The Gendered Attack: How Military Toxins Disproportionately Destroyed Women’s Biology
Ninety percent of adverse events from Pfizer’s injectable COVID-19 products occurred in women. This devastating statistic, meticulously documented in The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly , represents one of the most significant medical attacks on female biology in human history. The book’s extensive analysis of internal Pfizer documents—made public only through legal action—reveals catastrophic reproductive damage, with 23% of fetuses or newborns of vaccinated mothers dying, 129,988 cases of menstrual irregularities, and breast milk turning blue-green.
While The Pfizer Papers offers invaluable documentation of the damage, it unquestioningly accepts the fundamental premise that these injections work through mRNA instructions that create spike proteins. This acceptance, however well-intentioned, inadvertently provides cover for an even more sinister reality. The spike protein narrative—embraced by vaccine proponents and opponents alike—may be the most elegant scientific hoax ever devised, a masterpiece of deception that allows everyone to discuss proteins that never existed while the actual poisoning proceeds unnoticed, writes Unbekoming .
Nobel nominee Stefano Scoglio has demonstrated through meticulous analysis that the claimed mechanism of mRNA vaccines is biologically impossible. Living cells pose an insurmountable barrier to the myth that genetic instructions enter cells and produce proteins. Pfizer’s own Japanese biodistribution study confirmed this impossibility: lipid nanoparticles were recovered unchanged from organs, proving they never entered cells to deliver their payload. Meanwhile, using advanced spectrometry, researchers discovered 55 undeclared chemical elements in these injections—all 11 heavy metals, 12 of the 15 lanthanides—elements that have no vaccine purpose but clear applications in nanotechnology and biological control systems.
The truth goes even deeper. As Robert Kennedy Jr. and Sasha Latypova revealed, pharmaceutical companies served merely as window dressing for a Department of Defense operation conducted under Other Transaction Authority, bypassing all regulatory oversight. The Pentagon paid Pfizer and Moderna for their brand names, while military contractors handled the actual production and distribution. This military operation delivered toxic substances to billions of people, while everyone else was debating imaginary proteins.
Women were doubly affected: first as primary victims of direct chemical poisoning, then by the destruction of their reproductive capacity, which impacted future generations. But the mechanism was never exotic genetic technology producing strange proteins. It was straightforward poisoning with lipid nanoparticles—containing polyethylene glycol, literally antifreeze—and dozens of undeclared elements concentrated in the ovaries and reproductive tissues. The spike protein narrative provided a perfect cover, trapping both proponents and opponents in debates about biological impossibilities, while military-grade toxins destroyed female biology on an unprecedented scale.
Part 1: The Biological Impossibility
Stefano Scoglio’s systematic deconstruction of mRNA vaccine mechanisms should have put an end to all debate about spike proteins. With doctorates in both philosophy and microbiology, plus some 20 peer-reviewed publications, Scoglio brought exceptional interdisciplinary expertise to his analysis. His conclusion was unequivocal: the claimed mechanism is biologically impossible.
Living cells pose what researchers themselves acknowledge as a “formidable barrier” to foreign genetic material. Scoglio documented five distinct barriers that prevent the alleged cellular entry and spike protein production. First, extracellular ribonucleases degrade foreign genetic material immediately after injection. These enzymes have evolved specifically to destroy RNA outside cells and protect organisms from genetic invasion. Even with protection from lipid nanoparticles, the vast majority of mRNA would be destroyed within minutes.
Second, even if some of the mRNA were to survive, its uptake by cells faces insurmountable obstacles. Cells don’t simply absorb foreign material; they actively resist it. The few lipid nanoparticles that might approach cells encounter membrane barriers that have evolved over billions of years to block precisely such intruders. Third, any material that did somehow enter the cells would encounter the endosome/lysosome system—the cellular digestive mechanism that destroys foreign matter. Scoglio calculated that even in the impossible scenario where half of the injected mRNA survived the extracellular destruction and half entered the cells, the endosome system would destroy 98% of what entered.
Fourth, the theoretically surviving infinitesimal quantity would face intracellular ribonucleases—another layer of enzymes specifically designed to destroy foreign RNA. Finally, even in the fantasy scenario where mRNA reaches the ribosomes, the complex process of translation requires numerous cofactors and conditions not present for foreign synthetic mRNA.
