Rulers and Rape-Gangs
Where was the Queen then? Where is the King now? And where has the Church been throughout? Nowhere, that’s where. Neither the individuals nor the institution have spoken a word in condemnation of Britain’s burgeoning non-White rape-gangs or in defence of the White victims. And neither the individuals nor the institution can possibly say: “We didn’t know.”
Raped by Pakistani Muslims, betrayed by Labour’s elite: a White working-class girl in Groomed: A National Scandal (video extracts here)
By 2020, the whole country knew. The rape-gangs had been exposed repeatedly in the national media and no-one could deny knowledge. But Britain’s rulers are plainly on the side of the rapists, not of the raped. Elizabeth the Evil, Chuck the Cuck[1] and the Church of Mudzone have made that plain by their silence. Our current Labour rulers have made it plain by their sneers. The sneers in question came in response to Groomed: A National Scandal, a harrowing documentary about the rape-gangs broadcast on national television in April 2025. Lucy Powell, an elite Labour apparatchik, was asked during a radio debate whether she had seen the documentary. She immediately responded: “Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we? Yeah, OK, let’s get that dog-whistle out.” By “dog-whistle” she meant “disguised appeal to racists.” And it’s clear that Powell, who is no less than the Leader of the House of Commons, was speaking for the entire Labour elite. She and her fiercely feminist comrades all believe that it’s wrong and racist to mention the organized rape of tens or even hundreds of thousands of White working-class girls by Pakistani Muslim rape-gangs in Labour-controlled towns and cities all over Britain.
How to identify crimethink
And it’s precisely because her sneer was clear that she had to pretend the opposite. She issued an insincere and evasive apology the next day, saying: “In the heat of a discussion on AQ [Any Questions, the radio debate], I would like to clarify that I regard issues of child exploitation and grooming with the utmost seriousness. I’m sorry if this was unclear. I was challenging the political point-scoring around it, not the issue itself. As a constituency MP, I’ve dealt with horrendous cases. This government is acting to get to the truth and deliver justice.”
In fact, as I explained in “Carry on Raping,” the Labour government is acting to conceal the truth and destroy justice. And by “political point-scoring” Powell meant “any reference to the rape-gangs by a thought-criminal.” And how do we know someone is a thought-criminal? That’s easy to answer. If you refer to the rape-gangs, you’re a thought-criminal and it is therefore wrong and racist of you to refer to the rape-gangs. Catch-22, crime-thinker!
Lucy Powell, grinning defender of non-White rape-gangs
That is the official but unspoken attitude of the Labour party. At least, it was supposed to be unspoken. But Lucy Powell allowed the mask to slip. The Labour party, founded to champion the White working-class, are now dedicated and remorseless enemies of the White working-class. Like the Queen, the King and the Church of England, the Labour elite are on the side of the non-White rapists, not the White girls who have been raped. And are still being raped. As even the Guardian admits, Groomed has made it plain that the pathology continues to burgeon across the Jew-Blighted Kingdom.
Heretics against leftist orthodoxy
But Groomed also made something else plain: that not all leftists are collaborating with or trying to conceal the rape-gangs. The documentary was made by a leftist called Anna Hall, who first began work on this topic nearly thirty years ago. The documentary was broadcast by Channel 4, a thoroughly leftist station. Julie Bindel, a part-Jewish leftist lesbian journalist, began exposing the rape-gangs in the 1980s. So did the leftist politician Ann Cryer, Labour MP for the Yorkshire constituency of Keighley. The leftist social worker Jayne Senior and the leftist politician Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, followed Cryer’s lead in the twenty-first century. Like Cryer, Bindel and Hall before them, they were denounced as “racists” and “Islamophobes.”
All these women have moral courage. That’s why they become dissidents, heretics against leftist orthodoxy—and unrepresentative of leftism as a whole. So yes, not all leftists are collaborating with the rape-gangs, but the leftist elite certainly is. Leftism as a movement has been responsible for importing and incubating this non-White evil. And the rape-gangs are only part of that evil. Importing men from the rape-friendly Third World has certainly caused huge harm and suffering to young White women. But it has also caused huge harm and suffering to elderly White women. You can be certain that these horrors described in Sweden have been taking place all over the enriched West:
This satire by Nick Bougas accurately reflects Sweden’s leftist reality
Sweden’s elder rape scandal
The sexual abuse of elderly women by migrant carers was shamefully ignored
In autumn last year, Sweden was shaken by a scandal that shares some disturbing similarities with the grooming-gangs scandal in Britain. It is on a far smaller scale. But in Sweden, as in Britain, it seems that many vulnerable individuals have been raped and sexually abused, while the people whose job it should have been to protect them failed to do so. What’s more, those in positions of authority sometimes downplayed or hushed up allegations because of their low view of the victims and, potentially, the identity of some of the perpetrators.
