The Erasure of Whiteness is Gaining Speed
As we have seen from the complicity of the British police in the murder of Henry Novak by an immigrant intruder, the decades-long propaganda that whites are racists has succeeded.
The oppression of whites by white governments is not limited to official indifference regarding their rape and murder. It applies across the board. For example, the British are no longer allowed to have historical figures on their money, and Americans are being robbed of their language through diversity, writes Paul Craig Roberts .
The Bank of England has decided that historical figures such as Winston Churchill are “elitist and polarizing” and is removing Churchill’s image from the 5-pound banknote.
The Bank of England’s decision to strip the famous British war leader is based on nothing more than a study by a market research firm named Savanna, which concluded that Churchill, Alan Turing—who cracked the Nazi Enigma code—and writer Jane Austen were “imperialist, potentially divisive, and elitist.” The news report does not mention the name of the idiot who ordered the “study,” nor is it explained why an 18th-century novelist whose work has been popular for centuries would be imperialist, polarizing, and elitist, or why a codebreaker would be, or why Churchill, who held his country together during a difficult war, would suddenly be polarizing.
The answer seems to be that they are white. The handful of woke idiots who reviewed the images on banknotes wanted “more inclusive” images on English money, and a handful of anti-white woke idiots made the decision to erase British history. In the “democracies” of the West, all decisions are imposed from above.
The market research firm concluded that British monuments and historic architecture, particularly buildings from the Georgian and Victorian eras, are too polarizing due to their ties to colonialism to appear on banknotes, just like the White Cliffs of Dover, an image that could suggest racist resistance to immigrant invaders. It is taken for granted that the only reason to oppose the immigration invasion is racism.
Once again, we see how multiculturalism destroys nations and their history.
Multicultural countries lack the unity that patriotism requires. Who will fight for a country without identity? Americans are even being robbed of their language. For many years, every American calling a bank, utility company, service provider, or anyone else has had to listen to automated voices answering in Spanish and English. I have noted the large number of languages that government agencies, such as Social Security and Medicare, boast they can communicate in. And now, banks with accounts in New York City have had to inform their New York City account holders, in accordance with New York City regulations, to notify the banks of their “language preference” for their account information—another step forward for “diversity,” which means division. White American families have disappeared from corporate advertisements. Black men are with white women; white men are with Asian or Hispanic women. The children are what used to be called half-breeds. Nowadays, the term is considered a racist slur, implying that there is something wrong with being a half-breed. If that is the case, why is a euphemism for the term less offensive?
What is a country without its own language, its own history, shared values and morals, and racial unity? The answer is that it is not a country. It is a Tower of Babel. How much longer will it be before historic buildings in Great Britain and Europe have to be torn down because of their association with whiteness? If statues, Shakespeare, and Jane Austen can be thrown in the trash, then all artifacts of Western civilization can too.
There is plenty of room for diversity in the world, but not within a country. Diversity within a country destroys the country. We are witnessing and experiencing the destruction of every Western country. We witness it and stand powerless to stop it.
https://www.frontnieuws.com/de-uitwissing-van-blankheid-wint-aan-snelheid/