Scoglio illustrated this with numerical reality: starting with 30 micrograms of injected mRNA, even with impossibly generous assumptions at each barrier, theoretically less than 0.15 micrograms could reach the ribosomes – which would then be immediately destroyed by intracellular defense mechanisms. The biological impossibility is absolute.
The most damning was Pfizer’s own evidence. Their Japanese biodistribution study, required for regulatory approval, tracked where lipid nanoparticles entered the body. The results shattered the entire story: lipid nanoparticles were recovered from organs unchanged. “If they had entered the cells, they would have been metabolized, and you wouldn’t have recovered them the same way you injected them,” Scoglio explained. The nanoparticles never delivered their payload because they never entered the cells.
This explains why, despite the fact that billions of people have supposedly been vaccinated and, in theory, “tons of spike protein” have been produced, no research has isolated spike proteins from vaccinated individuals. Every experiment claiming to study spike proteins uses lab-created “recombinant spike proteins”—synthetic versions that prove nothing about what happens in the human body. Scoglio’s question remains unanswered: if spike proteins are produced in billions of people, why has no one ever isolated them from even a single vaccinated person?
The detection methods themselves reveal the fraud. All “detection” of spike proteins is based on antibody tests, but as recent research has shown, antibodies themselves are theoretical constructs that have never been successfully isolated from human blood. Despite more than a century of research, these Y-shaped proteins, supposedly fighting disease, exist only as computer models and laboratory artifacts created using hybridoma technology. Researchers are using nonexistent entities (antibodies) to prove the existence of other nonexistent entities (spike proteins)—circular reasoning at its deepest level.
The editor of a major neuroscience journal recently announced that he will no longer accept articles based on antibody specificity, because he considers the entire premise scientifically invalid. Yet, the entire edifice of spike protein detection rests on this fraudulent foundation. If the detection method itself is fictitious, how can one have confidence in the claimed findings?
Scoglio saw right through this theatrics: “Anyone talking about spike proteins and embracing the pharmaceutical companies’ narrative just accepts it as a given. But nobody reads the damned scientific literature.” If you actually read the scientific literature, it turns out there’s no advanced genetic technology involved, but biological impossibility. The spike protein story was never science—it was a cover for poisoning.
Part 2: The Real Weapons – What Has Actually Poisoned Women?
If spike proteins were never produced, what caused the documented devastation, particularly in women? The answer lies in the direct chemical toxicity of two sources: the lipid nanoparticles themselves and 55 undeclared elements discovered by spectrometric analysis.
The lipid nanoparticles, even without mRNA payload, are potent toxins. Polyethylene glycol (PEG), their main component, is literally the main ingredient in antifreeze. As Scoglio noted, “How can that be good for you?” These synthetic lipids are “highly anti-inflammatory and highly immunogenic. They cause edema in all the membranes of the body. They cause blood clots.” The toxicity is immediate and direct—no protein production is required.
The Japanese biodistribution study, which demonstrated that no cellular uptake ever occurred, simultaneously revealed where these toxic particles accumulated: the ovaries exhibited the highest concentration of all organs. The lipid nanoparticles concentrated in the female reproductive tissue, not to deliver genetic instructions, but as toxic accumulations of synthetic chemicals. This explains the immediate menstrual irregularities, the bleeding, the reproductive chaos—direct chemical poisoning of the ovarian tissue.
Research in December 2024 revealed an even more sinister component: 55 undeclared chemical elements in all COVID vaccines. Researchers detected all 11 heavy metals, including mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic. They found 12 of the 15 lanthanides, rare earth elements with electromagnetic and luminescent properties. They discovered titanium, aluminum, barium, and dozens of other elements that have no legitimate vaccine function.
The systematic presence of these elements across all manufacturers rules out contamination. This indicates the deliberate addition of materials with documented applications in self-assembly nanotechnology and optogenetic research. When specific heavy metals and lanthanides are combined with surfactants such as polysorbate 80 and polyethylene glycol—both present in the injections—they can spontaneously assemble into complex structures capable of interacting with biological systems.
