How the Conspirators Destroy Society
The conspirators are pushing society toward the Great Reset by sowing division, mistrust, and fear between men and women through gender controversies, transgender politics, and exaggerated campaigns against sexual abuse.
They also sow divisions by fueling accusations of racism, banning national history and culture, and pushing for affirmative action and affirmative action, writes Rhoda Wilson .
The ultimate goal of the conspirators, says Dr. Vernon Coleman, is to disrupt society and create a New World Order, with the Great Reset as the end goal.
The conspirators (and denying their existence is like denying the existence of water) are relentlessly pushing us toward the Great Reset. One of the ways they do this is by destroying a (relatively) civilized society that has taken centuries to develop.
They have ruined our lives with gender controversies (with insane changes to gender language introduced solely to sow confusion and destroy human relationships), with transgender politics (also designed to sow confusion and divide), and with overblown campaigns against sexual assault (“He said my hair looked nice and he liked my dress, and now my life is ruined.”) A man whistling at a woman to compliment her appearance or show his admiration was once considered a compliment by most women, but today it is a criminal offense.
The conspirators have deliberately created division, mistrust, and fear between the sexes, and the neoliberals who run the global economic system have consistently shown that their goal is not to create greater justice or advance women’s rights in countries where injustice is rife, but to sow as much division as possible between men and women.
The goal of the neoliberals who are part of the establishment and pushing us toward their beloved Great Reset is to tear society apart in as many ways as possible, so that men and women are too busy fighting each other to worry about progress toward the New World Order.
For precisely the same reason, national history and national and regional culture are being banished from all aspects of life, and schools and colleges are no longer teaching their students subjects that could be perceived as patriotic or that could in any way lead to greater pride.
Then there are the absurdly exaggerated accusations of racism, always popular with communists who see such accusations as a way to disrupt society, with accusations based on the flimsiest pretexts (“He couldn’t pronounce my name properly, so he’s a racist,” “He didn’t pick me for his team, so he must be a racist”). One celebrity had to issue a cringeworthy apology after people with too much free time discovered he’d once tweeted that he might need to learn another language while in London. Given that most people in London aren’t from England and speak little to no English, his remark was valid and logical. But it was wrongly perceived as racist because the person who saw it as racist had been encouraged to want to see it as racist.
Of course, attempts to prohibit racism themselves lead to racism, with affirmative action and affirmative action being nothing more than racism by color. Appointing a Black woman to a company’s board of directors simply because she is Black and a woman and helps the company meet its diversity quota is racist, sexist, and simply wrong. The Black woman should be appointed because she is the best candidate and will do the best work for employees, shareholders, and customers.
Advertisers who show photos of happy couples or families often feature a Black couple or a Black man and a white woman (usually a blonde). It’s unusual these days to see white men in print or television ads. This isn’t simply political correctness; it’s done so the advertiser can avoid accusations of racism. It’s virtue signaling and, of course, racist in itself. Some people who don’t have white skin won’t buy products advertised exclusively using white actors and models. I understand that. It’s about respect and the feeling of exclusion. We should be a multiracial society, but in their subservient service to the woke movement, advertisers sometimes seem to forget this. Attempts by impulsive politicians to dismiss concerns about this very real problem are as predictable as they are unrepresentative.
I read about an “initiative” in the UK called “Black Farmer’s New Face of Farming,” which offers a range of food products under the brand name “The Black Farmer.” In the US, there’s an organization called the Black Farmers’ Market. And there are several other organizations along these lines. For example, there’s the National Black Police Association, and in London, the Metropolitan Black Police Association. There’s a Black Writers Guild, a Black Writers Society, and a Black Writers’ Association. And there’s a Black Agents and Editors’ Group. I can’t help but think that by defining a group based on skin color, these undoubtedly well-meaning people are perpetuating and even creating racism. And I wonder what the reaction would be if a group of farmers formed an organization for white farmers. Or if a group of white police officers formed an association called the White Police Association? I can hardly avoid the suspicion that creating racial groups in this way is part of the conspirators’ plan to sow discord in society.
