kirk, the recognition of his living his Christian faith and all he accomplished are bringing many around the world to Jesus. Charlie was bringing souls to Christ and trying to save Western Civilization and “the lost boys of the West” as one speaker at the memorial service phrased it. Charlie Kirk deserves nothing less than the revealing of the whole truth and nothing but the truth as to who, how and why his life was taken from him.