These elements affect women differently than men for several reasons. Heavy metals accumulate preferentially in tissues with a high fat content—breast tissue, ovaries, and the female brain contain more fat than their male counterparts. Lanthanides interact with calcium channels, which play a crucial role in women’s hormonal cycles. The endocrine-disrupting properties of many detected elements—particularly aluminum and barium—disrupt the delicate hormonal balance necessary for female reproduction.
The concentration patterns speak volumes. Biodistribution studies revealed that ovaries accumulated lipid nanoparticles in concentrations higher than in most other organs. This means that women’s reproductive organs received the highest doses of both PEG-based toxins and the undeclared elements they contain. The ovaries, which housed the eggs for a woman’s entire life, became storage sites for industrial chemicals and heavy metals.
The detected elements align perfectly with emerging biotechnologies for monitoring and control. Lanthanides enable optogenetic applications, which use light to control cellular activity. The specific combination of elements found matches that used in quantum dot technology, which the Gates Foundation commissioned from MIT to track vaccinations. These materials could theoretically form self-assembling structures that respond to electromagnetic signals, although their primary and immediate effect was direct poisoning.
The mechanism doesn’t require any exotic genetic engineering. Direct chemical toxicity explains every observed effect. Heavy metal poisoning causes menstrual irregularities—documented for centuries in industrial exposures. Lanthanides disrupt calcium signaling, which is essential for conception and maintaining pregnancy. Aluminum accumulation causes premature ovarian failure. The combination creates a toxic synergy that is particularly destructive to female biology.
The higher percentage of body fat in women means a higher bioaccumulation of lipophilic toxins. Their more complex hormonal systems create more potential for disruption. Their monthly cycles require a precise chemical balance that can easily be disrupted by foreign elements. The concentration in the ovaries meant a direct attack on the eggs, potentially affecting not only immediate fertility but also the genetic integrity of generations.
This explains why 70% of the side effects occurred in women without any spike protein production. Direct poisoning with gender-specific accumulation patterns explains all the observed effects. The damage to the reproductive system, the menstrual chaos, the collapse of fertility—all the results of concentrated release of toxic chemicals to the female reproductive organs, not of imaginary protein production.
Part 3: The Gender-Related Destruction – Evidence Without Fairy Tales
The documented evidence of gender-related harm from The Pfizer Papers remains valid and devastating, even if we reject the spike protein explanation. The numbers tell a story of targeted biological destruction that doesn’t require a genetic fairy tale to explain its mechanisms.
Women experienced nearly three times as many adverse events as men. The 70% figure applies to every organ system: 94% of dermatological adverse events, 77% of cardiovascular adverse events, and 81% of blood vessel inflammation. The pattern becomes more pronounced during the reproductive years, with teenage girls and women between the ages of 20 and 50 bearing the heaviest burden. After menopause, the gender gap narrows—a pattern consistent with hormonal interactions with toxic chemicals, not protein production.
The havoc wreaked on the reproductive system defies comprehension. Pfizer documented 129,988 adverse events related to menstrual disorders in women through June 2022, with 35,534 reports of excessive bleeding or hemorrhage. Women reported menstrual disorders ranging from complete absence of menstruation to persistent bleeding lasting months. Postmenopausal women suddenly began bleeding again—a medical impossibility except due to a severe chemical imbalance. Teenage girls required transfusions due to bleeding.
These effects perfectly match the known consequences of heavy metal poisoning and hormone disruption. Mercury causes irregular menstruation. Lead accumulates in the bones and is released during pregnancy, poisoning both the mother and the fetus. Aluminum disrupts the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. The cocktail of 55 undeclared elements caused unprecedented chaos in the reproductive system through direct chemical damage.
The pregnancy data point to targeted destruction. Of the 124 vaccinated mothers monitored by Pfizer, 28 fetuses or newborns died – a mortality rate of 23%. This does not require a spike protein; heavy metals cross the placenta, lanthanides disrupt fetal development, and lipid nanoparticles cause direct placental toxicity. The company observed premature rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, and neonatal death – all symptoms consistent with chemical poisoning.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt’s autopsy results, although interpreted through the lens of the spike protein, actually demonstrate direct tissue destruction due to toxic accumulation. The testicular samples, which show a complete absence of spermatozoa, reflect the accumulation of heavy metals in male reproductive tissue. The lymphocytic infiltration in the reproductive organs indicates an immune response to chemical toxins, not protein production. When Burkhardt warned that no woman should plan a child with a vaccinated man, he was documenting chemical sterilization, whether he realized it or not.