In the United Kingdom, it has been revealed that the RAF [Royal Air Force] discriminated against white men. “Discrimination,” of course, is just a polite word for “racism.” If a Black man is treated unfairly because of his skin color, that’s racism, and there’s an uproar, people get fired, and a scandal breaks out. If a white man is treated unfairly because of his skin color, that’s discrimination, and no one cares. There’s little doubt that if racism is a serious problem in the United Kingdom, it’s primarily white men and women who are the victims.
We see footballers and other athletes kneeling in an attempt to demonstrate their moral integrity, but in doing so, they only reveal how easily they can be manipulated. It seems to me that they are displaying superficial, fake compassion and their own tendency to virtue signal. Unfortunately, when it comes down to it, the athletes seem to have little moral courage. For example, during the World Cup in Qatar, male footballers bravely announced that they would wear rainbow armbands throughout the tournament to show their support for homosexuals. For unknown reasons, homosexuals have stolen the rainbow, long a Christian symbol, as their emblem. And homosexuality is illegal in Qatar. You would think that a better and more appropriate way to express their feelings would have been not to go to Qatar at all. However, when the organizers announced that footballers wearing rainbow armbands would be punished, the players lost their enthusiasm and put their rainbow armbands away.
The Bank of England (responsible for wrecking the British economy and failing to control inflation) has declared that people of any “gender identity” (I think they mean men or women, but who knows) can be treated as pregnant. And the Bank is having gender-neutral toilets built so that female and male bankers who are unsure of their gender identity can use the toilet together and share the experience in politically correct harmony.
The Bank’s insane pregnancy policy means that anyone can now be classified as a “biological parent” and claim family leave from the bank. I bet there are people with a 7% mortgage who wish the Bank would focus on inflation and worry a little more about the economy and a little less about showing how woke it is.
There are endless attacks on masculinity and femininity, with constant pressure to create unisex bathrooms and a unisex world. We can only watch as the family unit disappears and the state becomes central to our lives, as the corporate media (which now seems to specialize in misinformation and disinformation, rarely, if ever, reporting news without inherent judgment) is biased and dishonest, and as homosexuality and the rest of the specialties within the LGBTQIA community are on the rise. (I tried to figure out what the Q, I, and A stand for, but failed at this simple task. No one I spoke to knew the answer, and even the internet couldn’t provide an answer.)
It used to be considered polite for a man to compliment a colleague or friend (“Your hair looks nice,” “That dress suits you,” and so on) without anyone taking offense. If the compliment were sincere, the recipient would even be pleased and flattered. Today, such remarks are considered signs of extreme sexism, and men have been fired for saying such things and labeled sex offenders.
It’s now even considered sexist for a man to give up his seat on public transportation and offer a woman his right of way, or to give a woman the right of way when passing through a doorway. (Ironically, men can sometimes be accused of rudeness if they don’t.)
And of course, the promoters of professional women’s sports insist that women’s football and cricket teams receive equal attention to the more traditional men’s teams. Huge amounts of money are poured into women’s sports, even though it’s clear there’s little interest in women’s team matches or in individual female athletes (women have been playing professional tennis and golf for decades, but interest in their matches has always been minimal compared to the interest in the male versions of those sports). The media, as always, has remained passive, and some newspapers now devote more attention to women’s sports than to men’s, with the result that their readers find it almost impossible to navigate their pages. A casual reader might see a headline that screams “England Triumph at the World Cup” and stumble across an article about the success of a team of 14-year-old girls playing lacrosse or netball.
Here again there is a hidden agenda.
Promoting and encouraging sexism fuels conflict and confusion—two building blocks considered essential to pushing us toward the Great Reset. And new rules on “equality, diversity, and inclusion” have replaced humanity, goodwill, and kindness with legal obligations, legal wrangling, and legal recriminations. These rules on diversity, inclusion, and equality do far more harm than good.
The bottom line is that you can’t regulate kindness.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/hoe-de-samenzweerders-de-samenleving-vernietigen