This Supreme Court Ruling is What We Need to Help Save America From a Marxist Takeover
The 14th Amendment was written back in 1868 to protect the newly freed slaves. It was not meant to be a free-for-all, handing out citizenship like party favors to anyone who happens to trip over the US border. But that’s what happened. Over the decades, activist judges and opportunistic politicians twisted the 14th Amendment into something completely unrecognizable.
Over time, the left latched onto one key phrase and twisted it into a pretzel to suit their needs: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” That phrase wasn’t about geography. It was about loyalty. It meant people who were fully under American law and allegiance… citizens, legal residents, and those who had permanently cut ties with foreign governments. It was never intended for the children of illegal aliens, tourists, or temporary workers.
But that complete and total distortion created a massive loophole that has been driving illegal immigration, overwhelming border states, and costing taxpayers billions every year.
It’s honestly insane when you stop and think about what’s really going on. America is one of the only countries on planet earth that automatically grants citizenship to the children of illegal migrants. The result is millions of “anchor babies” draining our social programs and creating a massive incentive for even more illegals to cross the border.
The “anchor baby” saga has been a thorn in America First’s side. But now, finally, that could change.
Nearly every Republican attorney general in the United States is standing behind President Trump’s push to restore the 14th Amendment to what it is supposed to be: protection for American citizens, not a reward for pregnant illegals.
🚨UPDATE🚨
Nearly all Republican attorneys general are urging the Supreme Court to back President Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship.
In an amicus brief, they argued the 14th Amendment wasn’t meant for children of illegal or temporary residents, and that the policy fuels illegal immigration harming their states.
States are lining up, one by one, to stand with President Trump and the American people. Montana is #23.
Montana and 23 other states filed an amicus brief last week petitioning the Supreme Court to define that the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause does not confer automatic citizenship on every person born in America.
These attorneys general submitted a brief in support of the Trump administration, requesting the Supreme Court clarify his executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship.
The Trump administration is currently facing several legal cases concerning the executive order, including Trump v. Washington and Trump v. Barbara.
In both these cases, lower courts blocked the executive order from taking effect.
The plaintiffs in the legal cases challenging Trump’s executive order argue that anyone born on American soil is automatically a U.S. citizen, according to the brief.
The attorneys general said this argument is wrong based on text, history and precedent.
And that’s where this next X post brings the entire picture into focus. What happens if the Supreme Court sides with Trump and the Constitution is returned to its original foundation?
Well, we could actually save the United States from this Marxist assault we’re fighting right now.
And this post nails it, because it’s not just immigration where the 14th Amendment has been twisted beyond recognition. Out in California, lawmakers redrew district lines based entirely on race.
That’s called racial gerrymandering.
This battle isn’t new; it’s been simmering for over a century. The entire mess traces back to United States v. Wong Kim Ark, an 1898 Supreme Court case that twisted the 14th Amendment into something it was never meant to be.
That ruling opened the floodgates for today’s “anchor baby” loophole… a loophole that Dems have exploited for decades to reshape America’s demographics and voting base. Revolver broke it down years ago, and it’s worth looking at again, because this is the foundation of the entire birthright citizenship scam.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
Wong Kim Ark is the precedent that makes the great replacement scheme work. This ruling from 1898 is the root of absolute birthright citizenship in the United States. Thanks to Wong Kim Ark, if a pregnant illegal alien walks five feet over the border and then gives birth, that child is a U.S. citizen for life. If a Chinese tourist flies to Saipan and has a baby there, again, U.S. citizen for life.
The justification for this is the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
A detailed look at the 14th Amendment’s legislative history and the debates over similar laws at the time, though, makes it obvious that the authors of the law never intended it to cover the children of foreign nationals illegally in the United States.
The [1866] Civil Rights Act provided the first definition of citizenship after the ratification of the 13th Amendment, specifying “[t]hat all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.” Thus an overwhelming majority of Congress on the eve of the debate over the meaning of the citizenship clause of section 1 of the 14th Amendment were committed to the view that foreigners — and presumably aliens — were not subject to birthright citizenship. Most of those who voted in favor of the act were still serving in Congress when the 14th Amendment was under consideration. In fact, Senator Lyman Trumbull, the author of the Civil Rights Act and chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, was an ardent supporter of Howard’s version of the citizenship clause. “The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ . . . What do we mean by ‘subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else.” Not owing allegiance to anybody else, subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States, and not subject to a foreign power.[5] During debate over the Civil Rights Act, Senator Trumbull remarked that purpose of its citizenship clause was “[t]o make citizens of everybody born in the United States who owe allegiance to the United States.”
Today, the unspoken purpose of illegal immigration is to transform the country, inexorably, by allowing millions of illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. and have children who are instantly United States citizens. A future Republican administration should directly challenge this travesty of the law, and the Supreme Court should correct it.
Ending this nonsense is what an America First comeback looks like. It’s not just about border walls or deportations; it’s also about reclaiming the meaning of what citizenship means in the United States. For eons now, America has been treated like an open-house party where nobody checks the guest list and everyone eats for free.
READ MORE: Got skin problems? Ivermectin to the rescue…
If the Supreme Court sides with Trump, it could end one of the most destructive loopholes in US history and finally pull the plug on the left’s favorite form of demographic manipulation. No more automatic citizenship. No more vote-padding and racial gerrymandering. No more pretending that breaking our laws makes you some kind of stakeholder in our future.
This could reshape everything… and it’s about damn time.