They Call This Progress — Don’t Make Me Laugh
Much of what’s happening is described as progress, but of course it isn’t—it’s simply change. And much of that change is designed to keep us all so preoccupied that we don’t notice what’s happening in the world, and so preoccupied with our own daily problems that we don’t take action against the conspirators, the collaborators, and the constant attacks on our freedom and humanity.
Even small things are becoming incredibly time-consuming and exhausting. The bizarre and indefensible “recycling programs” implemented worldwide (everything happens in groups these days) are designed to make us worry about nonexistent climate change, to make us docile, to force us to accept that we have to do as we’re told, even in our own homes, and to keep us busy. Most of the carefully washed and sorted recycling is dumped or burned, and the environmental costs of collecting recycling far exceed the value it provides. In the UK, for example, a large portion of recycling has been shipped to distant lands to be dumped or burned. There’s no point even recycling paper (the most traditional recycling material). It’s better for the environment to grow trees and burn the discarded paper to generate electricity or heat, writes Dr. Coleman .
When you order something online, you’re bombarded with emails. You get a message that the purchase has been made, a message that your order is being processed, a message that the item has been transferred to the delivery company, a message that the delivery company has received the package, a message that the delivery company is preparing to deliver the item, a message that your purchase is in transit, and a message that the package has been delivered. Then you get an email from the seller letting you know that the delivery company has done its job and delivered the item, or something that was meant for someone else. I recently ordered a beautiful first edition of Herman Wouk’s novel “Youngblood Hawke” and instead received a pair of bright orange platform shoes in size 36. Where else can you find such pure excitement while shopping? And the excitement is doubled by the knowledge that someone who ordered a pair of bright orange platform shoes in size 37 undoubtedly received a beautiful first edition of “Youngblood Hawke.” Later, they’ll send you another email asking you to rate their service, and another from the delivery company asking how well you think they’ve performed. If you don’t respond immediately, these emails will be repeated at regular intervals. This deluge of unnecessary emails keeps us occupied with pointless trivialities. (It’s not uncommon for me to receive two copies of every email in this annoying chain.) Everything is intentional, designed to make life more frustrating, irritating, and tiring. That’s the plan.
The idea of giving citizens a universal basic income, now so popular with governments, conspirators, and neoliberals around the world, is not new. During his first year as president of the United States, Richard Nixon announced his “New Federalism” program, which would have provided all Americans with a guaranteed annual income. The proposal would have vastly increased the government’s power. Left-wing politicians hailed the idea as an example of “creeping socialism.” Nixon also proposed a decentralization program ostensibly intended to distribute power to local politicians by doling out subsidies and payouts. Nixon announced that he had become a Keynesian. What he failed to mention was that John Maynard Keynes, the economist, was a socialist who wanted to promote the “euthanasia of capitalism.” Like almost all the economists who followed him, Keynes was a neoliberal—an intellectually, emotionally, and morally backward individual without whom the conspirators could never have advanced their Great Reset. The main beneficiaries of the neoliberals’ efforts are, of course, those who “work” in society’s financial, insurance, and real estate sectors, because these are now the sectors where wealth is amassed – far removed from traditionally useful commercial and productive activities. The main losers are those involved in making and selling the products people need to live, and the clear winners are those in the financial services industry who pay themselves enormous bonuses even as their banks lose money. The global economy is not based on handling money, but on making things or providing services that improve people’s lives.
The word “progress” is used synonymously with “better,” but how do you define “better”? Is receiving an email from a friend on holiday better than receiving a postcard? Is the world a better place if all cars looked exactly the same? Is it better if fireplaces are banned by health and safety officials? Are trains better now that there are no more dining cars and sleeper cars? Or has life been ruined by fanatics, cultists, and ignorant busybodies, unknowingly acting on behalf of conspirators seeking a Great Reset? Is life better now that there are no more junk shops, rag-and-bone men, and handymen who could fix everything you couldn’t fix yourself? Is life better now that general practitioners have the same hours as librarians and you have to plan your emergencies a day or two in advance if you want an ambulance to the hospital? Are hospitals better now that nurses spend more time in meetings than on the ward, always too busy and too important to find a bedpan, fluff pillows, help a frail patient eat, or put a bouquet of flowers in a vase? Is it progress that children now learn using iPads instead of pen and paper, chalk, and a blackboard? Is a smartphone really progress compared to a piece of slate and a slate pencil? Half a century ago, children played hopscotch, skipping rope, and in the winter they played football with jackets as goalposts, while in the summer they played cricket with stumps of chalk on lampposts. During their summer holidays, they splashed in paddling pools or sailed toy yachts on boat ponds (all of which have now been filled in for health and safety reasons), rode donkeys, and played games for pennies on the pier. Is it just nostalgia when you know in your heart that things really were better back then?
If you oppose all progress, the conspirators will label you a ‘Luddite’, even though much of what they call progress is no progress at all.