The contamination of breast milk provides particularly clear evidence against the spike protein narrative. Four women reported that their milk turned “blue-green”—something never before described in medical literature. This color change indicates chemical contamination, likely from copper compounds or other metallic elements. The 19% of breastfed babies who experienced adverse reactions were not reacting to proteins, but to heavy metals and synthetic chemicals concentrated in the breast milk.
The case of the infant who developed convulsions after breastfeeding, was rushed to the emergency room, and died of multiple organ failure—this was not protein poisoning, but acute chemical toxicity. Heavy metals cause seizures. Lanthanides disrupt neural function. The baby was poisoned by contaminated milk, a tragedy that requires no genetic mechanism to explain.
The timing of the adverse reactions supports direct toxicity over protein production. Most reactions occurred within 48-72 hours after injection, consistent with immediate chemical poisoning and not the theoretical timeframe of cellular protein production. The inflammatory reactions, blood clots, and organ failure—all are consistent with the known toxic effects of the identified elements and lipid nanoparticles.
VAERS data, despite their limitations, reveal patterns consistent with chemical rather than biological damage. The clustering of miscarriages immediately following vaccination campaigns suggests acute toxicity, not gradual protein accumulation. The nearly 5,000 reported miscarriages and stillbirths, adjusted for underreporting, represent 200,000 pregnancy losses in the United States alone—a scale of reproductive destruction that can be achieved by poisoning, not imaginary proteins.
The destruction of male fertility, although affecting fewer individuals, proved equally severe. Complete azoospermia, or the absence of sperm, occurred in several cases. Testicular tissue showed extensive damage with inflammatory infiltration. The prostate gland exhibited similar damage. These patterns are consistent with the accumulation of heavy metals in male reproductive tissue, which is particularly concerning because testicles have minimal protective barriers against chemical toxins.
The age distribution of the damage offers another clue. Women of childbearing age suffered disproportionately more damage, while prepubescent girls and postmenopausal women showed lower rates. This suggests an interaction with reproductive hormones: estrogen enhances the uptake of heavy metals, and progesterone influences their chemical distribution. The complex hormonal environment during the childbearing years created vulnerability to chemical insults.
All the documented harm in The Pfizer Papers can be explained by direct toxicity, without invoking the impossible mechanism of cell penetration and protein production. The gender-related pattern stems from biological differences in fat distribution, hormonal cycles, and the structure of reproductive organs, all of which influence how the body processes and accumulates toxic chemicals. The evidence remains; only the explanation changes.
Part 4: The Military Operation and the Corporate Theater
The true architecture of the vaccination campaign is revealed by the work of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, who exposed the legal framework that permitted mass poisoning under military authority. Their findings, corroborated by Robert Kennedy Jr.’s conversations with Latypova, expose pharmaceutical companies as mere “window dressing” for a Department of Defense operation.
The mechanism was Other Transaction Authority (OTA)—a contracting method originally developed for NASA in the 1960s to quickly acquire materials without regulatory oversight. The Pentagon used OTA to procure injections as “demonstration products” or “prototypes,” not as medical products. This classification placed them completely outside the jurisdiction of the FDA, CDC oversight, and any traditional regulatory framework.
“The Pentagon wouldn’t say, wouldn’t put on the product, that this was a Pentagon-Department of Defense product,” Kennedy explained. “They were essentially paying the pharmaceutical companies for their brand name, so people would think they were getting something from Pfizer Moderna.” The pharmaceutical companies provided the corporate cover, while more than 400 military contractors handled the actual production and distribution.
The contracts, obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests, explicitly state the scope: “large-scale production demonstration.” The documents specifically exclude clinical development and regulatory compliance as “outside the scope.” The Department of Defense ordered prototypes under emergency authorization, not drugs under health regulations. When parents thought they were giving their children a Pfizer vaccine, they injected them with a military-grade prototype.
This structure explains the impossible regulatory violations. Pfizer failed to comply with good manufacturing practices during approval, as military prototypes are not required to meet such regulations. There were no actual clinical trials—the theatrical performances called trials had no legal significance under the OTA. The FDA’s “approval” was theatrical; the agency had no actual authority over military prototypes.
