Where are the Covid Prosecutions?
For a year and a half into the so-called Gilded Age—despite a deep, and thus far insatiable, hunger for justice among much of the MAGA base—the administration has prosecuted precisely zero Covid criminals.
Moreover, when Pam Bondi isn’t promising to prosecute Americans for “hate speech” or rolling out new plans to cover up the Epstein case, the Justice Department hasn’t found the time or energy to even investigate, writes Benjamin Bartee .
No prosecution, no investigation, no press releases.
Nothing but radio silence.
The man who heads HHS, RFK Jr., wrote a great, beautiful book detailing in detail the rampant criminality of Fauci and many, many of his co-conspirators.
And yet nothing happens.
AG Pam Bondi seems much more interested in prosecuting phantom crimes like “hate speech” and covering up the Epstein class.
However, if she were inclined to do the work expected of her by the constituency that put her in office, she would have an abundance of legal resources at her disposal.
It is true that for some of the federal crimes these people likely committed—and we are talking only about federal crimes, not including any state laws under which these people could be prosecuted—the statute of limitations has expired and the time for prosecution has expired, since it has been more than six years since the start of the pandemic and even longer since the preparations ( the tabletop exercise Event 201, which happened to take place in October 2019, just months before the lockdowns began , the illegal gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in offshore laboratories, etc.).
Criminal conspiracy – in which these people were demonstrably involved – typically has a five-year statute of limitations.
The most important provision, however, is that the five-year term for criminal conspiracy does not begin to run until the conspiracy ends .
Given that the conspiracy—the vaccination mandates, forced mask-wearing, business closures, etc.—demonstrably continued well into 2023 and possibly beyond, we would still be well within the five-year window for prosecution.
Via Department of Justice (emphasis added):
Conspiracy is a continuing offense . For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act . See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes that do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the statute of limitations . The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiracy agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose is accomplished or abandoned . See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).
When a person withdraws from a conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run for that person. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy, in this context, means that the conspirator must take active steps by confessing to authorities or disclosing his or her withdrawal to the other conspirators . See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).”
Who then should the Justice Department investigate, assuming it is serious about pursuing justice?
A short but very incomplete list to start with:
Anthony Fauci. The head of the snake. See: Please help get this simple Fauci prosecution playbook to Trump.
Peter Daszak, former EcoHealth Alliance member who served as the intermediary through which Fauci channeled NIAID funding to the Wuhan lab (after the Obama administration banned gain-of-function on U.S. soil).
Deborah Birx. The so-called “Scarf Lady” who led the White House’s response under Trump (and failed miserably).
Peter Morens, Fauci’s capo at the NIAID, whom he used as an intermediary to illegally circumvent FOIA record-keeping requirements. ( Morens admitted this in Congressional testimony, under oath .)
Francis Collins, Head of the NIH during and before COVID
Rochelle Walensky, Head of the CDC during COVID
Mandy Cohen, Walensky’s replacement, who cheerfully explained on camera how she arbitrarily imposed COVID lockdowns on the public without scientific basis. See: Biden’s pick for new CDC director laughs at arbitrary imposition of COVID lockdowns
Entire books could be written, and in some cases have been written, about each of these shady characters, whose depravity goes back far further than COVID; their lack of morality or decency was the very thing that catapulted them to the top of the Public Health™ apparatus in the first place.
None of these people, for the record, benefited from the wave of pardons issued by the person operating Biden’s autopen as he was about to leave, with the exception of Anthony Fauci. And even Fauci’s pardon, if indeed signed by autopen, as it appears, is highly suspect.
All this to say: There is no excuse for the complete lack of effort to punish these demons who perpetrated the greatest fraud in world history, killing untold millions of people, and perhaps billions in total.