The big difference between what happened in the UK and what happened in Sweden is that the victims were not young girls. They were elderly ladies dependent on outside carers to look after them. They claim that some of these carers brutally exploited their position of trust.
The scandal broke properly in early September last year, when 84-year-old Elsa (using the pseudonym, ‘Vera’) decided to speak out in an interview with the regional daily newspaper, Upsala Nya Tidning (UNT). [She had been raped by her non-White “carer,” whom leftist officials continued to send to her home despite her repeated complaints about his disturbing behavior.] When UNT interviewed Elsa last September, she used the pseudonym, ‘Vera’, because she was so frightened of what people would think of her. But her courage proved to be a wake-up call for Uppsala and, in many ways, for Sweden as a whole. Within days, more elderly ladies started to come forward to allege that they, too, had been abused by their carers. In particular, there was Siv, also from Uppsala. She told reporters how she was regularly raped by three different carers ‘from the same [non-White] country’. One of these men was the man who raped Elsa. They didn’t just visit her when they were supposed to work, but started to turn up in the evenings, too. This went on for months. Siv says she was in shock and was fearful of saying anything to anyone — that is, until Elsa gave her interview. Soon, other media started to cover the story. And the government-backed Swedish Gender Equality Agency began compiling a report on the violent abuse of the elderly.
The abuse clearly went beyond just a few cases. UNT contacted Sweden’s Health and Social Care Inspectorate (IVO) and demanded to see all reports of elder sexual abuse in the Swedish care system over the past five years. It turned out that councils across Sweden had received a staggering 45 reports. Some of these reports involved more than one perpetrator abusing a single victim. Others involved several victims reporting a single perpetrator. […] In 2024, television channel TV4 interviewed an 80-year-old lady called Ylva. Sitting in a wheelchair, Ylva said that she was raped twice in 2023 by her carer. When she spoke to her home-care management, they told her to keep quiet and not say a word to anyone. She did as she was told. It was only when she saw the UNT article about Elsa a year later that she plucked up the courage to speak about it. ‘Elsa is a hero’, she said. The manager of Ylva’s home-care service continues to avoid all questions from journalists.
The cases of elder abuse just keep coming. On 13 January this year, Baasim Yusuf, a 28-year-old of Somali origin, was sentenced by an Uppsala court to eight years in prison for two cases of rape and three cases of sexual assault, all of which he filmed. Some of his victims, suffering from poor memory, did not recall what had happened to them until the police showed them the video recordings. The public anger after Elsa spoke out, unleashing a torrent of horrific allegations, has been palpable. It has been matched only by the determination of the authorities to suppress the scandal. (“Sweden’s elder rape scandal,” Spiked Online, 27th April 2025)
Easton Grant and Emmanuel Adeniji, Black gerontophile rapists imported by leftists
England has had a prolific gerontophile rapist called Delroy Easton Grant, who is a Jamaican Black. Ireland has had prolific gerontophile rapist called Emmanuel Adeniji, who is a Nigerian Black. Importing Third-World people means incubating Third-World pathologies and inflicting horror on White women of all ages. Throughout Britain’s importing, incubation, and infliction, the monarchy and the Church of England have stayed silent. That is a gross betrayal and proof that we have traitors at the top. Meanwhile, another gross betrayal took place lower in the social scale, in an institution not traditionally regarded as leftist, namely, Britain’s police. The Groomed documentary is replete with examples of how one vital virtue appears to be entirely lacking amongst the macho men of the British police, just as it appears to be entirely lacking amongst the macho men of Britain’s armed forces. It’s called moral courage and to my best knowledge no male police officer has displayed it in response to rape-gangs, just as no male soldier, sailor or airman has displayed it in response to the gayification of the military. Ordinary military men and police will readily face death and serious injury because that wins them social approval and the praise of their leaders. However, they will not openly oppose leftism because that would win them social disapproval and the condemnation of their leaders. That’s why moral courage is much rarer than physical courage.
