Boomer Gatekeeping and Restore Britain
The majority of the boomer generation serve as a stop-valve for nationalism when it comes to the ballot box. A prime example of the boomer mentality can be seen in Nigel Farage’s recent speech at a Reform UK conference, during which he stated in no uncertain terms that the deportation of ethnic communities and their denaturalising is unconscionable. The following statement [1] was made in relation to Rupert Lowe’s expulsion from Reform UK and the subsequent frame-up job of Mr. Lowe carried out by Zia Yusuf and Nigel Farage that culminated in Mr. Lowe’s farm being visited by armed police [2].
“Does he have a profile on X? Yes, he does. Is Elon going to support him? Probably. But you see; when he stood up and said that… We’ve got to consider the mass deportation of entire communities, including those born in the United Kingdom… That just moves way beyond of reasonableness, of decency, of morality; a-and that was the moment at which, I realised that we just had to get rid of him. And get rid of him as quickly as we could…”
– Nigel Farage
According to Nigel Farage (who we can reasonably assume is supported by the majority of “right-wing” boomers in the United Kingdom on account of the Daily Mail supporting him), placing the safety of the English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish people is beyond reasonableness, decency and morality. This is the general consensus among his right-wing detractors since his statement. On the other hand, in order for this argument to be made solid we must analyse the scope of non-White complicity in the hate crimes committed against White men, women and children.
It is now common knowledge that the families and communities of Muslim rapists – families that have likely lived in the UK for 2-3 generations – assisted in the covering up of millions of vile acts committed against White women and girls of the British Isles [3]. It is common knowledge that Islamic teachings forbid opposition to Prophet Mohamed’s teachings as laid out in the Sunnah [4]; this alone should justify the forced uprooting of those culpable families/communities that were born in the United Kingdom, regardless of how many generations back they date, regardless of how much they allegedly contribute to the economy. It’s not only reasonable, it is decent, moral and necessary. As a matter of fact, it’s more than decent, it is downright mercy; for we would be justified in requesting the death penalty for all perpetrators, co-conspirators, and civil servants that looked the other way. The same goes for the many non-Muslim immigrants and problematic legals; black males from Sudan, Somalia etc. that have also abused, attacked and raped with relative impunity.
To further illustrate Reform UK’s lack of care for White Britons becoming a minority, thus eventually having democracy turn against them as caused by a change in demographics, you need only look at their policies. Zia Yusuf has proposed to deport a mere 330,000 a year [5]. In 2017 the Greater London Authority estimated that the number of illegal immigrants was not far over 750,000 when including children born of illegal immigrants. This was the number nine years ago, so not only is Reform UK’s immigration policy working with figures that are shockingly out of date by nine years, even if the number was around 750,000 the proposed plan would take over two years to complete even if you closed the borders and deported those born of illegal immigrants as well, which is something Nigel Farage whinges about being beyond reasonableness, decency and morality. Furthermore, where are Reform’s policies addressing the problem of declining White British birthrates, unaffordable living, lack of employment opportunities, suffering farmers, the anti-British law apparatus? It’s not enough to deport people who shouldn’t be in Britain, you need to provide solutions to the problems facing the native people that have been caused by mass immigration, DEI and rabid left-wing quangos. Despite Reform’s attempts to demonise the necessary, the fact remains that millions must go and policies concerning the resolving of the decline of White British birthrates, affordable living, employment, agriculture, and a law apparatus that has been weaponised against the native population, need to be prioritised.
Is it therefore any wonder that supporters and councillors are defecting from Reform UK to Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain party? When a political leader isn’t ostensibly disgusted enough by what has happened to his own people that he believes deporting those responsible is beyond reasonableness, decency and morality, and doesn’t have a plan for solving the demographic and economic problems faced by his own people, what does that say about his moral compass? What does it say about his character? What does it say about his patriotism? It says that he’s: (a) riddled with fear of breaching the post-war liberal consensus; (b) being blackmailed; (c) a political opportunist trying to slither his way into the establishment, or (d) been an establishment stooge from the start. For Nigel Farage, any of the aforesaid explanations could be true, but for most boomers it is down to fear of questioning the post-war narrative regarding the West, consequently having to confront their own hubris.