Within this framework, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) became a de facto dictator with exclusive authority to declare products “safe and effective” based on personal conviction, not evidence. First Alex Azar and then Xavier Becerra were able to maintain this declaration despite mounting evidence of harm. There is no mechanism to challenge their decision. As Latypova revealed, “There are no stopping criteria. He never has to reconsider the decision.”
This military structure explains why the spike protein narrative was crucial. A Department of Defense chemical weapons operation would have been met with immediate resistance. But a medical intervention using advanced genetic technology, produced by trusted pharmaceutical companies, could achieve near-universal compliance. The spike protein narrative transformed the military deployment of toxic substances into what appears to be civilian healthcare.
The coordination is reflected in simultaneous global reporting. Every country simultaneously declared it “safe and effective,” used identical arguments about spike proteins, and applied the same censorship to dissenting opinions. This wasn’t a random consensus, but military-grade information operations. The spike protein narrative was deployed as deliberately as the toxic injections themselves.
Those taking vaccines are shockingly ignorant of the criminal fraud behind Big Pharma
The suppression of adverse event data followed military, not medical, protocols. When many deaths occurred, no recalls were issued—unthinkable in pharmaceutical regulations, but common practice when weapons were deployed. The VAERS system was deliberately difficult to use, reports were deleted, and safety signals were ignored. These were not mistakes, but characteristics of a military operation that avoided documenting casualties.
The legal immunity architecture confirms that this is a military operation. The PREP Act, which was invoked for these injections, provides almost complete immunity from “countermeasures” during declared emergencies. Countermeasures are military terminology, not medical. The entire framework—from development to deployment to immunity from prosecution—follows military, not pharmaceutical, patterns.
Pfizer and Moderna executives played their part, but the chain of command ran through the Pentagon and the intelligence community. Operation Warp Speed wasn’t vaccine development, but a military operation with pharmaceutical companies as a cover. The hundreds of billions in government contracts went primarily to defense contractors, not pharmaceutical companies.
This explains why the toxic content was not disclosed. Military operations do not provide ingredient lists to their targets. The 55 unlisted elements are military-grade materials for purposes other than poisoning, namely for potential tracking, monitoring, or control technologies. The presence of elements with optogenetic and electromagnetic properties suggests possibilities consistent with military research into biological monitoring and control systems.
The genius of using pharmaceutical companies as a cover-up cannot be overstated. When injuries occurred, the victims sued Pfizer, not the Pentagon. As the death toll mounted, the outrage focused on corporate greed, not military attacks. The corporations absorbed the public anger, while the real perpetrators remained hidden. Even critics like Wolf, who do provide valuable documentation, focus their criticism on pharmaceutical malfeasance rather than military operations.
The spike protein narrative served multiple purposes in this structure. It provided sufficient scientific complexity to keep the public at bay. It created plausible deniability for military officials—they were simply following “the science.” It allowed for endless debate about biological mechanisms while obscuring the command’s responsibility. Most importantly, it perpetuated the virus narrative, which was essential for invoking emergency powers that made the entire operation possible.
Part 5: The consequences for the population – Large-scale poisoning
Nine months after vaccination campaigns were implemented in developed countries, birth rates plummeted with mathematical precision. The correlation between vaccination rates and the decline in birth rates was so statistically significant—a p-value of 0.00000000000003014—that coincidence is impossible. This demographic catastrophe required no spike proteins, no genetic modification, and no exotic biology—only systematic poisoning of the reproductive system with known fertility-destroying chemicals.
In 19 European countries, births fell by 7%, coinciding with the uptake of the injections. Taiwan experienced a 9.22% decline, resulting in the loss of 12,885 expected babies. Australia’s birth rate plummeted after years of gradual decline. The nine-month delay—the human pregnancy—appeared in every dataset like a fingerprint of reproductive toxicity. Governments responded by ceasing to publish birth data, which in itself was an acknowledgement of the catastrophe.
The mechanism was simple chemical sterilization. Heavy metals destroy fertility through multiple pathways. Lead accumulates in the ovaries and disrupts follicular development. Mercury disrupts hormonal signals essential for conception. Cadmium causes direct damage to eggs and sperm. The cocktail of 55 undeclared elements caused reproductive toxicity greater than that of any single poison.