Why have there been no strikes by ordinary British police in protest at the way their traitorous leaders have refused to allow them to enforce the law against non-White child-rapists? Yes, it’s illegal for the police to go on strike, but that is all the more reason for them to do it. Like the monarchy and the Church of England above them, the police have the power to expose evil and rally public opinion in a way that can’t be censored or denied. But like the monarchy and the Church of England, the police have never used that power. Imagine the effect of a speech by the Queen in the 1960s or ’70s in which she had denounced the invasion of her White Christian realm by violent and unproductive non-Whites from corrupt and crime-ridden Third-World cultures. And imagine the effect of strikes by the police in the same era in which they denounced the organized and officially condoned rape that was already apparent in towns and cities all over the country.
How to end Third-World pathologies
But the Queen never made such a speech and the police have never gone on such strikes. The Queen was a traitor and the police lacked moral courage. The male ones, at least. And almost all the female ones too. Maggie Oliver was an honorable exception. She was a policewoman in Manchester, but wasn’t prepared to join the rest of the force in its implicit policy of “Carry On Raping.” Manchester is one of the big cities that I’ve described as “Much Worse Than Rotherham.” Bad as the rape-gangs in Rotherham have been, their crimes have been reproduced on a much bigger scale in cities like Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds and Bradford. More and more Whites are recognizing that. They’re also recognizing the complicity and collaboration of Britain’s leftist elite.
A true Queen and a true traitor: Elizabeth I (1533-1604) and Elizabeth II (1926-2022)
But most importantly, more and more Whites are recognizing that there is only one solution to the Third-World pathologies caused by Third-World people. The pathologies will expire only when the people are expelled. I gave Elizabeth the Evil that nickname because she wasn’t a true Christian and wasn’t a true queen. If she had been, she would have followed the example of her genuinely illustrious namesake from the sixteenth century. This is the true queen Elizabeth I ordering the expulsion of “divers Blackmoores” from her realm:
An open lettre to the Lord Maiour of London and th’alermen his brethren, And to all other Maiours, Sheryfes, &c. Her Majestie understanding that there are of late divers Blackmoores brought into the Realme, of which kinde of people there are all ready here to manie, consideringe howe God hath blessed this land w[i]th great increase of people of our owne Nation as anie Countrie in the world, wherof manie for want of Service and meanes to sett them on worck fall to Idlenesse and to great extremytie; Her Majesty’s pleasure therefore ys, that those kinde of people should be sent forthe of the lande. And for that purpose there ys direction given to this bearer Edwarde Banes to take of those Blackmoores that in this last voyage under Sir Thomas Baskervile, were brought into this Realme to the nomber of Tenn, to be Transported by him out of the Realme. Wherein wee Require you to be aydinge & Assysting unto him as he shall have occacion, and thereof not to faile. (See “Open letter by Elizabeth I” at the National Archive)[2]
What Elizabeth I ordered in the sixteenth century can be achieved in the twenty-first. Non-Whites have to return where they belong. After that, we need to put the traitors on trial and ensure that Britain’s future leaders never forget that they either serve the true British or suffer the painful consequences of betraying the true British. And the only true British are, of course, the White ones.
Notes
[1] Like his mother, Chuck the Cuck raises a fascinating question. Which is greater: his evil or his stupidity? The latter leapt to the fore in his recent claim that the Allied victory in World War 2 was a “result of unity between nations, races, religions and ideologies” and “remains a powerful reminder of what can be achieved when countries stand together in the face of tyranny.” The most important “ally” and “ideology” in the victory was, of course, the mass-murdering tyranny of Soviet Communism, which hated Chuck’s supposed religion of Christianity and had slaughtered Chuck’s relatives, the Russian royal family, in 1918.
[2] The Jewish historian Miranda Kaufmann has denied that “blackamoores” were expelled en masse from England. It’s part of her campaign to pretend that Blacks have long been an important part of British history, but there’s no doubt either that Elizabeth’s letter exists or that Blacks were a tiny and insignificant group in Elizabethan England.