The Post-War Narrative of the West
The post-war narrative postulates that the West must atone for its history of violence and subjugation by: (1) adopting multiculturalism; (2) reducing is own people to second-class citizens which must surrender their status, resources, opportunities et al and transfer them to those on non-European ancestry as forms of reparation; (3) opposing any form of nationalism that borders on ethnicity; (4) retconning its own history and accomplishments; (5) relentlessly attacking traditional notions regarding gender, religion and family structure; (6) establishing a two-tier justice system in which white people that demonstrate a lack of white guilt are punished more harshly; (7) continuing to abide by centralised systems of banking that are designed to hold the West at the mercy of Epstein-like networks that can commit thievery, blackmail, usury and engineer economic disasters through fractional reserve banking, quantitative easing and other such insidious economic practices that damage the fabric of Western civilisation.
As you can imagine, there’s a lot of dangerous people, networks and collegiums behind the perpetuation of the post-war narrative – nevertheless, what most boomers fears most is the rocking of the boat and the idea that they were wrong. When they hear the uncowed white man or woman speak of mass remigration; ethnic distinctions; love for their own people and country; and for the past glories of their civilisation, they know that such beliefs will lead to the collapse of the post-war liberal consensus and the end of their stable, albeit enslaved life will follow. When the old and young guard of politicians, statesman, civil servants, academics, activists and money-men that have been positioned to hold back the rise of another monolithic Europe sense that the damn is going to break, they will start burning it to the ground, metaphorically speaking (for the most part).
Evidence of this can be presented in the establishment party of Labour taking a sledgehammer to Britain. They once believed in something, even though it was something I opposed, but now they are making decisions and introducing policies that are breaking apart the fabric of British society plus betraying the values they once held as sacrosanct surrounding female rights, working class protections, employment and so on. This is what terrifies the majority of boomers – radical change, admitting they got it wrong. While the lion’s share of white millennial and Gen Z males are itching for the opportunity to join a worthy struggle, to prove themselves for people and country, boomers are trying to hold them back due to hubris and fear.
Perhaps this is why Rupert Lowe and his Restore Britain party have taken the right-wing by storm? Yes, his policies tick all the right boxes. Yes, he owns a farm and can thus empathise with British farmers. Yes, he launched a rape gang inquiry when no one else would. Yes, he has sworn to pursue private prosecutions for those complicit in the rape gang operation, even Members of Parliament. Yet, what resonated most with the young right-wing men that heard his message was that the fight to reclaim our country; deliver our people, will not be easy and it will be painful. Why did this resonate when for all intents and purposes a statement such as this is perceived as negative? The right-wing youth of today are emboldened by the ideas Ernst Jünger as to what constitutes manhood. They are captivated by the aesthetics of Europe’s historical struggles. They are enamoured with ancestral tales of heroism, glory and victory.
Jonathan Bowden once said the following: “Being white isn’t enough! Being British isn’t enough! Know what you are! To read about your own culture is a revolutionary act.” And so we did exactly that. We now know that it is not enough to be White, that it is not enough to be British. We know that we are ethnically English, Irish, Welsh or Scottish because we have done the revolutionary act of reading about our own culture; nay, more than that, the majority of us have worked tirelessly to transform ourselves in mind, body and spirit to become as close in similarity to our European ancestors as is possible for the conditions of our time. We don’t want flashy cars and cruises, we want the kind of purpose and possibility of glory that only a great struggle can present. This is what the establishment fails to understand. They cannot comprehend that some people actually want to suffer for their country, provided said suffering leads to the reclaiming of their nation’s greatness and the prosperity of their people.
