Emily Jean Whiteford: A Case Study in Unspeakable Vulgarity and Crassness
A Viral Video Offers an Ugly Glimpse into the Current State of White Women.
As many readers may have seen, the antics of a female student at University of Pittsburgh have caused quite a stir on Twitter and YouTube. The controversy surrounds a video published by the anti-abortion channel “Abolitionists Rising,” which was then discussed by another Twitter account. The reason for the controversy is that the video appears to feature one Emily Jean Whiteford. She incidentally is the same woman whose interaction with the late Charlie Kirk became famous (or infamous) as she purposefully flashed a nipple to try and get the Turning Point USA YouTube channel infracted for indecency. Because of the woman’s significant weight gain, there have been challenges to the claim this is the same woman. Whiteford is shown having a different, smaller tattoo on her midriff. The woman from the recent video has a much larger tattoo at more or less the same part of her body. Some angles suggest this tattoo is in a different spot on her midriff, but, given that this tattoo coverup was spotted in an earlier photo of Whiteford when she was thinner, it seems all but confirmed that the plumper woman is the same.
Much of the controversy stems from what the woman said about Kirk, gloating over his death. Her exact words read as follows:
Are you a fan of Charlie Kirk? Why don’t you dig him up and fuck him in the neck hole?
These sorts of comments and this sort of behavior is offensive but hardly surprising. Large segments of the left in the United States have expressed similar views. In passing, it should be noted that the demonstrative grandstanding about forgiveness most particularly from Erika Kirk but others as well sapped all momentum from the outrage and backlash stemming from Kirk’s assassination. The failure to crackdown on Antifa and other hard left elements may ultimately prove dispositive in determining which side ultimately wins and which side loses. Beyond these somewhat obvious considerations, there is much more at play here besides a leftist college woman gloating over the death of a political adversary or ideological enemy. Stated bluntly, those opposed to the left must embrace a similar callousness to our political enemies soon, before it is too late.
Above and beyond such commentary is what this moment reveals about the current state of womanhood in modern society, namely how sexually crass and truly vulgar supposed liberated women have become. This tendency is evinced in the sentence “Why don’t you dig him up and fuck him in the neck hole?” However, overlooked by much of the outrage from mainstream conservatives and perhaps the real, reactionary right is how obscene almost every utterance out of her mouth really is.
Unfortunately, the video is edited: perhaps unedited footage will be published (or discovered by this author). In the footage that has been made available, after T. Russell Hunter asserts that “no, miscarriage is not murder” in response to an inane, idiotic “argument” for abortion, the woman blurts out this non-sequitur:
“Have you ever made a woman cum? Have you ever made a woman cum? Have you ever made a woman cum?
His response was “yes I have.” She responded with this retort:
Oh, really? Was she lying? Cuz you can’t really tell.
Her cadence strangely drifted into what sounds like a fake Irish accent for just a second. The exchange was then followed up by her assertion that “Every time you jerk off, you’re killing your babies.” In fairness to Whiteford, this was on the heels of a blackie who asserted that if abortion is murder, “than you should not be able to ejaculate or nothing.” Hunter offered the obvious rebuttal offering a remedial restatement of concepts that should be understood by anyone who completed 5th grade sex education:
That’s so… that’s dumb. So, that’s dumb because sperm. . ..You think a sperm without an egg can make a human? Then you just answered yourself. So, obviously sperm are not humans. Human beings. . ..I hate to have to be the one to do this. . . human beings are created via sexual reproduction. The sperm has to meet the egg to produce a newly conceived human being.
Aside from the especially poor reasoning made all the more shocking that these are supposed to be collegiate women, this moment again underscores a shocking sexual crassness that pervades much of the Zeitgeist but significant portions of young white women as well.
While there are some particularly odious male specimens from the likes of Reddit who may engage in such antics, such propensities seem most pronounced in a certain sort of “liberated” young woman. To demonstrate how absurd and repugnant such conduct really is, imagine what a male counterpart might sound like. Imagine a woman advocating a particular policy position, and a man blurting out shocking sexual vulgarity if not obscenity as a supposed retort in response:
“Oh yeah, can you make a man cum? Can you suck his dick until he spurts down your throat?”
Similarly, a man who makes any reference to a woman’s masturbatory habits might get the police called on him, and not without good reason.