There is historical precedent for such population reduction through injections. The WHO’s tetanus vaccination program in Kenya included the hormone hCG, which produced antibodies against pregnancy. The 1974 Kissinger Report explicitly linked population control to access to resources and national security. These programs evolved from crude sterilization to sophisticated chemical disruption of reproduction, culminating in the current operation.
The selection of elements reveals a deliberate intent. The specific combination found—all heavy metals, most lanthanides—is consistent with research on fertility reduction conducted by military and intelligence agencies. These were not random contaminants, but carefully selected elements known to accumulate in reproductive tissues and disrupt hormonal function. The presence of elements with no other purpose than to disrupt reproduction cannot be a coincidence.
Women were disproportionately affected by this demographic onslaught. One man can father thousands of children; a woman may give birth to a dozen children in her lifetime. By targeting female reproduction, a maximum effect on the population is achieved. The concentration of toxins in the ovaries—documented in biodistribution studies—represents efficient demographic warfare. Destroying eggs destroys generations; poisoning ovaries prevents population recovery.
The collapse of the birth rate went beyond a simple decline in fertility. Miscarriages skyrocketed. Stillbirths rose. Fetal abnormalities occurred at unprecedented rates. The multigenerational impact extends beyond current fertility and extends to genetic integrity itself. Heavy metals cause chromosomal damage. Lanthanides disrupt DNA repair. The full genetic consequences will only become apparent over generations.
The geographical universality defies conventional explanations other than deliberate deployment. Different population groups, healthcare systems, and baseline health conditions all showed an identical temporal correlation between injection and birth rate collapse. This pattern requires centralized planning and coordinated execution—hallmarks of military operations, not random pharmaceutical side effects.
The economic implications serve the goals of population reduction. Pension systems collapse without young workers. Healthcare systems designed for population pyramids cannot function with inverted demographics. Economic models that require growth face irreversible decline. These consequences were not unforeseen, but intended: population reduction through economic collapse rather than outright annihilation.
The fact that developed countries are being targeted reveals the strategic intent in particular. These populations consume disproportionately more resources—the explicit concern of the Kissinger report. Their level of education allows them to question authority. Their democratic structures can resist authoritarian control. Reducing these populations while preserving others creates demographic shifts that align with documented globalist objectives.
Replacement migration, simultaneously promoted while indigenous populations face a collapse in fertility, is causing a demographic transformation. This is not a conspiracy theory, but documented policy—UN reports on “replacement migration” explicitly discuss the use of immigration to compensate for population decline. The vaccination campaign caused the decline that necessitated replacement, thus achieving demographic goals unattainable through democratic means.
Young women have suffered the most—precisely the demographic group essential for population recovery. Teenage girls with reproductive damage may never become fertile again. Women in their twenties and thirties, of childbearing age, faced immediate infertility or pregnancy loss. The chance of demographic recovery diminishes with each generation damaged.
The impact on men, while numerically smaller, proves to be equally strategic. Complete azoospermia in young men eliminates genetic lines. Testosterone suppression due to heavy metals reduces the urge to procreate. The psychological impact—men knowing they are infertile—disrupts family formation. The combined damage to both men and women has a multiplicative rather than additive demographic effect.
Given the persistent nature of heavy metal accumulation, recovery of the birth rate seems unlikely. These elements remain in the tissue for years or decades. Lanthanides are incorporated into the bone structure and are slowly released over time. The reproductive toxicity persists long after injection, permanently suppressing fertility. The demographic weapon continues to function after deployment.
Part 6: The Perfect Crime Through Perfect Deception
The spike protein story is the most elegant scientific hoax ever devised—a masterpiece of deception that ensnared entire populations in a debate about imaginary proteins, while the real poisoning proceeded unnoticed. Both proponents and opponents accepted the premise and endlessly debated something that never existed, while military-grade toxins destroyed human biology.
Consider the ingenuity of this deception. Vaccine proponents proclaimed that spike proteins created immunity. Vaccine critics warned that spike proteins caused myocarditis, crossed the blood-brain barrier, and persisted indefinitely. Both sides debated the mechanism, duration, and breakdown of proteins that were never produced. The debate itself confirmed the lie: by debating the properties of spike proteins, both sides confirmed their existence.
