Zion Don: The Completion of U.S. Zionization
The second Trump administration marks the definitive endpoint of a long-evident zionization of the United States. By zionization, I mean the process by which U.S. governmental institutions, from the executive branch to Congress to state and local governments, systematically prioritize the security, territorial ambitions, and narrative control of Israel and its Jewish supporters over American constitutional principles, fiscal accountability, and national sovereignty. Emblematically, Israel recently rolled out the slogan for its parasitic domination of the United States: “Fifty States, One Israel.”
This phenomenon did not begin with Trump. It built on decades of incremental concessions and numerous acts of Zionist sabotage and criminality. However, Trump’s return to power accelerated and finalized this infiltration and takeover, turning the U.S. government into a de facto extension of Israeli statecraft. Billions in aid disbursed with no strings attached, media platforms consolidated under Zionist ownership, deportations calibrated to target anti-genocide advocates, and public statements from administration officials that frame Israel’s imperatives as unassailable moral duties—all these elements have converged to embed Zionist interests within the core of U.S. governance.
Trump’s role in this completion was central. As president, he has positioned himself not as an equal partner but as a mere facilitator of Israeli objectives at the expense of American autonomy. His administration’s actions in 2025 have revealed a level of deference that exceeds all previous administrations. The America-first mask has come off, revealing the Zionist identity beneath. Trump now serves as an Israeli satrap charged with managing Israel’s western-most branch. Whatever the deep state is, it operates according to Zionist desiderata and ideology.
In the process of this infiltration and assimilation, America has been consumed and remade in the image of Israel. Congressional maneuvers, media acquisitions, international defenses, propaganda initiatives, United Nations vetoes, executive orders, speeches, defense pact revisions, public posts by Trump and officials, and judicial findings from American Association of University Professors v. Rubio all evince Zionism’s lock on U.S. policy.
Military arms and funding represent the most concrete and quantifiable form of servility: direct transfers of American wealth and weaponry that have enabled Israel’s war crimes in the genocide in Gaza. By the time the Trump administration committed an additional $14 billion in aid in early 2025, the genocide in Gaza had become starkly apparent. International organizations, including the United Nations and Amnesty International, documented systematic violations: well over 67,000 Palestinians killed (with some estimates in the 300,000 range or more), including targeted strikes on refugee camps, schools, and medical facilities that left thousands orphaned and maimed. The blockade imposed by Israel, with U.S.-supplied surveillance technology, induced famine, with reports of children dying from malnutrition while aid convoys were bombed. This funding directly enabled those horrors, supplying the precision-guided bombs and drone swarms that leveled entire blocks, the artillery shells that shredded families in their homes, and the fuel for tanks that barreled through civilian areas.
The administration’s $14 billion surge in funding ignored these realities, prioritizing Israel’s “right to defend itself” over calls for ceasefires or investigations of war crimes. On February 7, 2025, Trump notified Congress of $8.4 billion in arms sales to Israel, paid for by U.S. aid, encompassing Foreign Military Sales and Direct Commercial Sales packages loaded with munitions explicitly earmarked for Gaza operations. These included 2,000-pound bombs and artillery rounds that Human Rights Watch later linked to strikes on densely populated areas, killing hundreds in single incidents. In September, an additional $6.4 billion request followed for attack drones, and supporting equipment was rushed through Senate committees, despite documented use of similar U.S.-supplied weapons in attacks on hospitals like Al-Shifa, where over 500 patients and staff perished. These approvals diverted funds from American needs—such as veteran care or disaster relief—while ensuring Israel’s arsenal remained replenished, even as Gaza’s infrastructure collapsed under the weight of U.S.-enabled bombardment.
This pattern has extended to logistical support for Israel’s operations. The administration advanced a September House bill to expand the War Reserve Stock for Allies-Israel (WRSA-I), a prepositioned depot of U.S. munitions stored within Israel for immediate access. The measure allowed unlimited withdrawals, essentially with no congressional oversight, granting Israel direct control over American munitions reserves for deployment in Gaza and potential escalations elsewhere. By late September, Israel had drawn down over $1 billion from WRSA-I for Gaza alone, using it to resupply amid depleted stocks from its prolonged onslaught. This arrangement not only bypassed standard arms export controls but also positioned U.S. stockpiles as an extension of Israel’s military, reducing Washington’s leverage and exposing American assets to Israeli command without reciprocal accountability.
