The Last Three Months of Candace Owens’ Methodology
Dear freedom fighter, trying to make sense of the world, and to beat back evil,
I do not just want you to watch more Candace Owens, but I want you to go back to September 10, 2025, and to watch all of her broadcasts from that point forward.
Candace Owens is not a saint who should be imitated in every thought. That is not why I recommend watching her. I want you to watch her because of her thought process and her methodology.
We Live In A Post-Newsroom Era
We live in a post-newsroom era. That is a blessing, because the newsrooms of the past several decades were easily controlled places that truth seldom escaped from.
Americans are left with unmet needs that newsrooms once filled: including watchdog, whistle-blower, check on corruption, and bulwark against tyranny.
There is presently no space in society carved out for those roles. Americans are attempting to carve space for that through trial and error.
That has come with much challenge.
Alex Jones
Journalist, commentator, and media entrepreneur Alex Jones was struck a significant blow with the intentionally debilitating Sandy Hook lawfare intended to make him permanently inaccessible to his audience — an audience that has for decades been one of the biggest audiences in media.
Alex Jones, got many things right, and he got them right long before many others. He was not afraid to make a mistake as he drew conclusions. He was not afraid to state conclusions that he could see, even when they did not come with the weight of peer-reviewed rigor or the thoroughness expected of some academic journals.
Jones was a poet stepping out into the wilderness, bringing information from the most powerful fringes of society to a more mainstream audience.
Tucker Carlson
This Alex Jones approach is a model, to a degree, being followed by Tucker Carlson. Carlson, is not as edgy in his investigation or presentation, but, similar to Jones, he is a voice that helps to bring important ideas into a more mainstream place.
The role of an Alex Jones is vital in this new media environment: people willing to speak about trends, tendencies, and likely outcomes years before they occur.
As Carlson pointed out in an autumn 2025 interview, anonymous Twitter accounts are the philosophers of our day, delivering shocking clarity and truth — a testament to how badly diversity quotas have failed the American public by elevating superficiality over talent.
This, points to an important decentralized role that is being played, in which people, silenced by the risk of social, economic, and legal repercussions, present ideas and think aloud in pseudonymity.
Anonymity And Free Thought
The ability to be pseudonymous as a researcher on the internet is valuable. The ability to be discerning is also valuable. Accordingly, any effort to either 1. de-anonymize internet activity or to 2. curate internet activity is harmful for this process.
A functioning free society cannot exist without the ability for people to publicly think through ideas together without repercussion for being wrong.
This is so vital to a free society, that one should not take seriously any person who challenges that idea. For one to not realize the centrality of that idea makes him 1. not clever enough to have his opinion considered valid or 2. too sinister to have his opinion considered valid.
Europeans, Jews, and Muslims
That Europe is full of governments that censor free speech is understandable. They have never broken from tradition well-enough to attempt freedom, rather they have largely larped at freedom.
While some European countries are better than others, Europe generally finds itself anti-freedom in several important areas: 1. the inalienable human right to free speech, 2. the inalienable human right to bear arms, and 3. the inalienable human right to not have to pay for another person’s medical treatment. It is common to find Europeans attacking those who understand freedom as inclusive of the above three as “barbaric.”
It is also worth noting that Judaism, well past the Enlightenment, existed under near-total clerical control, putting drastic limits on free speech. Beyond mere parochial ethnic interests, the roots of petit-fascists such as the Leo Frank Defense League (the ADL) are established in rabbinic tyranny. Somehow this is allowed to continue to drag the disadvantages of the medieval shtetl into the heart of contemporary politics in the freest country on the planet.
Those roots need to be both noticed and opposed.
It can hardly be a surprise that both Europeans and Jews clinging to those cultural tendencies drive censorship in America. While Islamic censorship, with tendencies to similarly be ruled by heavy-handed clerics unappreciative of the value of free speech, has played striking roles in Europe, that role has not appeared on the national stage in America in the same way, though it has potential to.
These cultural tendencies should not be surprising, but should be acknowledged and openly stopped.
John Kass
The best journalist of the late newsroom era, was John Kass of the Chicago Tribune. I have a long list of writers across the globe I like who cover local matters, and John Kass for some twenty-five years wrote the very best hard-hitting local opinion piece of all.
“Ruthless” best describes his writing.
In the fallout of 2020, Kass wrote an uncommonly gentle column in which he criticized George Soros for helping to install a pro-crime State’s Attorney over Chicago. This was preposterously deemed an anti-semitic slur. In those perplexing, blurry post-2020 days that we all lived through, daily it seemed that anything was possible, for not many people were paying attention and there were so many outrages to decency taking place. In the midst of that, Kass was moved from his page 2 location at the Chicago Tribune to the section where the undistinguished scrub columnists wrote. They had finally gotten Kass. He would not last much longer at the paper.