The story operated through multiple layers of deception. First, it retained sufficient scientific complexity to preclude public understanding. Doctors repeated rote explanations about mRNA translation and felt competent while spreading falsehoods. The public understood just enough—”genetic instructions make proteins”—to feel informed while understanding nothing. Few possessed the expertise to recognize what Scoglio saw: biological impossibility.
Second, it offered a universal explanation for every injury. Blood clots? Spike protein. Myocarditis? Spike protein. Neurological damage? Spike protein crossing the blood-brain barrier. Sudden deaths? Spike protein overwhelming the system. The beauty of it was that blame could be placed on an undetectable culprit. No one could isolate spike proteins from vaccinated people because they didn’t exist, but this lack of evidence became evidence of clearance, not evidence of absence.
Third, fear was used as a weapon against both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The vaccinated worried about persistent spike production and sought “detoxification protocols” for proteins they had never produced. The unvaccinated feared “shedding” by the vaccinated, creating social divisions that hindered unity in the resistance. Everyone remained terrified of invisible proteins, while the real toxins—heavy metals, lanthanides, synthetic lipids—were allowed to do their work unhindered.
Alarming: ‘Unusual increase’ in cases of severe myocarditis affects newborns and babies in the UK
The controlled opposition proved particularly effective. Prominent critics who questioned the safety of vaccines but accepted the production of spike proteins created a perfect limited hangout. They focused their anger on pharmaceutical companies for producing dangerous proteins, rather than on the military command for deploying chemical weapons. They called for better vaccines that produce safer proteins, instead of acknowledging the entire framework as deceptive.
Even The Pfizer Papers , while providing valuable documentation, inadvertently reinforces the deception by accepting spike proteins as the mechanism of damage. This allows defenders to dismiss valid evidence of damage by attacking the imaginary mechanism. “How could spike proteins cause this?” becomes a reason to dismiss real harm from actual toxins.
The virus story and the spike protein story reinforce each other. If viruses have spike proteins used to enter cells, then vaccines that produce spike proteins seem logical. The entire framework—the virus infects via spike, the vaccine protects via spike, damage occurs via spike—creates an internally consistent fiction. If you question one element, the entire structure collapses. Therefore, questioning the existence of the virus or the production of spike leads to extreme censorship.
The story of shedding deserves special attention as a psychological operation. The idea that vaccinated people emit spike proteins and endanger others by their proximity created a perfect divide. Families were divided. Friendships were ended. The vaccinated became bioweapons in the minds of those who refused the injection. This prevented precisely what the operation threatened: a collective recognition of a military attack on the entire population.
Alternative media amplified the deception. Countless articles about spike protein detoxification, spike neutralization supplements, and protocols for preventing the spread of the virus—all reinforced the fundamental lie. The wellness industry sold solutions to imaginary problems, while real poisoning went untreated. People spent fortunes on spike protein remedies, while heavy metals accumulated in their tissues.
Antibody test fraud came full circle. Since antibodies themselves don’t exist as described, using them to detect spike proteins created a perfect, irrefutable narrative. Test shows antibodies? Proof of a spike. No antibodies? Spike already gone. The nonexistent detected the imaginary, creating evidence out of thin air. Scientists published papers on the persistence of spike proteins using detection methods that detect nothing.
Fact-checkers played a crucial role in perpetuating the narrative. They didn’t defend the truth, but rather protected the spike protein story from scrutiny. When researchers questioned its biological plausibility, fact-checkers declared it “misinformation.” When doctors noted the absence of isolated spike proteins, fact-checkers cited studies using recombinant proteins. The guardians of the truth guarded lies.
This deception allowed for unacknowledged mass poisoning. While heated debates raged over mRNA stability, injection temperature, and protein folding, the actual use of 55 undeclared elements continued unhindered. While scientists debated the glycosylation patterns of spike proteins, military contractors spread heavy metals and lanthanides. The debate itself served as a cover for the crime.
Conclusion: looking through the theater
The evidence is mounting with devastating clarity. Stefano Scoglio proved the biological impossibility of the claimed mechanism. The Japanese biodistribution study confirmed that lipid nanoparticles never entered cells. No spike protein has ever been isolated from a vaccinated person, despite billions allegedly producing them. Meanwhile, spectrometric analysis revealed 55 undeclared elements used in surveillance and control technology. The fragments paint a picture of military-grade poisoning disguised as a medical intervention.