Thus, try as they might to convince us that a great fight is elsewhere, we know exactly where it is. It’s right here; and should the political class decide for Britain to join the Russo-Ukrainian war or any other war not fought on British soil, the White straight males they have spent years dispossessing, marginalising, attacking, will not leave these lands only for our women, children and property to be further raped and pillaged by the third-world hordes that lie in wait within the hotels and ethnic communities.
Electoral Consequences
In terms of the electoral consequences of the boomer’s hubris and fear-motivated gatekeeping, it has been almost impossible for a genuine right-wing party to accumulate power in Europe for a very long time due to boomers voting in terms of keeping out “the left”, choosing the best of a rotten bunch, or believing that pseudo right-wing parties were the most likely to win. In Britain, boomers used to believe that the Conservative party was right-wing, but they never stopped to ask themselves what exactly the Tories are trying to conserve. The answer is the post-war liberal consensus, for they have advocated and perpetuated mass immigration, multiculturalism, reducing its own people to second-class citizens, and the rest of it. Eventually, the boomers woke up. With the establishment realising that they had indeed become wise to their tricks it attempted a bait-and-switch with Reform UK, only they couldn’t help but repeat the same tactics as before. After several Conservative defections, the welcoming of Muslim candidates as well as their appointments to immigration-concerning roles, and the watering down of anti-immigration rhetoric, the mask was starting to slip. With Farage’s admitting that he removed Mr. Lowe for political reasons, not because he threatened violence against Zia Yusuf like Farage told the police, the mask fell even further. Now with Laila Cunningham, a Muslim and former prosecutor, having called Restore Britain’s immigration policy “Aryan” idealism and the party “neo-Nazi”, the mask has fallen off completely and Reform UK have been exposed as controlled opposition.
Despite this, there are still people attacking Restore Britain because they’re thinking along boomer lines. The more prevalent argument I have seen for not supporting Restore Britain is thus: “Don’t support Lowe. You’ll split the vote and the Greens will get in!” However, there is no “splitting the vote” as Reform UK have exposed themselves to be part of liberal consensus mafia, thus they are not right-wing. They may have been at one point, but they’re not now, so there is no right-wing vote to split because there is only one true right-wing party on offer: Restore Britain. As an additional note, the other independent right-wing parties such as Britain First have vowed to stand down candidates where Restore will be running, yet most Reform supporters still cannot see that other right-wing parties volunteering to commit this act IS the unification of the right-wing, a commitment not to split the vote. Whether this is because the bulk of Reform’s support is coming from legal minorities and mixed race persons instead of the White British is anyone’s guess, as I cannot fathom how you could view the actions and statements of Reform UK and think they are a party that represent the interests of the native British.
This is the grand summary of boomer gatekeeping and the post-war liberal consensus, a pesky demon that is making a last stand as we near what appears to be the final three-year chance for a legitimate political solution. Should Restore Britain be victorious, the rest of Europe will fall like dominos by the example set. Should they be defeated, I suspect that darker times await ahead because the Saxon has declared that “This isn’t fair dealing.” [6]
Do I think you should immediately leap to support Restore Britain? No. In Rupert Lowe’s own words a political party is not entitled to immediate support from the people because it must be earned, especially when the White British have been burned by politicians many times over. What I will say is that currently Restore Britain are on the right track. Should they continue to hold fast against the establishment’s attempts to pressure them into disavowing their nationalist/ethnonationalist supporter base, continue to proliferate the vows they have set forth without wavering, and Rupert Lowe continues his efforts to pursue justice for the rape gang victims, then I suspect the majority of nationalists/ethnonationalists that currently support Restore – or will later come to support them – will be fine with being referred to as “exuberant supporters” by Restore Britain’s representatives. It makes a nice change from being regarded as a disgraceful aspect of society that must be crushed at all costs, not that the majority of us are particularly bothered by such sentiments – “cultured thugs” and so on.
