A Demand for Freedom
The question on my mind, of late, is when do we recognize that the entire Western world is involved in a war for freedom? What may have gone unnoticed in the recent past was the failed campaign of George Simion in Romania. Well, “failed campaign” might be misleading. Without any specific knowledge, Simion was leading in all the polls, by a good margin, before he lost to the globalist candidate Nicusor Dan.
Previously, Calin Georgescu’s campaign resulted in his victory, but the Supreme Court of Romania ruled that that election had been influenced by Russia and therefore nullified. His close ally, Simion picked up the banner and ran in the new election and somehow failed, not because, I believe, he didn’t get the votes, but because he openly supported Donald Trump and his populist nationalist style. The EU couldn’t have that, so Macron (France and Romania have a long history of working together) got involved and pushed hard for Nicusor Dan’s campaign. This has not been deemed disqualifying as “French interference”, but it should have. If Putin’s influence, of which I’m uncertain that it took place, could disqualify the previous election, why doesn’t Macron’s interference disqualify this one? Because the EU got what it wanted, a willing conspirator at the head of government, an EU sychophant.
The globalists have been exerting their election-rigging tactics all over the globe, pushing nations in Europe closer and closer to the totalitarian mindset of Brussels. It’s a dangerous time. They have already proved that the voice of the people, the demand for freedom, will not be tolerated in the EU.
Currently, there is an election taking place in Poland, where the Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski faces Karol Nawrocki. Just as in the Romanian election, this is between the mayor of the capitol city and a US-aligned populist.
The bigger issue is the globalist-dominated EU meddling in national politics to retain its totalitarian hold on the member states. These are the tactics of the globalists that were exerted against Donald Trump. In some cases it’s lawfare or judicial coups. Assassination as a tactic has already been used in Brazil against Bolsanaro, after they used lawfare, after they rigged the election. They can’t have it. The successes in El Salvador and Argentina show that nations can transform themselves from the totalitarian trash heap. Both Milei in Argentina and Bukele in El Salvador have taken inspiration from the populism of the first Trump campaign and provided inspiration to the second by proving that the formula works.
In Argentina, the horrible debt and government bloat was axed and rises now as an economic success. In El Salvador, the widespread corruption and criminality that plagued the nation has been brought under control by imprisoning the guilty and impeaching its crooked judges.
So, whether one hates Trump, loves him or sees him as a necessary transformative figure, the fight is worldwide. Politicians reflect the will of the people and all of these seemingly close elections provide a vision of a world that has seen failures in Britain, France and Ireland and are waking up to the alarms. Trump is someone who brings out the resistance in these other nations and for that alone, it’s important that he continue his work.
Illegal immigration, or forced immigration in Britain is not just a social issue, but a fiscal one as well. Wherever these immigrants go, they overwhelm the delicate social benefits systems and bankrupt their nations. This is one reason the EU promotes the war in Ukraine, it accelerates the economic destruction that can be used as an excuse to move to the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that will enable complete economic slavery over their populations.
This is the totalitarian push and most populations realize it, this is why the rise of nationalist populist candidates are mounting considerable challenges to the status quo and where successful they garner massive popularity. It also brings out the worst aspects of totalitarianism, violence and control, the overthrow of the will of their peoples and punishments for speaking out.
I have, over a period of time, been criticized for my use of the words “communist and communism,” though that has lessened of late when it’s become more apparent. It has been argued that it’s not really communism, because there are capitalistic tendencies within those structures that preclude communism. Yes, but that’s not taking communism as two wings of the same bird, but as a whole, a binary choice, when it is not. I’m talking about recognizing that communism can be split in half, part political, part economic. This is how the current communists in China see it. Why not slice off the economic part that doesn’t work while maintaining the ultimate control and power of the political part?
In the US, the political part is a republic and that might change to a democracy or even communism as it has actually morphed into a bureaucratic dictatorship, but the economic aspect remains largely the same, though communist regulations work to bring industry and commerce under political influence, i.e., a form of communism.
It’s time to recognize that Europe is slipping behind a new Iron Curtain, not instituted by the Soviet Union, but by the European Union through totalitarian control of the nation states. Hungary’s leadership of Victor Orban has refused to go along with some of the more socially destructive aspects of the EU, especially resisting forced immigration and the LGBT agenda. For this, he has been vilified and ostracized by Brussels that now proposes to sanction Hungary for their exertion of sovereignty.
We will be covering this angle in our upcoming documentary Deconstruction: The Worldwide Demand for Freedom. Much different from Lies of Omission, this one will take a wider view. Where Lies of Omission attempted to awaken the domestic audience, Deconstruction will attempt to link the the several efforts together as a single effort, the most freedom to the most amount of people. Where that might require a world war in previous times, the liberation of all nations is the ultimate goal.
This time, we have secured distribution, a theatrical release and have prepared to accept financing from the traditional means rather than requesting others in this community to help us do it. The environment is completely different from the last effort. Conservative films have a good track record of making their investors money and garnering an audience that in 2016 (when we began filming Lies of Omission) simply did not exist. We struggled for years to get anyone to distribute it. This also has an international audience of those who seek such films in those and other nations under the yoke of the EU.