Women were the hardest hit: 70% of the adverse events, 129,988 cases of menstrual disorders, and a 23% mortality rate among fetuses and newborns of injected mothers. These figures apply regardless of the mechanism, but the real cause was not exotic genetic engineering that produced foreign proteins. It was systematic poisoning with lipid nanoparticles that concentrated in the ovaries, heavy metals that destroyed fertility, and lanthanides that disrupted reproduction. The gender-specific impact reflected biological differences in how female bodies process and accumulate toxins, not differential protein production.
The Pfizer Papers deserve credit for documenting this catastrophe, but accepting the spike protein narrative ultimately limits its impact. By accepting the impossible mechanism, it inadvertently provides cover for the actual crime. The book throws Pfizer under the bus, while the responsible military command structure remains hidden. The authors pursue shadows, while the real criminals escape responsibility.
The revelation that pharmaceutical companies served as “window dressing” for a US Department of Defense operation shifts the understanding of responsibility. While Pfizer and Moderna executives were complicit, they played a role in the military theater. The real perpetrators wear uniforms, not lab coats. The chain of command runs through the Pentagon, not through the boardrooms of pharmaceutical companies. The crimes are military attacks, not corporate fraud.
The demographic impact—birth rates plummeted on all continents exactly nine months after the injection—reveals that population reduction was the goal, not a side effect. The specific targeting of women of childbearing age, the concentration of toxins in reproductive organs, the selection of fertility-destroying elements—none of this was accidental. This was chemical warfare against human reproduction, disguised as public health.
The perfect crime required a perfect distraction. The spike protein story succeeded brilliantly, capturing everyone’s attention while the actual poisoning was taking place. Even as evidence of the fraud comes to light, most people remain trapped in the story, debating the properties of proteins that never existed, fearing the spread of something that never happened, and seeking detoxification from imaginary toxins while the real ones accumulate.
To break free, you must leave behind comforting lies. There was no virus. There were no spike proteins. There was no pandemic, except one created by propaganda. There was the military deployment of toxic substances under the guise of a public health emergency, with pharmaceutical companies acting as a cover while the media maintained control of the narrative. Recognizing this truth is a prerequisite for accountability.
The implications extend beyond direct harm and touch on fundamental questions about institutional trust and human autonomy. If military forces can poison populations while perpetuating a theatrical narrative of protection, what security remains for human freedom? If regulatory agencies function as propaganda organs for military operations, what protection remains against state violence? If the entire medical profession can be deployed to poison patients, what happens to the concept of medical ethics?
Women deserve specific recognition, not only as disproportionately large victims, but also as targets of demographic warfare. The attack on women’s reproductive capacity is an attack on the future of humanity itself. Poisoning mothers, contaminating breast milk, destroying fertility—these crimes against women are crimes against the very existence of humanity.
The way forward requires more than research or reforms—it requires the recognition that the entire framework was a military attack disguised as medicine. No regulatory adjustment can address the systematic poisoning by military troops. No vaccine safety monitoring can prevent the use of chemical weapons under the guise of prophylaxis. The solution isn’t better vaccines, but the realization that the entire program was warfare.
As long as the deception surrounding spike proteins remains, true accountability remains impossible. Every moment spent debating imaginary proteins is a moment not spent prosecuting actual poisoning. Every article about spike protein detoxification is an article not written about heavy metal chelation. Every study on antibodies that don’t exist is a study not conducted on actual toxins that destroy the human body.
The evidence demands action. The biological impossibility has been proven. The toxic elements have been documented. The military structure has been exposed. The demographic destruction has been measured. What remains is a choice: continue to participate in the theater of proteins that don’t exist, or face the reality of the military poisoning of billions of people. The women who bear the brunt of the attack, the children who were never conceived, the generations who were poisoned—they all deserve better than endless discussions of scientific fiction while scientific facts destroy human biology.
The theater only continues as long as the audience comes to see it. The spike protein show only continues as long as people are watching. The moment enough people recognize the deception—that they’ve been poisoned by military troops with industrial chemicals and heavy metals while arguing about imaginary proteins—the whole structure collapses. That moment approaches, accelerated by every revelation, every impossible contradiction, every documented lie. The truth, once seen, cannot be unseen.