There was hardly a mafia bagman, a political bagman, a mafia boss, or a political boss that the risk-taking Kass did not anger in his twenty-five years writing that column, but this pedestrian nonsense was the thing that took down Kass.
While Eric Zorn (one of the Chicago Tribune scrub columnists) says this was unrelated to the Soros article Kass wrote, Zorn also acknowledges that Kass could have done himself a lot of good if he would have just apologized for accidentally stumbling upon the anti-semitic trope. Yes, why didn’t Kass just apologize after doing nothing wrong, except tell the truth. Zorn offers, as an example, the time that Zorn accidentally used the word hurtful word “transgendered” instead of “transgender” in a column, and responsibly apologized for it. While I knew Zorn was a scrub, I did not realize he was also a cuck, until I sat down to research this piece of writing.
The writer who is afraid to offend and eager to apologize is a pathetic writer. Sure, he might be a nice guy to have as a pedicurist, but he isn’t the impactful thinker who will say (or write) the things that need saying and that no one else dare write.
And that brings me to Candace Owens.
How I would love to dislike Owens.
But I would dismiss her at my own peril.
Candace Owens
As America comes to terms with what it means to get beyond the newsroom, and how to continue the important role of the Fourth Estate in American society, Candace Owens in the autumn of 2025 has played arguably the most important role of any journalist in this period by demonstrating an example of what that role of Fourth Estate could look like for an American journalist running a small media operation.
Who killed JFK?
Who killed RFK?
Who killed MLK?
Who killed Malcolm X?
Who did 9/11?
I don’t know any of these and neither do you, but I have my suspicions. Reality has been shaped by the time that has elapsed since these crimes without clear answers. And now I will ask a very different question: Who killed Charlie Kirk?
This question is different because time is not elapsing before effective non-governmental investigation.
The Fourth Estate has jumped into action to answer this question in a way that makes the event so much more positively consequential for the future of America than any of the other insufficiently solved crimes. It hasn’t jumped into action in the form of a newsroom. The newsroom is dead. CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, CNN, AP, are irrelevant and growing more irrelevant by the day. A stay-at-home mom named Candace Owens and her largely pseudonymous internet friends are instead solving this crime.
And the methodology is worth noticing.
The Owens Methodology For Fourth Estate Renewal
- Do not care what anyone thinks.
Do not be beholden to anyone.
- Do not stop in pursuing the truth.
There is one goal: authenticity.
- Treat all friends like suspects.
The most ugly thing that I have watched Candace Owens do was to coldly turn the spotlight on someone who approached her with an offer to help.
- Let no allies publicly sway you.
- Go for the jugular in everything you say.
No one is promised tomorrow, yet so many people are saving their gunpowder for another day as if they were promised tomorrow. If Candace Owens died this very moment, I am convinced that she would die having said everything that she needed to say.
- Have simple goals, staying true to core values.
Candace Owens is not doing rocket science. On a shoestring budget, with the will do her work, she is putting to shame much larger old media and new media entities. She is applying intuition, digging deeper around liars, openly sharing spotted lies, and inviting people to dig deeper as well. This is her main strategy that she is using to suss out the murderer of Charlie Kirk.
- Openly make mistakes.
- Keep prayerful.
- Keep reading.
- Keep curious.
- Never think you have all the answers.
- Be ready to be swayed by better reason and better research.
- Marshall the resources of those around you.
The most dangerous aspect of Owens is what she calls the “CIA,” her “Candace Intelligence Agency,” a decentralized and amorphous group that are ready to go out and research simply because she is authentic about her pursuit of the truth.
- Be transparent, show research, openly share the weakness in your research
- Be a voice of truth that others can rally around
- Use your platform for good as much as possible
Everyone has a platform of people who listen to them, whether that be 3 people in size, or 3 million people. Owens could sit around complaining, “Why don’t I have a bigger platform?” and waiting until she does, or she could be working with what she has. We are each called to do that. The best way to grow our influence among the right people is to do the most authentic work possible and to share it as authentically as possible.
The Greatest Heroes Have Not Yet Existed
The greatest heroes of this era have not yet existed. This post-newsroom era has not yet seen the most dramatic possibilities of how the Fourth Estate can be used to advance human freedom and to advance American ideals. Candace Owens is a powerful daily demonstration of what could be possible. I recommend that each one of her broadcasts be watched from September 10 forward, and one of the most important reasons for doing that is to observe her methodology and to grow yourself from that exposure to it.
She is more innovative than most and even on a small budget and with a small team she is more effective than many, incorporating so many varying techniques that are making her effective and hard to stop.
Please dear reader, do not miss that chance to witness this relevant, free, methodology training that Owens is unintentionally giving. I am certain the global media landscape will be powerfully changed for the better, the more this methodology is observed by those hungry to identify and share truth in the world around them.