Whiteford’s interaction is notable in other ways, including the lewd manner in which she sticks her tongue out at Hunter, the crowd, and the viewing audience. Once again, outside of instances like Chaim Witz—aka Gene Simmons of KISS—or fellow yid David Lee Roth in a music video from decades past, such a gesture would be looked upon far less favorably if done by men. Her manner of speaking as well as poor reasoning also condemns and indicts the current state of education, referring to Hunter as “bro” and “my boy.” Aside from a shocking disrespect for one’s elders, it is confounding that supposed college educated men and women speak, write, and think this way.
This case study is part of a greater pastiche of sexual crassness exhibited by a critical mass of young women. These are not just isolated incidents, but an observable sociological trend that is occurring at scale. Both online and real life, more and more women are proving more and more likely to respond to any sort of disagreement or criticism with conjecture about penis size, along with the off-the-shelf, mindless exhortation that someone is an “incel.” Often this is done without knowing anything about the man, and with no reason to conjecture about a man’s endowment (or lack thereof).
Once again, imagine if men were to act the same way. Imagine a man responding to a disagreement with a woman—any sort of disagreement, right or wrong, reasonable or unreasonable—by blurting out conjecture that she has a loose vagina, or that her vagina smells bad, or that no sane man would either “lick or stick it.” While such hypothetical behavior is more outrageous precisely because it is uttered by a man to a woman,1 in the same way that indecent exposure IS different for men than it is for women, it should nonetheless be no less acceptable from a woman. And yet this is the sort of crude, crass, even obscene behavior that has been encouraged by the cultural milieu that envelops society of late.
The curious case of Emily Jean Whiteford reveals other social maladies as well. Many have (rightly) commented on her significant weight gain. Because of this weight gain, there were more than a few challenges as to whether this is indeed the same woman. This was bolstered by a different complexion (olive skinned in 2024, fair skinned and pimply in 2026), as well as a different cadence and really different manner of speaking and interacting with the person making a public appearance on university grounds for a video on social media. The weight gain is particularly astonishing insofar as this woman is still in her early 20s—not middle-aged when metabolism slows, differences in bone and joint health make rigorous fitness routines more difficult, so on and so forth. She looks like she gained fifty pounds, on a less than statuesque, tall frame. Part of that may be bloating from a menstrual cycle, but only part. This too, not unlike the guttermouth that would make sailors in years past blush, is properly attributed to sociological factors observed at a cultural, sociological level. SSRIs are known to cause weight gain. Beyond that, the American diet is appalling, in no small part because the FDA is so ineffectual, coupled with the free rein given to corporate interests to not only peddle whatever they choose as supposed food products, but to freely advertise under the false pretense of “free speech.”
In relation to her astonishing weight gain, there is a further irony. Even though there is a pronounced asymmetry in terms of opportunities afforded to men and women for promiscuous and even ultra-promiscuous sexual behavior, perhaps a woman in her state should not be so keen on attacking another’s perceived sexual desirability (or lack thereof). Whereas Hunter is handsome, and whereas he looks healthy, stout, and masculine, (not to mention happily married), Whiteford not only gained a ton of weight, but also looks sickly. Others have also commented on her acne. Such crass and seemingly cruel insults directed at women are perhaps distasteful, but, absent other measures effective in deterring such behavior, perhaps such personal attacks are necessary until some minimal decorum has been reestablished in society. Aside from offending even baseline sensibilities for basic decorum and courtesy, such a “gonzo” strategy begets other problems. Notable among such problems is the unpleasant, hard truth that, alas, a number of women who have succumbed to such unspeakable ugliness and vulgarity are, unlike Whiteford, very attractive.
The antics of Emily Jean Whiteford are just the latest paint stroke in what has become a most vulgar picture. Outrage at her gloating over Charlie Kirk’s death is not entirely misplaced, but the real outrage is the obscene and vulgar manner of speaking that characterizes her entire appearance on this video. So much of it is all too familiar as a sort of “script” that has become all too characteristic for so many young women and older alike. That so few have commented on this particular dynamic of this spectacle demonstrates how deviancy has in fact been defined ever further down, so much so that it strikes many as banal or commonplace. That it has become so banal and commonplace, that so many have been rendered numb to such offensive and objectively shocking behavior should at long last sound the proverbial alarms as to the true state of culture and modern society.
https://theravenscall.substack.com/p/emily-jean-whitford-a-case-study