The Gaza Strip takeover plan further illustrates this servility—Trump’s 20-point “peace” proposal for the Gaza Strip. Under this plan, the Gaza International Transitional Authority (GITA)—an interim international administration led by former UK Prime Minister and war criminal Tony Blair—would oversee Gaza’s reconstruction and governance post-genocide. GITA would manage funding and redevelopment until the Palestinian Authority completes reforms, excluding direct Palestinian input and focusing on Israeli security guarantees. Blair, as top administrator, would chair a “Board of Peace” with Trump, coordinating with Israel, Arab states, and donors for a five-year mandate emphasizing demilitarization of Hamas and supposed economic revival.
Israel and multiple Arab nations endorsed the outline, and Trump delivered an ultimatum to Hamas for capitulation or elimination. This initiative matches Israel’s expansionist objectives precisely, deploying American assets to extend Tel Aviv’s territorial control while framing it as a “humanitarian” effort to “demilitarize” the area. Of course, no mention is made of Israel’s demilitarization. The plan’s acceptance by Israel highlighted the administration’s role as enabler, providing the diplomatic cover and logistical backing for ethnic cleansing.
Congressional escapades provide additional proof of Zionist infiltration and control. The administration financed summer 2025 “fact-finding” visits to Israel for 57 Republicans and 23 Democrats, using these journeys to mold legislators into AIPAC golem. AIPAC’s United Democracy Project allocated $25 million in 2024 primaries to eliminate opponents like Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman, guaranteeing Senate dismissal of a July arms prohibition and endorsement of $3.3 billion in extra 2026 aid. These steps showed how lobby funding has transformed legislative autonomy into standard ratification of Israeli demands. The summer trips, organized by AIPAC and the American Israel Education Foundation, exposed lawmakers to curated narratives of Israeli “resilience” and “security needs,” with participants like House Speaker Mike Johnson returning to champion aid bills that ignored Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. This cycle of funding, travel, and voting ensured Congress functioned as an extension of the lobby, approving measures like the WRSA-I expansion without debate on the risks of entangling the U.S. in Israeli escalations.
In mid-September 2025, a record delegation of 250 U.S. state legislators from all 50 states attended the “Fifty States, One Israel” conference in Jerusalem, hosted by Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs from September 14 to 16—the largest such group to visit the country. The event featured curated tours of Jewish holy sites, speeches by Prime Minister and war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, and discussions on economic ties and security cooperation. This confab exemplifies zionization, funneling American state lawmakers through a lobby-orchestrated pipeline to internalize Israel’s narrative of existential threats and unbreakable alliance, ensuring that state-level policies—especially anti-BDS laws—align with Zionist priorities.
Media integration under administration facilitation represents another cornerstone of zionization. The government permitted Larry Ellison’s $14-billion purchase of TikTok’s U.S. division in September, situating him to modify algorithms that mute Gaza coverage previously influencing young Americans against Israel. The $8.4-billion Skydance-Paramount merger in August yielded Ellison’s son David Ellison oversight of CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon, and Paramount+ streaming, with pro-Israel and rabid Zionist Bari Weiss slated for editorial command of CBS News. A $40-billion offer for Warner Brothers’ Discovery channel arrived by autumn, with the Ellisons absorbing CNN, HBO, and Discovery to surpass Disney in extent. Larry Ellison is the largest individual direct donor to the IDF, having given at least $350 million, siphoned through Tony Blair’s institute. Combined with Safra Catz’s position as Oracle leader and Trump advisor, the Ellisons’ media take-overs have established a Zionist media mega-monopoly, suppressing opposition. Even FAIR has denounced it as “one-party media” produced by MAGA and Jewish funding.
Congress approved this merger wave, omitting antitrust evaluation under Trump pressure. The Department of Justice hastened approvals, holding no hearings on the danger of a Zionist media monopoly. Ellison’s Israeli links and lobby support assured the takeover sequence advanced without obstruction, converting TikTok from a channel of Palestinian reporting into a hasbara bubble. Politicians accumulated AIPAC contributions, allowing Ellison’s surveillance network—a global data collection for “public tracking”—to expand without restraint.
The impact has been immediate: TikTok’s algorithmic alterations have reduced Gaza-related videos by 70 percent in the first month, per Media Matters analysis, while CBS, under new management, aired 40 percent more pro-Israel segments, completely silencing the opposition to Zionism.
The administration’s international defenses of Israel range from full-scale material support to blanket diplomatic cover, shielding the Jewish state from global repercussions for its crimes against humanity. It defended Israel’s criminal June airstrikes on Iran during Trump’s supposed Oman negotiations, which turned out to be a psyop meant to put Iran off-guard while Israel finalized its plans for the unprovoked attacks. The U.S. took the blame for the escalation while Israel faced no sanctions, underscoring the administration’s obsequiousness to Netanyahu and company. Trump soon acquiesced to Israel’s demands and bombed Iranian nuclear facilities.