It’s not hard to argue that children today have little or no future. The conspirators and their allies have robbed them of their education, their hope, their sense of comfort, and even their happiness. Mental health problems among young people are increasing at an unprecedented rate. Even before the 2020 fake pandemic, the incidence of such problems among young people was alarmingly high. Today, there is a mental illness epidemic. Millions of children, teenagers, and young adults are taking tranquilizers and antidepressants (despite proven ineffective), often for years at a time. Lockdowns, social distancing rules, and the partial or complete closure of hospital wards mean that people who need specialized care will spend years, if not their entire lives, on waiting lists.
These ten things will happen if the conspirators tighten the screw
Is a pub with a fireplace and friendly bar staff better than one with a good internet connection? Are highways, with endless traffic jams, better than winding country lanes that get you to your destination just as quickly and with much more enjoyment? Are self-driving cars better than cars that need to be driven? How will self-driving cars navigate country lanes and all those small, blind intersections? Who will provide adequate roadside assistance for all the electric cars that get stranded on country lanes when their batteries run out? What happens to old, unwanted electric cars when their batteries are flat and too expensive to replace?
Is a traditional English breakfast better or worse than a bowl of sugar-coated cereal? Why does it take a week or more for a postcard to reach its destination today, while in the Victorian era of the 19th century, a postcard dropped into a mailbox in the morning would arrive by the afternoon? The postcode was undoubtedly an early sign of the end of civilization. I recently bought about 1,000 old Edwardian postcards (no one wants them these days – they only cost a few pounds), and although the addresses consisted of nothing more than (at most) a name, a number, a street, and a town, the cards clearly arrived safely. There’s less mail these days because so many people use email – so why does it take so long for mail to arrive?
Is reading a book on a smartphone easier and more enjoyable than reading a paperback—without having to squint and constantly adjust the screen position on a sunny day? Were charities more or less inclusive when they served only to help people in need instead of enriching executives and advertising agencies? Was life better when we used pay phones instead of having to carry a mobile phone? Were radio and television programs worse when traditional events like the Promenade Concerts celebrated cultural traditions instead of global ones?
Was the Tate Britain art gallery better off when it focused more on traditional artists than on the demands of the woke movement? The Tate Britain gallery now has only one room dedicated to art from 1545 to 1640, but 14 rooms dedicated to art from 1940 onward. Of the works on display, 200 have been created since the turn of the millennium, and the works in the publicly funded gallery are carefully curated to ensure equal representation of men and women among living artists—regardless of their reputation or the value of their work. The modern art on display, which represents only a twentieth of the collection’s time span, takes up a quarter of the space. Both culture and history have been adapted to the demands of the conspirators and their supporters. Older images are labeled with images highlighting social injustice, colonial exploitation, and prejudice. The gallery seems to illustrate how the sentiments of a small group now dominate the views of the majority in every field.
The goal of the World Economic Forum and other organizations seems to me to be to destroy every nation’s heritage, to destroy every country’s culture. In the United Kingdom, all the major institutions seem to have become very “woke.” The National Trust, Marylebone Cricket Club, and other former institutions are now unrecognizably “woke”—much to the confusion of longtime members. Long-established regiments in the army have disappeared or merged. It’s the same everywhere in the world. Everything is the same everywhere in the world. Governments are acting in unison.
The conspirators’ goal is to change the world by erasing nations, families, and communities, and destroying everything people consider personal and valuable. Immigration (legal or illegal) is encouraged to create poverty, resentment, racism, terrorism, and numerous excuses for war. (As an aside, patriotism used to be considered a good thing, but nationalism a bad thing. Today, however, both are unacceptable, as countries are not permitted in the New World Order.)
Of course, immigration programs have led to resentment on both sides, and especially in France and the United Kingdom, the development of racial and cultural ghettos leads to civil war. It’s the same everywhere.
There are controversies about gender (with insane changes to gender language introduced solely to sow confusion and destroy human relationships), transgender politics (also designed to sow confusion and create division), and over-the-top campaigns against sexual abuse (‘He said my hair looked nice’, ‘He said he liked my dress’, ‘My life is now ruined’).
The conspirators have deliberately created division, mistrust, and fear between the sexes, and the neoliberals who run the global economic system have consistently shown that their goal is not to create greater justice or advance women’s rights in countries where injustice is rife, but to sow as much division as possible between men and women.
The goal of the neoliberals who are part of the establishment, pushing us toward their beloved Great Reset, is to tear society apart in as many ways as possible, so that men and women are too busy fighting each other to worry about progress toward the New World Order. For precisely the same reason, national history and national and regional culture are being banished from all aspects of life, and schools and colleges no longer teach their students any material that could be construed as patriotic or in any way foster greater pride. Progress means that students are not taught to think, but merely bombarded with propaganda.
I’ve had enough of progress, thank you. I’d like to turn back the clock and save our lost civilization.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/ze-noemen-dit-vooruitgang-laat-me-niet-lachen