MAID in Canada
The Rise of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) & Its Impact on White Canadians.
In Canada, euthanasia, euphemistically termed Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID), has become a legally sanctioned end-of-life option since its introduction in 2016. This program allows eligible individuals suffering from grievous medical conditions to request assistance from healthcare providers to end their own lives, either through “clinician-administered” drugs or self-administered prescriptions. While proponents hail it as a compassionate choice promoting autonomy and dignity, critics argue it raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding its disproportionate application among certain demographics. Notably, official data reveals that MAID predominantly results in the deaths of white Canadians.
The path to legalizing MAID began with a Supreme Court of Canada decision in 2015, Carter v. Canada, which struck down the absolute prohibition on assisted dying as unconstitutional under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The ruling argued that the ban violated individuals’ rights to life, liberty, and security of the person, especially for those enduring intolerable suffering. In response, Parliament passed Bill C-14 in June 2016, amending the Criminal Code to permit MAID under strict conditions.
Initially, eligibility was limited to adults whose natural death was “reasonably foreseeable,” with safeguards including two independent medical assessments, a 10-day reflection period, and informed consent.
The program expanded significantly in March 2021 with Bill C-7, following a Quebec Superior Court ruling in Truchon v. Attorney General of Canada that deemed the “reasonably foreseeable” criterion discriminatory.
This amendment introduced two tracks: Track 1 for those whose death is foreseeable (with streamlined safeguards) and Track 2 for others with irremediable conditions, requiring a 90-day assessment period and expertise in the patient’s condition.
Further expansions have been debated, including delays in extending MAID to those with mental illness as the sole underlying condition until 2027. This expansion into the mental health domain constitutes a marked expansion of MAID eligibility criteria. Presumably, people diagnosed with depression or anxiety will be eligible to end their own lives relatively soon.
MAID is administered by physicians or nurse practitioners, with two methods: direct administration (euthanasia) or provision of a self-administered substance (assisted suicide).
By 2024, MAID accounted for over 4% of all deaths in Canada, with numbers rising steadily from 1,015 in 2016 to 16,499 in 2024.
This growth reflects increasing public acceptance, but it also highlights MAID’s role in ending lives, particularly among white populations.
To access MAID, individuals must be at least 18, eligible for publicly funded healthcare, have a grievous and irremediable medical condition causing enduring suffering, make a voluntary request, and provide informed consent.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The Trial of Socrates here.
Conditions like cancer (the most common, at 64% in 2023), cardiovascular diseases, and neurological disorders dominate requests.
Unlike some jurisdictions, terminal illness is not required, broadening eligibility to include chronic disabilities. The process involves a written request, assessments by two practitioners, and procedural safeguards to prevent coercion.
However, concerns persist about vulnerabilities, such as poverty or inadequate support services influencing decisions. For instance, some cases have involved individuals citing housing instability or financial hardship as factors.
Since legalization, over 60,000 Canadians have died via MAID.
The Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (2024) from Health Canada details 16,499 provisions, a 7.5% increase from 2023.
This makes MAID the fifth leading cause of death in Canada, surpassing some traditional categories like accidents.
Demographic breakdowns reveal patterns: The median age is around 78, with slightly more men (50.8%) than women being killed.
Urban residents and those with higher education or income levels are overrepresented as well.
The most striking statistic is racial: in 2024, 95.6% of the 15,927 respondents identified as Caucasian (White), far exceeding the general population (Canada’s overall population is now approximately 70% white and falling).
This trend holds from prior years—95.8% in 2023 and consistently around 96% since the program began.
MAID’s role in causing the deaths of white people is evident in the data. With whites comprising 95-96% of recipients, the program effectively ends the lives of thousands of white Canadians annually—over 15,000 in 2024 alone.
This disproportion is not fully explained by demographics; while Canada’s older population is whiter (86% of those 65+ in 2021), MAID’s white recipient rate exceeds even age-adjusted expectations.
Some researchers note that whites may have better access to healthcare, leading to higher awareness and utilization of MAID.
Surveys show MAID supporters are often older, wealthier, educated, and white, correlating with higher approval rates.
The fact that whites are being euthanized at a higher rate than other groups is an indication of “white privilege.” According to the official narrative, as articulated by the government of Canada, non-whites or “racialized” groups such as Indigenous people (0.6-1% of recipients), and others facing “systemic barriers like racism or poverty” are examples of “underrepresentation.”
One analysis entitled “Euthanized While White” highlights that even accounting for age, the 96% figure indicates a “tilt towards the privileged group.”
Institutional deaths (hospitals, hospices) show similar patterns, with whites dominating subtotals across provinces. It is a privilege to be put to death, apparently.
This emphasis on white deaths raises questions about whether MAID inadvertently targets or is preferentially used against whites. High death rates amongst the white populace combined with increased population replacement immigration points to a wider genocidal scheme.
A notable video clip features Dr. Madeline Li, a psychiatrist and advocate for expanding MAID to mental illness cases, who is also a fellow of the Trudeau Foundation. In the footage, shared widely on social media, she states: “People getting MAID are actually very privileged. They’re white. They’re well off.”
This overt acknowledgment comes during a discussion on MAID’s demographics and expansion. The video, from a panel or interview context, explains the clip’s relevance: Li admits that MAID recipients are predominantly “privileged” white individuals, aligning with Health Canada data.
As a key figure in MAID advocacy and linked to government-affiliated bodies, her statement provides evidence of recognition at high levels that MAID is being used on white people with “privilege.” Critics interpret this as an implicit admission of the program’s focus, though Li frames it in the context of access disparities.
The clip has sparked controversy, with over 297,000 views and discussions on platforms like X, highlighting concerns about the programs true intent.
While MAID is praised in some circles for relieving suffering, its emphasis on causing white deaths has fueled debate. Some view it as a “slippery slope,” with expansions potentially targeting vulnerable whites further.
In official government sources, the ethical concerns that are emphasized are whether “white privilege” enables easier access to MAID, leading to more white deaths. Yes, the government of Canada believes it is a privilege to be put out of your own misery.
As Canada imports more non-white migrants while MAID grows, some quite rightly speculate about demographic engineering and anti-white population replacement.
MAID represents a profound departure from ethical, end-of-life care. With 95-96% of recipients being white, MAID epitomizes the anti-white, dysgenic, and genocidal nature of a modern multicultural state.