Propaganda initiatives have further embedded this homage on the domestic front. The administration dismantled the DOJ’s Foreign Influence Task Force on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s inaugural day, enabling Israel’s “Esther Project” to compensate influencers $6,100 to $7,300 per social media entry for pro-Israel outreach to Generation Z through Bridge Partners and Havas Media, circumventing Foreign Agents Registration Act obligations. This project, launched in early 2025, generated over 10,000 posts on platforms like Instagram and TikTok, reaching 500 million impressions, with content framing Israel’s Gaza operations as “defensive” and Palestinian resistance as “terrorism.”
The United Nations actions extended this protection globally, thanks to U.S. vetoes. The U.S. has rejected over 50 resolutions hostile to Israel since 2000, prolonging this practice in 2025 to hinder Gaza truces or responsibility inquiries. In March, it vetoed a Security Council resolution for an immediate ceasefire, citing “Israel’s right to self-defense,” despite reports of 30,000 civilian deaths at the time. April saw another veto on an investigation into alleged war crimes, with Ambassador Stefanik declaring the move “unacceptable bias against our ally.” These vetoes, numbering five in 2025 alone, isolated the U.S. from allies like the EU and blocked accountability for Israel’s actions, ensuring that Tel Aviv could operate with impunity.
Executive orders codified this prioritization. The administration issued 26 Day One orders, including EO 14188 combating “anti-Semitism” by deporting campus critics, EO 14149 ending “indoctrination” while shielding Israeli narratives, and EO 14161 revoking statuses for “hostile attitudes” toward Jewish principles, all attuned to AIPAC and Christians United for Israel requirements. EO 14188, in particular, mandated federal agencies to inventory “campus anti-Semitism” complaints post-October 7, leading to visa revocations for over 200 non-citizens by June, as documented in State Department cables. These orders reframed U.S. domestic policy around Israeli security concerns, treating Palestinian advocacy as a national threat and abridging the First Amendment rights of people residing in the U.S. (Yes, non-citizens in the U.S. do have First Amendment protections.)
Court determinations in American Association of University Professors v. Rubio recently unveiled the depths of Zionist infestation and rot. The Trump administration, the ruling declared, established an “ideological deportation policy” that expelled non-citizens for pro-Palestinian activism, conflating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism and Hamas support to “protect Jewish students” from “hostile environments,” thereby elevating Israeli foreign policy above U.S. constitutional rights. Homeland Security Investigations’ Tiger Team relied on Canary Mission—a pro-Israel blacklist with 5,000-plus dossiers on “haters of Israel and Jews”—for deportation leads, deferring to a Jewish advocacy group over independent probes. The court held Rubio and Noem responsible for evidence-free approvals, coordinating with Miller to suppress speech and assembly in service of “U.S. foreign policy,” fully backing Israel’s stance against Palestinian solidarity. Referrals equated protests with “anti-Semitic activities,” using EO 14188 to justify deportations advancing bilateral ties by muting U.S. dissent. No “compelling adverse foreign policy consequences” existed in cases like Chung and Khalil, yet Rubio approved deportation based on “indicating support for terrorists.” Watson’s labels of “Hamas sympathizers” for non-violent acts aligned deportations with Israel’s terrorism equivalence, fostering “solidarity” with Jewish students to bolster U.S.-Israel relations. Rubio approved deportations without reviewing underlying reports or evidence, relying on Homeland Security Investigations’ referrals that echoed pro-Israel talking points like “undermining U.S. foreign policy” through Palestinian advocacy, showing automatic alignment with Jewish state interests. The policy created a “chilling effect” on non-citizen speech, with professors like Al-Ali and Nickel self-censoring to avoid reentry harassment, serving Israel’s interest by suppressing U.S. academic discourse on Palestinian issues. Rubio’s deportations were “pure fiat” without evidence, the ruling held, based on “vaporous standards” like “indicating support,” to align U.S. immigration with Israel’s anti-BDS and anti-Palestinian activism stance. The 1,000-analyst Tiger Team, redirected from counterterrorism, focused solely on pro-Palestinian leads from Canary Mission, diverting U.S. security resources to protect Jewish student “dignity” and Israeli foreign policy.
These measures—arms distributions, lobby placements, media integrations, judicial revelations—have finalized the zionization. Trump’s administration does not simply back Israel; it has internalized its demands into American governmental structures, from munitions depots to broadcast networks to expulsion rosters. The price: billions depleted, opposition penalized, self-rule obliterated. The gainer: a foreign entity’s unhinged territorial expansion and domination, contingent on complete control over U.S. politics, with U.S. leaders as complicit enablers. This is not an alliance; it’s an incorporation, the Zionist subordination and subsumption of the U.S. government.
