Davos vs. Humanity: The Technocratic Nightmare of Yuval Noah Harari
Whether it’s in Davos or at Bilderberg, a small group of thinkers and billionaires believe they can “reprogram” humanity. Harari’s words about a “technological ark” show how far this elite has already drifted from reality.
For years, critical observers have warned of a creeping disconnect between global power elites and the realities of the people who bear the consequences of their decisions. Politicians, business leaders, bankers, media magnates, and their favorite intellectuals gather in elite forums like the World Economic Forum (WEF) or Bilderberg meetings to “shape” the future – but increasingly, this future seems to be meant only for themselves .
Recent statements by Israeli historian and WEF luminary Yuval Noah Harari, reported by The WinePress platform , provide a shocking insight into the thinking of this new technocratic class.
The ‘Technological Noah’s Ark’ – For the Few Instead of All
Harari, a bestselling author and, according to the WEF, a “visionary of the future,” has repeatedly speculated in various interviews and lectures that the elite will build a kind of “technological Noah’s ark”—a refuge for those who can afford it when the environment, economy, and society finally collapse.
He says that “a small elite will survive” while most of humanity will become “redundant” – as artificial intelligence, automation and biotechnology replace all productive roles.
What sounds like philosophical science fiction to some is an alarming confession to many:
The elites are not preparing to save humanity – but themselves.
The hubris of the technocrats
Particularly bizarre – and symptomatic – is Harari’s alleged proposal that artificial intelligence should in the future “rewrite the Bible” to make it “more modern.”
Here the core of the technocratic ideology emerges: the belief that technology and algorithms know truth, morality, and meaning better than humans themselves.
This way of thinking runs like a thread through the Davos agenda:
- digitalization replaces ethics,
- control replaces trust,
- surveillance replaces responsibility.
The World Economic Forum sells this approach as “future management,” but in reality it is a global experiment on humanity – without its consent.
Dehumanization as a system error
Harari has repeatedly said that the majority of people in the new world order will become “useless” – a formulation that shockingly reveals how far removed from reality these thought bubbles are.
It’s the old ideology of dehumanization, this time disguised as progress:
Those who have no place in the elite system are considered redundant.
But here lies the most dangerous point: if those with power, capital, and influence think they can algorithmically sort out the rest of humanity, then that is not just arrogance – it is the moral collapse of a civilization.
Davos, Bilderberg & Co.: the “salvation” of the world – without the world
Whether it’s at the WEF, Bilderberg, or Silicon Valley, you hear the same message everywhere: “We know what’s good for you.”
But who are “we”?
No elected representatives, but managers, financial jugglers, AI prophets and advisors cheering each other on in closed conferences.
Their goal is no longer to make the world more just, but to manage it more efficiently .
That sounds innocent, but in practice it means:
- less democratic control,
- more technological surveillance,
- more privileges for those who have access to the digital tools.
The Real Ark: Responsibility Instead of Escape
The idea of a “technological Noah’s ark” may sound romantic to the elites, but for the rest of humanity it’s a slap in the face.
Because while billionaires are thinking about flight plans and space colonies, billions of people are struggling to survive every day.
The future must not be the private property of a Davos clique.
If Harari and his WEF friends really want to “save” humanity, they need to start taking responsibility – instead of building a digital fortress.
Because any civilization that gives up its majority to save its elite has already perished – it just hasn’t realized it yet.