‘Racist’ – A Word Coined by Leon Trotsky of the USSR
The word “racist” has long been the most effective fear monger in the left’s and neoconservatives’ arsenal. For decades, they’ve used it successfully in the political arena to smear traditionalists, stifle debate, and route opponents. In the social arena, they’ve done even more damage by using it to brainwash impressionable children and young students , teaching people to hate their country, their cultural traditions, and, worst of all, themselves.
What’s surprisingly not discussed at all, even by the hard core of the traditional right-wing movement, is the word’s origins. Did it originate with a liberal sociologist? A Marxist university professor from the 1960s? Perhaps a Democratic Party politician? No. It turns out the word was coined by none other than one of the chief architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky, writes Dustin Stanley .
Please take a look at this document , dear reader.
стсталости, строило свою философию на том, что русский with демократичны, а официя Петром. Маркс заметил по этому поводу: “Just as the Teutonic donkeys blame the despotism of Frederick II etc. on the French, as if slaves left behind did not always need civilized slaves to receive the necessary education.” This short remark fully summarizes not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the “racists”.
This is Leon Trotsky’s 1930 work, “The History of the Russian Revolution,” from which the above excerpt is taken. The last word in that excerpt is “расистов,” whose Latin transliteration is ‘racistov,’ i.e., “racists.” This work is the first time in history that this word appears.
My more doubtful readers can consult the internet, the microfiches and microfilms at their local library, as well as the numerous books on their shelves, but they will never find an earlier use of the word “racist” than Trotsky’s word-creation here.
The next logical question, then, is: what was Leon Trotsky’s purpose in coining this word? To find out, let’s look at a complete English translation of the paragraph we looked at earlier.
Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, based its philosophy on the assumption that the Russian people and their church were thoroughly democratic, while official Russia was a German bureaucracy imposed on them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked on this: “In the same way, the Germanic idiots blamed the French for the despotism of Frederick II, as if backward slaves didn’t always need civilized slaves to educate them.” This brief remark not only puts an end to the old philosophy of the Slavophiles but also to the latest revelations of the ‘racists.’”
The Slavophiles Trotsky referred to were historically a group of traditionalist Slavs who deeply valued their native culture and way of life and wanted to protect it. Trotsky, on the other hand, saw them and others like them as an obstacle to his internationalist communist plans for the world. This man didn’t care a whit for the Slavic Russians he supposedly served. To him, Slavophiles—that is, Slavs who committed the “crime” of loving their own people and protecting their traditional way of life—were simply “backward,” and others like them were simply “racists.”
The reality behind the word’s origins is indeed far removed from the left-liberal version of the story: that the word was coined in good faith to designate people who were simply intolerant of certain racial groups, and as a rallying cry for good liberals to protect racial minorities from the intolerant. On the contrary, the real concept behind the word (even if he hadn’t quite conceived it yet) – that ethnocentric “backwardness” must be subordinate to “enlightened” internationalism – was frequently used by Army and Navy Commissar Trotsky as a rallying cry for good Red Army communists to commit murderous acts of violence against peoples who resisted the disappearance of their traditional way of life and its replacement by an alien system . [1]
Fast forward to today, 2010, and the only changes in the word and its underlying concept since 1930 (aside from the fact that Marxists have perfected the art of achieving the same thing with less bloodshed but no less misery) are that the targets of the word have expanded from just Slavs unwilling to submit to the Marxist internationalist plan to uproot and destroy their culture and traditional way of life, to all whites, Slavic or otherwise, unwilling to submit to that same despicable Marxist plan. Likewise, those wielding the word have expanded from a handful of communists to the entire liberal and neoconservative establishment in countries around the world.
Leon Trotsky, who had helped Lenin build the Soviet killing machine with which he and Trotsky murdered 1-4 million[2] people, was ousted from power and exiled from the Soviet Union in 1929 after losing a power struggle to become Lenin’s successor to Josef Stalin. Before fading into obscurity, however, Leon Trotsky would do one last thing in 1930 that would likely do more damage to the West than the entire Soviet nuclear arsenal of Stalin and his successors ever could. He would coin a word that would literally empower the most rotten, treacherous weasels within the West to redefine those loyal to their people, their cultural traditions, and their way of life as the ultimate evil, and send the government, the educational system, and the mass media on an absolute crusade of tyranny until they and virtually everyone around them actually believed it. And this unholy creation would be repeated over and over again, supported by a revisionist history fabricated by more of the same rotten weasels who falsely portrayed the white man as the sole perpetrator of slavery and genocide in the world , and this would continue until the West, through demoralization, would submit to the entire Trotskyist internationalist agenda without a single shot being fired. We can see the final stages of this now, with racial double standards being created here in America (at the expense of American whites, of course), with the introduction of “racism” and “hate speech” as criminal offenses in Europe (targeting only the indigenous population, of course), with the Canadian and Australian governments adopting “multiculturalism” as official government policy (at the expense of existing Canadian and Australian cultures), and above all, with the massive wave of Third World immigration into the West, supported by all Western governments (otherwise it wouldn’t be happening), which is radically changing the composition and culture of those countries and threatening to turn their native populations into minorities within a few decades.
Thanks largely to Trotsky’s role in the murder of millions under Lenin’s regime, and the ongoing global recession , which has led many doubters to take a stand on these issues, right-wing politicians have a real opportunity to put an end to this term once and for all, simply by telling the truth about who coined it and what its purpose was (and is). It’s an opportunity we shouldn’t miss. It’s hard to imagine a genuine Euro-nationalist movement whose members, most of whom consider themselves “racists” for daring to embark on such a project, as the current ruling system would have us believe.
Comments:
[1] There is a shocking lack of good material on the internet about the additional tragedy of the suppression of regional sovereignty and self-determination movements after the fall of the Tsar in Russia by Trotsky’s Red Army. One of the best things you can find on the internet about this is the interview with Nina Turmarkin, which I linked last in the paragraph marked by this footnote, and which can be found here:
(http://www.pbs.org/heavenonearth/interviews_tumarkin.html). Ms. Turmarkin discusses the optimism that prevailed after the February Revolution that overthrew the Tsar, about villages declaring independence from the regime and sewing their own flags, and so on. She doesn’t say what happened to those villages and such, but if you know history, you know that they were forced back into line, and into an even worse line than the Tsar’s, under the bayonets of the Red Army, commanded by Trotsky. Those who refused to return to that worse line were, of course, killed. In any case, I strongly recommend that interested readers on this topic read books for more information, because unfortunately, what’s available online is of very poor quality.
[2] The highest estimate of state murders (4 million) under the Lenin/Trotsky regime is that of political scientist R.J. Rummel in his book, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917, available at: (http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE4.HTM). I myself was taught a lower estimate of 1-2 million in school. The major factors in the deaths were executions of dissidents, brutal suppression of the self-determination movements that arose after the fall of the Tsar and in response to the early Soviet police state, and the Russian famine of 1921. The new Soviet government was certainly responsible for the first two. They were at least somewhat responsible for the third, but precisely how responsible is a matter of debate beyond the scope of this article. Either way, whether it’s 1-2 million, 4 million, or somewhere in between, what happened under that regime is absolutely horrific.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/racistisch-een-woord-bedacht-door-leon-trotski-uit-de-ussr