Hostile Acts
I had the pleasure of meeting Peter Schweizer a few months ago while filming Seamus Bruner for our documentary Deconstruction: The Global Fight for Freedom. We traded signed books and had a short chat. I was familiar with a lot of his work and was surprised to find him shooting baskets as I went out to get something from the car for the shoot. For a guy with numerous #1 New York Times Bestsellers, he’s pretty down to earth.
The deeper one goes into the research being done at the Government Accountability Institute, the worse it gets. Schweizer recently published a book called The Invisible Coup (2025), that’s a serious wake-up call to the subversive nature of Mexican culture in America (H/T Concerned American). When one realizes that the insistence on speaking Spanish, the refusal to become citizens and a refusal to adapt to US rules, regulations and laws is a form of national repudiation of the United States their motives reveal themselves as hostile. Not all Mexicans engage in this, but it is the primary purpose of the caravans to destabilize and work at the seams of American culture.
They aren’t just sending Spanish text books into the school system to help those struggling with English to keep up with the class, but a means of replacing US history with the Mexican version of events. This is how they keep up the ruse that the US stole Mexican land. The truth is, we had Mexican land and could have kept it, instead of just taking the part we wanted. Texas was an independent nation when the US annexed it, so that wasn’t even Mexico at the time. Texas acquired it from Mexico by the one of the traditional means.
I’ve lived in the South, Southwest and West almost all of my life. Two of my friends in first grade were Mexican (1960s). No one ever thought much about it, because this is a free country. We have a lot of different races here, a lot of different languages and accents. One of the consequences of freedom and wealth is that it draws people from all over the globe who want to make their hard work mean something. It’s a chance to grow and provide for the family in ways they never could at home. Most Americans don’t see anything wrong with that, per se, until it becomes a hostile act. If they’re going to continue to fight the war after their defeat in 1848, I guess we’re all going to have to fight it, too.
That’s what mass migration is: a hostile act. That’s what the caravans from Obama on through Biden were all about. The caravans serve two purposes: 1) it allows for the ability to tamper with the election system in almost every way possible; 2) it allows for the continued pursuit of the goal of reconquering the Southern tier of states that border Mexico.
Proponents of the “reconquista” cleverly use the word “American” to mean anyone in North, South and Central America. It’s a ruse that allows them to claim that ICE is arresting “Americans” making it sound like an abuse against American citizens. But none of those nations have “America” in the title, so it’s a technical lie. For instance, that’s not how they refer to themselves in their own countries.
This is what Schweizer’s book highlights, the myriad of ways Mexico is invading, setting up isolated communities, refusing to assimilate, spreading their language and culture throughout the United States to one day reconquer it, if not officially, effectively. It’s the exact method used by Islamists: enter, isolate and consolidate. From that base they can swing elections toward their members who have become citizens as a means of becoming a titular head of a broadening cell of subversives.
In this way, our entire nation is under attack from Hispanics and Muslims, who are fighting over the carcass of a nation caught in the grips of treasonous politicians who only see these groups as voters, whether legal or illegal. Hispanic leaders run for elected office as the Muslims do. They can swing votes in Congress toward the favor of Mexico while they vote on other issues that will keep their constituents happy. The line of treason is nonetheless being traversed.
In time, the American culture will disappear unless we adopt their attitudes toward them that they have fostered towards us.
Stolen land.
The Hispanics are in the process of stealing land, literally engaged in the act, like cat burglars. Remember the Marxist ploy of accusing your enemy of doing that which you are in fact doing. That’s where “stolen land” comes from, it’s a cynical tactic and should be recognized as such. This is what is at stake in Minnesota. Will the US be denied proper defense of its land or turn it over to the invaders?
Throughout the history of the world, there are only a couple of ways to acquire land: 1) war and occupation; 2) purchase, like the Louisiana Purchase and the purchase of Alaska; 3) through a trade of one possession to another power to quell a dispute, or to satisfy a treaty; 4) enter, isolate and consolidate; 5) discover and settle.
Until very recently the concept of “reconquista” was a joke, a ribbing whenever there were a disproportionate amount of Hispanics in a group. At least, it could be seen as an aggressive teasing. To whatever degree one considered it such, it had no affect, but our own government is behind this effort to hand it over to them, to deliver it. Not a day goes by that our representatives and senators do not act in a treasonous fashion. No election will change that. They take comfort in the fact that Americans, of all races, are being replaced by other races, because they care about the raw numbers, not who those numbers represent.
The blame is not with those who attack a weak and ineffective land, it lies solely with those who allowed it to become weak and ineffective. Knowing this, it’s impossible to look on these representatives and senators as anything other than a domestic enemy, even those who enjoy support from Republican voters, perhaps especially them.
There’s a rift coming, a recognition that the people have long been sold out and while almost everyone who gives any thought to it, at all, must come away with that conclusion, it does not prescribe a solution. The only answer to it is to stand solid on the foundation that as an American, we have every right to be proud of our nation, to demand fidelity from our representatives in government and to punish those who violate our laws. Why does that seem so fanciful? Why is that not the default?