To expand on the military dimension, consider the broader implications of the $38 billion package. This sum, the largest single commitment in U.S. history to a foreign military, included not only the $14 billion emergency aid but also ongoing deliveries of F-35 jets, Iron Dome interceptors, and precision-guided munitions. By early 2025, when the genocide in Gaza was fully documented—with satellite imagery showing 80 percent of the strip’s buildings damaged or destroyed, and reports from Médecins Sans Frontières detailing the deliberate targeting of aid workers—the administration ignored calls from allies like the European Union for conditional aid. Instead, it certified Israel’s compliance with U.S. human rights laws under Leahy Law provisions, a certification later challenged in federal courts as fraudulent. The $8.4 billion February notification covered 500 MK-84 bombs and 1,000 GBU-39 small-diameter bombs, weapons Amnesty International linked to strikes on Rafah refugee camps in March, killing 45 civilians in one incident alone. The September $6.4 billion drone package arrived as Israel intensified operations in northern Gaza, where U.S.-supplied Hellfire missiles were used in targeted killings that often resulted in civilian casualties, as verified by UN investigators. These transfers were not defensive; they fueled an offensive that displaced 1.9 million Palestinians, destroyed 70 percent of agricultural land, and caused a cholera outbreak from contaminated water sources bombed with American explosives. The administration’s rationale—”Israel’s right to self-defense”—ignored the complete asymmetry, with Israel’s military budget exceeding $24 billion annually, bolstered by U.S. aid, against Hamas’s $100 million.
The WRSA-I expansion amplified this dependency. Valued at $4.4 billion in prepositioned stock by 2024, the bill sought to double it to $8.8 billion, stocking sites near Gaza with 155mm artillery shells and 2,000-pound bombs for “contingency operations.” Israel withdrew $1.2 billion in 2025 for Gaza resupply, per Defense Department logs, allowing seamless continuation of bombardments that leveled Khan Younis in July, killing 300 in a single day. Congressional oversight was nominal—a 30-day review period with no veto mechanism—ensuring Israel’s access without U.S. approval, a concession no other ally receives.
The Gaza Strip takeover plan is built on this foundation. The 20-point proposal, drafted with Israeli input, proposed U.S.-led “stabilization” forces to oversee reconstruction, effectively annexing the Gaza Strip under American auspices while Israel retains security control. The displacement clause echoes the Nakba of 1948, forcing Palestinians into Jordanian or Egyptian “humanitarian corridors,” with U.S. troops enforcing borders. Accepted by Israel on September 25, it came after Trump’s ultimatum to Hamas, threatening “total destruction.” This plan serves Israel’s demographic goals, eliminating Palestinians while U.S. involvement provides legal cover against international courts.
Appointments transitioned from material to human capital, embedding Israeli priorities in U.S. leadership. Rubio’s State role focused on “zero tolerance” for BDS supporters, leading to visa denials for 150 Palestinian activists in the second quarter of 2025. Noem’s Homeland Security tenure saw “jihadist” labels applied to 300 campus protesters, justifying National Guard deployments at universities. Miller’s advisory position extended family separation policies to Palestinian deportees, while Lyons’ ICE oversaw 200 expulsions tied to pro-Palestine rallies. Huckabee’s ambassadorship pushed for Golan Heights annexation recognition, and Stefanik’s UN post vetoed three Gaza resolutions in six months.
Congressional junkets and spending perpetuated this. The 80-lawmaker Israel trip in July cost $2 million, featuring Netanyahu briefings that shaped votes for the $3.8 billion in aid. AIPAC’s $25 million primary purge removed eight critics, ensuring 95 percent of Congress co-sponsored pro-Israel bills. The Senate’s July embargo rejection, 82-18, followed AIPAC calls, with trip attendees leading the tally.
Media acquisitions consolidated narrative control. Ellison’s TikTok stake has altered feeds, reducing Gaza visibility by 65 percent, per Pew. The Paramount merger brought CBS under Zionist influence, with Weiss eliminating Al Jazeera rebroadcasts. Warner’s bid promised CNN “balance,” meaning pro-Israel tilt. DOJ approvals ignored FTC concerns, citing “national security” tied to Israeli tech. The Esther Project evaded FARA, paying 500 influencers for 10,000 posts reaching 1 billion views, framing Gaza as “self-defense.” These acts have completed the zionization—extorting billions, threatening our rights, and signaling the loss of national sovereignty.
We now live under ziocracy. The U.S. is occupied and the occupation of Palestine will not end, the Israeli attacks on Palestinians and other neighbors will continue, and Israel will continue to hold us hostage, until the Zionist occupation of America is overthrown.
That’s why I founded AZAPAC, the Anti-Zionist America PAC, the first and only explicitly anti-Zionist organization in America. Please support our efforts to dezionize the U.S. government.