Restore Britain will be watched closely. Provided they do not succumb to the post-war liberal consensus – thus becoming part of the establishment or allies to it – come the next general election it is reasonable to postulate that they shall receive many votes from the nationalist/ethnonationalist block. If – and I stress “if” – there is still hope for a political solution, Restore Britain will be the final roll of the dice. Therefore, if Rupert Lowe and his party remain steadfast then maybe nationalists/ethnonationalists in Britain will be willing to risk the possibility of having to wear the “fell for it again” badge.
As for the elephant in the room regarding Rupert Lowe’s past pro-Israel tweets from circa 2024 and vocal support from known Zionist zealot Tommy Robinson? I’m not sure what to think at this point because while he did post those tweets he has also vowed to ban kosher slaughter. Additionally, he’s said that he doesn’t want Blackrock CEO Larry Fink taking property from the British people, and unlike Nigel Farage, has yet to openly vilify ethnonationalism [7]. Tommy may also be expressing support for Restore Britain on behalf of the establishment to draw away support from ethnonationalists, as it’s no secret that Tommy hates ethnonationalists and ethnonationalists hate him. Conversely, and somewhat unfortunately, Tommy commands a great deal of influence in terms of directing the actions of the right-wing working class in Britain, influence that can be easily converted to votes. At the same time Tommy has a history of trying to hijack nationalist movements and talking points, altering their messaging to convey mediocre counter-Jihadism and then conflating said movements with Zionism, such as the “Unite the Kingdom” march that took place last year for example. Needless to say, Tommy could prove to be a problem if Restore Britain allow him too close, i.e they would do well to remember Aesop’s fable ‘The Scorpion and the Frog’. [8]
Another point to bear in mind is that 21st century politics has always been divided by a false dichotomy that has only intensified due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That dichotomy states that if a politician opposes right-wing interests they have to support Muslim interests if they want to stand for left-wing interests, and if they oppose left-wing interests they have to support Jewish interests if they want to stand for right-wing interests. If a politician decides that they oppose both Muslim and Jewish interests and focus only on the interests of the native British people for example, Parliamentary Standards will take away their political power in Parliament, effectively locking them out of ever gaining political power. On special occasion, additional support mandates are added by Parliamentary Standards, such as support for COVID vaccinations, which saw former Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen lose the party whip for opposing the use of COVID vaccines [9]; moreover, he went against Jewish interests by comparing COVID mandates to the holocaust. This is a cardinal sin in politics because it is not permitted by the post-war liberal consensus to state that other world events were/are equivocal, or more severe, than the holocaust unless you use Palestine as an example, thereby adhering to the false dichotomy enforced by Parliamentary Standards and other such regulatory bodies inside Western governments.
The entire parliamentary “democratic” system is rotten and it is impossible for a political party to pursue a potential electoral victory without at least expressing a modicum of support for either Muslim or Jewish interests from time to time. Maybe this is cause enough for looking to secure the future of Britain and its native people through more unorthodox means, but just because something is mandated doesn’t mean that people necessarily agree with it. In terms of politics, if you believe that electoral victory is the only right and proper way, you have to look at what’s a priority for a politician and their party. Are they more concerned with native British interests or are they more concerned with Jewish interests? Do their policies benefit the native British more than the groups they are obligated to show support for? These are the questions that must be asked if you believe that victory is possible through the rotten system currently in place.
If, however, you have already abandoned hope for a “democratic” solution then focus on building local groups and network with other groups across the country doing the same. Provide safety to native British communities through arranging patrols, danger awareness seminars and self-defence training; offer various labour, educational and technical services, or volunteer to run errands for the elderly, injured and ill. Whichever deeds you choose to perform, make sure they are geared towards building real world networks in preparation for the inevitable ethnic balkanisation should Restore Britain lose the next general election – or be exposed as yet another bait-and-switch by the establishment. It’s a future most of our people fear because it will mean that they will have to face that the democratic process cannot save them; and in such a case – when the entire political class and law apparatus has been conquered by the influence of a foreign enemy that is ontologically evil – only two, incredibly difficult options will remain: leave Britain forever, or assemble the native English, Irish, Welsh and Scottish to apply collective pressure to the system through the native blocs that will emerge from the balkanisation process.
