A Cheer for an Honest Brown Man
White survival depends on having a clearly defined white identity. Great damage has occurred from the intentional blurring of the boundaries between the races. Too often, otherwise reasonable whites have been lulled to think there are no such boundaries. They commit fuzzy thinking such as “not all of them are like that,” “we all want the same things,” “diversity is our strength,” “the colorblind meritocratic society is the fairest,” and so on. They believe that if we all mix together we will eliminate the animosity between peoples. White advocates can counter such fallacies with all manner of arguments and statistical, scientific and historical facts, all of them adhering to high standards of empirical truth and logic, and still make slow headway in the attempts to demonstrate the differences between peoples and to restore our common identity.
People need to know not only which side they are on, but that different sides even exist. Otherwise, the task of waking white people up to the existential threat they face is much more difficult. The entire mainstream culture, along with the extreme left, has devoted considerable energy to making sure awareness of the differences that separate us does not emerge—at least among the white population (for non-whites, the divisions between whites and all others a continually stoked.)
Part of this intentional blurring has misled people about the real reasons people come to the United States. Many whites are mentally stuck in the distant past, thinking that new immigrants overwhelmingly wish to become Americans, to adopt our ways and assimilate. That belief is pretty much a joke today; people do not emulate those who are so obviously self-destructive. Often, the reasons people flood into the West today are purely economic; they rightfully see us as easy pickings since our government seems to favor them instead of the original founding stock and look the other way when they break laws.
If economic exploitation were the only reason they come, that alone would be cause enough to dam the flood of foreigners. But there is an even darker side to the current wave of migration. Many other immigrants, or their American-born offspring, are blatantly anti-American; they are fueled by a deep sense of Nietzschean ressentiment, with generations of feelings of rage and inferiority repressed by impotence. Now that whites are undergoing civilizational weakness and confusion, they see their opportunities for conquest and retribution.
Most Americans seem unaware of such attitudes, even though, every once in a while, somebody lets it slip that they have come here with bad intent. Central Americans publicly express their desire for a “Reconquista” of North America, but such comments do not make it into the mainstream. Occasionally a Muslim makes a declaration of jihad, but they are dismissed as being part of the fringe.
But the truth has a funny way of emerging into the spotlight despite the desires of the ruling classes. It may have passed out of the 24-hour-news-cycle, but it’s worth remembering what happend on Thanksgiving this year: a prominent Pakistani Muslim said the naughty parts out loud on X, and it didn’t just make the rounds of right-wing media and die there; it become viral and even some major news outlets picked it up. Wajahat Ali, a New York Times columnist, directed his comments directly to whites:
You are losers. You have lost. Your story is a shitty story filled with misery. It’s filled with bland chicken. It’s filled with terrible, terrible dry ass meat. Your music sucks. All your culture sucks. That’s why the kids like listen to black people and their music. That’s why the kids love Latinos. Your parties suck because they’re monochromatic. Our parties have better food, better music, better-looking women.
Ignore the way that he seems to have the intellectual depth of a C-minus high school student despite his lofty position at the Times. And ignore the way that, at times, he seemed to be directing his speech only to “white supremacists”; it was clear his animosity extended to all whites who are not in the Mamdani wing of the Democratic Party. It’s all there: the contempt, the superiority, the suggestion that his side has won the struggle for our nation. The desire for revenge drips from his tongue; he even resorts to hitting below the belt to dance on what he perceives to be the crushed egos of defeated white men:
Guess what? Some white women, you know, the Western Civilization women, the pure women, the Rust Belt women, the real women, they like some of us brown folks. We don’t take them, they come to us. And then we have kids, these beautiful caramel-skin kids. We’re here, you’ve lost.
Boiling down his rambling hour-long rant to its core, he may as well have said: “We brown people hate you. We have contempt for you, see you as inferior. We are taking your land from you, and you can’t stop us.”
By stating these things with such arrogance, such vehemence, such confidence, he has done the white rights movement a great service. He has given the racial boundary a new coat of paint and broadcast it to the entire nation.
Consider the New York Times audience who purportedly read his columns. It will be largely comprised of educated, prosperous white people in their middle years. They voted for Cuomo, not Mamdani (the Times stopped short of endorsing Cuomo but suggested that Mamdani was not ready for the job of mayor). They are the old Democratic Party, not the new party of AOC, Mamdani, and Ali. For some percentage of them, between the recent mayoral race that elevated a communist Indian Muslim to a position of high authority, and Ali’s comments that leave little room for alternate interpretations, the new reality that the newcomers are not our friends might be starting to sink in a bit.
Nobody should expect some mad rush to our side by huge numbers of the Northeast liberal elite, but for some, Ali’s comments, coming so quickly on the heels of Mamdani’s victory, might start a process of questioning long-held beliefs. And that is where our own march to victory gains strength. For, once that questioning process begins, the facts and reason may eventually lead some white New York Times readers and other similar people throughout the nation to a renewed sense of white identity. Remember that, within our own ranks there are many former liberals or leftists. Some are the most prominent among us: Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald, to start. And white New York Times readers have resources, educations, influence, and connections—very welcome additions to our cause, indeed.
It is also a positive sign that Ali is declaring victory already—before a significant number of our people have committed to fighting back. Perhaps, before taking his victory lap, he should recall that less than 100,000 British troops were able to control all of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Or that the Spanish conquered the Aztecs with 600 men. And recall Kipling’s foreboding words: “when the Saxon began to hate.”
But Ali seems possessed by his overwhelming case of ressentiment and could not hold his tongue. He assumes that our temporary weakness is permanent, that our total collapse is inevitable. Yet history has many strange twists and turns, and we are a resourceful people.
Another miscalculation made by Ali is that he sees all “brown people,” that is, all non-whites, as having some kind of universal brotherhood. The only thing that unites them now is a general sense of ressentiment toward whites; if Ali’s hopes are realized and whites are no longer the majority, hatred of whites will no longer be enough to hold his brown coalition together. They will no longer be able to satisfy their goals by taking resources and power away from whites and will be forced to compete with each other. Such competition will likely take some ugly turns. Perhaps the competing groups will then try to curry favor with whites for advantages against either—with great potential for our exploitation once whites realize that we have common interests.
Outbursts of hatred such as Ali’s are likely to become even more common in the near future; he is hardly the only brown newcomer who thinks like this. Some of them see our continual retreat and feel emboldened to speak out. Others feel threatened by the Trump administration’s sporadic attempts at pushback and become stressed into openly spewing their plans and fears.
And each time they speak their true thoughts, they mark the lines between us more starkly, revealing the deep divisions in interests, culture, and morality that naturally occur between peoples. This will make it easier for whites to see our true position—not as cooperative members of a joint venture for a brighter future, but as targets intended for repression and elimination.
Thank you, Wajahat Ali. Keep speaking out and letting whites know how things really are.
https://counter-currents.com/2025/12/a-cheer-for-an-honest-brown-man