Sufficed to say, the [current] Restore Britain policy to watch acutely is the proposed prohibition of kosher slaughter. That’s the linchpin. If that is taken off the table, or watered down in any way, then we will know without question that all notions of securing victory via the ballot box must be abandoned.
References and footnotes:
1. Statement made by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage at the Reform conference. Video embedded within a post published on Connor Tomlinson’s Substack account, 2026.
Nigel Farage on kicking Rupert Lowe out of Reform:
2. M. Brown, C. Calgie and S. Brown, ‘Former Reform MP Rupert Lowe’s Gun Collection Seized from Cotswolds Farm’, Gloucestershirelive, 2025. https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/former-reform-mp-rupert-lowes-10083588
3. S. Ashworth-Hayes, C. Peters, ‘How the Grooming Gangs Scandal Was Covered Up’, The Telegraph, 2025. https://web.archive.org/web/20250104123556/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/04/grooming-gangs-scandal-cover-up-oldham-telford-rotherham/
4. The Sunnah, which is a series of tales regarding the Prophet Mohamed, serves as a practical guide and foundational book of law for Muslims to follow in Islam. Thus, the claim that not all Muslims support paedophilia is false, as Prophet Mohamed — according to passages from two of the six books that make up the Sunnah — took a wife by name of “Aisha” at the age of six and consummated the marriage at the age of nine.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5134: “The Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.”
Sahih Muslim 8:3310: Allah’s Apostle married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.”
It could be initially reasoned that each Muslim interprets the Sunnah differently or that Shia Muslims don’t follow it; however, the Shia still uphold the Sunnah and the Sunni Muslims vehemently support it because speaking ill of Prophet Mohamed or opposing his teachings is unconscionable in Islamic faith. This is mainly why Muslim communities protect child rapists and their leaders will never speak out against them (or in Sadiq Khan’s case deny they even exist). In summary, their religion states that there is nothing immoral about forcing children into sexual acts. When that is compounded with: (1) historical Islamic narratives that depict White women as promiscuous; (2) government and NGO support for mass immigration; (3) the European Convention for Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998; (4) political parties vying for Muslim votes; and (5) the “refugees welcome” culture of left-wing activists, the conditions have been set to enable the trafficking and rape of White British children on an industrial scale, which is exactly what happened and is still happening.
5. J. Elgot, Reform Would Create ICE-style agency and End leave to Remain, Zia Yusuf To Say, The Guardian, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/22/reform-uk-ice-style-agency-end-leave-to-remain-zia-yusuf
6. Quote taken from ‘The Norman and Saxon’ by Rudyard Kipling, stanza 2: “The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice and right. When he stands like an ox in the furrow with his sullen set eyes on your own, And grumbles, ‘This isn’t fair dealing,’ my son, leave the Saxon alone.”
7.Statement made by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage regarding ethnonationalism. GB News video embedded within a post published by “Charles Chevalier” on his Substack account.
8. In the story of ‘The Scorpion and the Frog’, a scorpion, naturally being unable to swim, asks a frog to carry it across a river. The frog logically hesitates, fearing the scorpion will sting it. The scorpion assures the frog that it wouldn’t harm it, for both would drown if the frog died while crossing. Convinced by this logic, the frog agrees. Yet, halfway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog. As the frog begins to sink, it asks, “Why did you do that? Now we will both die.” The scorpion replies, “It’s in my nature.”
9. P. Walker, Tory MP Andrew Bridgen Loses Whip Over ‘dangerous’ Covid Vaccine Claims, The Guardian, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jan/11/tory-mp-andrew-bridgen-loses-whip-over-covid-vaccine-comments
https://will2rise.substack.com/p/the-electoral-consequences-of-the